ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
66866
|
Wed Jul 28 17:15:33 2010 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | All | 2.7.7 | Re: alphabetize Quick Filter items? |
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
|
Ok, I implemented
Sort attribute options = 1
in the current SVN revision.
|
I've tried adding this statement to my cfg file but the attributes are still unsorted in the QuickFilter menus. Was this implemented in 2.7.7?
Shouldn't an existing configuration file entry like
Options Type = C, D, A, B
be sorted in the QuickFilter menu as A B C D?
|
You need revision 2252 or later. So you have to upgrade to 2.7.8.
|
We have upgraded to 2.7.8 but this still doesn't seem to work. The quick menus are still unsorted. Does it work for you?
|
Sorry, there was a typo, you need
Sort attribute options <attribute> = 1
where <attribute> is the name of the attribute to be sorted (in case you want some attributes sorted, but not all). |
66870
|
Wed Jul 28 22:03:26 2010 |
| Dennis Seitz | dseitz@berkeley.edu | Request | All | 2.7.7 | Re: alphabetize Quick Filter items? |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
|
Ok, I implemented
Sort attribute options = 1
in the current SVN revision.
|
I've tried adding this statement to my cfg file but the attributes are still unsorted in the QuickFilter menus. Was this implemented in 2.7.7?
Shouldn't an existing configuration file entry like
Options Type = C, D, A, B
be sorted in the QuickFilter menu as A B C D?
|
You need revision 2252 or later. So you have to upgrade to 2.7.8.
|
We have upgraded to 2.7.8 but this still doesn't seem to work. The quick menus are still unsorted. Does it work for you?
|
Sorry, there was a typo, you need
Sort attribute options <attribute> = 1
where <attribute> is the name of the attribute to be sorted (in case you want some attributes sorted, but not all).
|
That did the trick. That was a good idea, to give us the option of which attributes to sort, too. Thanks again for adding this feature! |
66895
|
Wed Sep 8 15:31:33 2010 |
| Devin Bougie | dab66@cornell.edu | Request | Linux | 2.7.5 | difficulty with slow connections (was Re: frequent crashes on SL4) | Hi Stefan,
> There was a timeout of 1 sec. in the elogd daemon, which probably is too short for a satellite connection. Unfortunately I have no satellite here
> around to test it, so I "blindly" increased it to 6 seconds in the current SVN version. Please give it a try.
The latest release (2.8.0-2313) does fix this problem. Our user is now able to modify entries and upload attachments using their satellite connection.
Thank you very much for your time and help. I am sorry I didn't receive this in time to help test the old SVN version.
Sincerely,
Devin |
66998
|
Thu Jan 20 18:51:53 2011 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Request | Linux | 2.8.1-2353 | Wishlist: Roption | Hi Stefan,
Roptions, or Radio Buttons. Do you recall that on old
radios, if you gently pressed a button you could release whichever
button was already in, without selecting the new button; in other
words no selection made.
I'd like this same facility with elog. Now I know that it can be
done by (for example) in the config file preselecting one of the
selections on reply- or indeed one that does not exist to "clear" it,
but in this case that is not the route I'd want to take every time.
What I'd like is a (optional) button along with all the others, which
if you click on it, it will clear any selection for that particular Roption.
At present, once an Roption has been selected, it will persist in all
replies unless or until an alternative choice is made. Alternatively, if
no selection has been made, then there is no selection on the reply, either.
[Unless something in the elog.cfg file].
Regards,
David.
|
66999
|
Fri Jan 21 08:49:31 2011 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | Linux | 2.8.1-2353 | Re: Wishlist: Roption | > I'd like this same facility with elog. Now I know that it can be
> done by (for example) in the config file preselecting one of the
> selections on reply- or indeed one that does not exist to "clear" it,
> but in this case that is not the route I'd want to take every time.
What about defining an additional option "unspecified". So you have
Roptions attr = option1, option2, option3, none
Whenever you click on "none", the selection is removed from the other options. The HTML standard unfortunately does
not foresee radio buttons not being selected, so I would have to tweak it somehow to get exactly what you want. |
67000
|
Fri Jan 21 11:28:02 2011 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Request | Linux | 2.8.1-2353 | Re: Wishlist: Roption | > > I'd like this same facility with elog. Now I know that it can be
> > done by (for example) in the config file preselecting one of the
> > selections on reply- or indeed one that does not exist to "clear" it,
> > but in this case that is not the route I'd want to take every time.
>
> What about defining an additional option "unspecified". So you have
>
> Roptions attr = option1, option2, option3, none
>
> Whenever you click on "none", the selection is removed from the other options. The HTML standard unfortunately does
> not foresee radio buttons not being selected, so I would have to tweak it somehow to get exactly what you want.
Hadn't realised the standard was written that way.
What you propose seems fine to me.
David. |
67002
|
Wed Jan 26 19:35:48 2011 |
| Louis de Leseleuc | louis.deleseleuc@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca | Request | Linux | 2.8.1 | Working Ubuntu 10.10 ELOG binaries | Hello,
Can anyone please send me, or publicly provide, working Ubuntu 10.10 binaries (64-bit) for ELOG?
I have compiled and installed the program. While the core functionalities are OK, I have run into irritating bugs in filtering and config editing that are not present in the online demo (but are in my local demo and logbook).
Hence I suspect compilation to be the cause.
For the curious:
- Saving the config within ELOG scrambles the elog.conf file
Theme = default
Comment = Louis's Lab Book
Attributes = Project, Type, Category, Subject
after saving becomes
Them = defaultt
Commnt = Louiss's Lab Book
Attribute = Prroject, Type, Category, Subject
- In the Find page, drop-down filters for attributes are ignored, but text is searched
- In the threaded view, Quick filters "dissociate" posts and replies, so that all rows are now in reverse chronological order
Cheers!
Louis
|
67003
|
Wed Jan 26 19:38:58 2011 |
| Louis de Leseleuc | louis.deleseleuc@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca | Request | Linux | 2.8.1 | Re: Working Ubuntu 10.10 ELOG binaries |
Louis de Leseleuc wrote: |
Hello,
Can anyone please send me, or publicly provide, working Ubuntu 10.10 binaries (64-bit) for ELOG?
I have compiled and installed the program. While the core functionalities are OK, I have run into irritating bugs in filtering and config editing that are not present in the online demo (but are in my local demo and logbook).
Hence I suspect compilation to be the cause.
For the curious:
- Saving the config within ELOG scrambles the elog.conf file
Theme = default
Comment = Louis's Lab Book
Attributes = Project, Type, Category, Subject
after saving becomes
Them = defaultt
Commnt = Louiss's Lab Book
Attribute = Prroject, Type, Category, Subject
- In the Find page, drop-down filters for attributes are ignored, but text is searched
- In the threaded view, Quick filters "dissociate" posts and replies, so that all rows are now in reverse chronological order
Cheers!
Louis
|
Hmm actually that last bug is also present in the demo. Any hope of fixing that?
True, some posts may not match the filters, leaving replies "orphan". I suggest that any orphan reply be either attached to the nearest upper level, or if not possible, be styled as a post instead of a reply (no arrow or indent) so as not to mistake it for a reply to the message above.
The benefit would be to be able to follow threads matching certain categories. |
|