Re: Disable Preview button, posted by UlfO on Thu Sep 27 11:22:36 2012
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| UlfO wrote: |
|
Hi,
Is it possible to disable the Previewbutton?
Regards
Ulf Olsson
|
Nope.
|
Is it possible for you to implement this function in a future version of ELOG? |
|
Re: Disable Preview button, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Sep 27 11:26:36 2012
|
| UlfO wrote: |
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| UlfO wrote: |
|
Hi,
Is it possible to disable the Previewbutton?
Regards
Ulf Olsson
|
Nope.
|
Is it possible for you to implement this function in a future version of ELOG?
|
If there is a good reason for that ... |
|
Re: Disable Preview button, posted by UlfO on Thu Sep 27 12:26:09 2012
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| UlfO wrote: |
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| UlfO wrote: |
|
Hi,
Is it possible to disable the Previewbutton?
Regards
Ulf Olsson
|
Nope.
|
Is it possible for you to implement this function in a future version of ELOG?
|
If there is a good reason for that ...
|
The reason for doing this is that the GUI will be cleaner and easier for the users to understand.
If it´s possible to disable functions that you don´t need in a customized ELOG it would be easier to explain how to work with it.
|
|
Re: Disable Delete option when user has the capability to Edit an entry, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Nov 30 19:01:03 2016
|
Save drafts = 0
| John Becker wrote: |
|
Hi, I have a logbook where users can add entries and edit entries.
The delete option has been removed from the menu, but when they edit an entry they are able to delete the entry.
Is there a way to remove the Delete option from the menu that appears when Editing an entry?
Please advise,
Thanks,
John
|
|
Re: Disable Delete option when user has the capability to Edit an entry, posted by John Becker on Thu Dec 1 13:36:16 2016 
|
Hi Stefan,
Thanks for your reply, I did as suggested but the button "Delete" still appears when the edit entry is selected.
Am I overlooking something?
Regards,
John
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
Save drafts = 0
| John Becker wrote: |
|
Hi, I have a logbook where users can add entries and edit entries.
The delete option has been removed from the menu, but when they edit an entry they are able to delete the entry.
Is there a way to remove the Delete option from the menu that appears when Editing an entry?
Please advise,
Thanks,
John
|
|
|
|
Re: Disable Delete option when user has the capability to Edit an entry, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Dec 2 13:50:11 2016
|
No, I get a different result. If I put "Save drafts = 0" in the config example coming with the distribution, I get the following:
sot he "Delete" button is replaced by a "Back" button.
Probably you have an old version of elog, hava a typo on your config, or something like that.
Stefan |
|
Re: Disable Delete option when user has the capability to Edit an entry, posted by John Becker on Fri Dec 2 16:28:17 2016
|
Hi Stefan,
Found it, it was a typo.
Thanks for your patience and support.
Regards,
John
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
No, I get a different result. If I put "Save drafts = 0" in the config example coming with the distribution, I get the following:
sot he "Delete" button is replaced by a "Back" button.
Probably you have an old version of elog, hava a typo on your config, or something like that.
Stefan
|
|
|
Re: Directories in top groups, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Apr 18 21:57:19 2005
|
> I am trying to unify several existing logbook collections that run on
> seperate servers under a single server using groups. For a top group, under
> "[global topgroupname]", I would like to redefine the resource directory or
> the logbook directory so that everything except for the .cfg is at it
> original location. However, it seems like "Resource dir" and "Logbook dir"
> can not be redefined in the global section for specific groups. Is it
> possible to redefine these directories for each top group, or is it feature
> that could be added?
Not easily. There is only a single logbook and resource directory inside elogd.
The reason is that these are constants which can be fixed during compile time.
The Debian package uses this extensively. So having multiple directories would
break that scheme.
> I could probably do what I want with soft-links, but redefining the resource
> dir just seems to be right way to do this. (For one thing, I would like
> different favicons for each group.)
I'm afraid you have to use soft links. The favicons you can define however via
the theme, which is a per-logbook option, so it would work in the [global
topgroupname] section as well. |