Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 567 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
 Find |  Login |  Help 
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
 Full | Summary | Threaded  Show all entries    6460 Entries 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 566, 567, 568 ... 806, 807, 808   Next  
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Categorydown OS ELOG Version Subject Text Attachments
  69800   Fri Jul 12 17:39:53 2024 Reply David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukInfoLinux3.1.4Re: Extendable list of numeric itemsJust to add some points for others who may
find this of use in future.
  
  69809   Wed Jul 24 17:21:45 2024 Reply Aled Isaacc.a.isaac@swnsea.ac.ukInfoWindowsELOG V3.1.4-a04Re: Elog/ImageMagick under windows 11I've managed to get it working and
the problem wasn't what I thought it
was.  It turns out that ImageMagick		   
  49   Thu Jul 4 09:23:50 2002 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chComment  Re: possible to modify link in email notificationHaving the URL link to a different logbook
is right now not possible. But 
what about setting up a single logbook with		   
  63   Tue Jul 9 10:58:18 2002 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chComment  Re: elog submit without user and password> With elog it is possible to submit messages
to a password protected
> logbook without specifying the -u option.		   
  64   Tue Jul 9 15:28:33 2002 Reply H. Scheith.scheit@mpi-hd.mpg.deComment  Re: elog submit without user and password> > With elog it is possible to submit messages
to a password protected
> > logbook without specifying the -u option.		   
  65   Wed Jul 10 08:53:21 2002 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chComment  Re: elog submit without user and password> I guess it cannot and doesn't have to be
100% save.  Maybe if the web
> interface is used for a new message a long		   
  74   Mon Jul 15 15:05:22 2002 Idea Joeri Mastopjoeri.mastop@knmi.nlComment  Re: Port specification with -p fails (SOLVED, more or less)> Anyone seen similar problems? 
Probably not if you read the config file,
'cause I didn't. Shame on me... 		  
  78   Tue Jul 23 09:12:14 2002 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chComment  Re: Port specification with -p fails (SOLVED, more or less)> > Anyone seen similar problems? 
> Probably not if you read the config file,
'cause I didn't. Shame on me... 		  
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 566, 567, 568 ... 806, 807, 808   Next  
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6