Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 567 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Categorydown OS ELOG Version Subject Text Attachments
  69800   Fri Jul 12 17:39:53 2024 Reply David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukInfoLinux3.1.4Re: Extendable list of numeric itemsJust to add some points for others who may
find this of use in future.
  
  69809   Wed Jul 24 17:21:45 2024 Reply Aled Isaacc.a.isaac@swnsea.ac.ukInfoWindowsELOG V3.1.4-a04Re: Elog/ImageMagick under windows 11I've managed to get it working and
the problem wasn't what I thought it
was.  It turns out that ImageMagick
  
  49   Thu Jul 4 09:23:50 2002 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chComment  Re: possible to modify link in email notificationHaving the URL link to a different logbook
is right now not possible. But 
what about setting up a single logbook with
  
  63   Tue Jul 9 10:58:18 2002 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chComment  Re: elog submit without user and password> With elog it is possible to submit messages
to a password protected
> logbook without specifying the -u option.
  
  64   Tue Jul 9 15:28:33 2002 Reply H. Scheith.scheit@mpi-hd.mpg.deComment  Re: elog submit without user and password> > With elog it is possible to submit messages
to a password protected
> > logbook without specifying the -u option.
  
  65   Wed Jul 10 08:53:21 2002 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chComment  Re: elog submit without user and password> I guess it cannot and doesn't have to be
100% save.  Maybe if the web
> interface is used for a new message a long
  
  74   Mon Jul 15 15:05:22 2002 Idea Joeri Mastopjoeri.mastop@knmi.nlComment  Re: Port specification with -p fails (SOLVED, more or less)> Anyone seen similar problems? 
Probably not if you read the config file,
'cause I didn't. Shame on me...
  
  78   Tue Jul 23 09:12:14 2002 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chComment  Re: Port specification with -p fails (SOLVED, more or less)> > Anyone seen similar problems? 
> Probably not if you read the config file,
'cause I didn't. Shame on me...
  
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6