Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 57 of 806  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icondown Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  193   Sat Jan 11 18:09:04 2003 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestion  Re: logbook db size causing very slow response
> Was wondering if there were any tweaks/suggestions for improving the 
> logbooks responsiviness.  Our logbook was started 31 July 01.  Since that 
> time we have went from 1 logbook to 4 logbooks.  Logbook 1 having 2651 
> entries, logbook 2 having 300 entries, and the last 2 are new logbooks, so 
> only a few entries.

Another trick for large logbooks is to divide them into a logbook with 
recent entries and one with old entries (archive), like I did now in this 
forum. One can enable the "copy to" command for the administrator, who then 
can copy regularly old entries to the archive, keeping the recent logkook 
reasonable small with a good responsiviness. If one wants to search then the 
old messages, one can still go to the archive, but then the search command 
takes longer.
  196   Mon Jan 13 11:43:37 2003 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug report  Re: 'group' option in conflict with 'guest logic' and 'LogBook Tabs' option
> small problem : 
> ****************
> Logbook Tabs = 0  in the guest logbook will close the group header
> may be create a parameter to solve ?
> GroupGuest Extranet = ....

What I would recommend in that case is to run two copies of elogd in 
parallel, one for the public and one for the private section. They can even 
run on differnt ports so the firewall can block the private section. If the 
private logbooks are not defined in the public elogd, they don't show up in 
the logbook tabs, so only the publick logbook tabs are seen. Please note 
that two elogd daemons should not have concurrent write access to the same 
logbook, since there is not locking and the logbook could get messed up that 
way. So only one elogd should have write access to any logbook.

- Stefan
  197   Mon Jan 13 11:45:18 2003 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chRequest  Re: call a shell from ELOG / new button [Submit & Notify]
I put this on the wish list.

- Stefan
  199   Fri Jan 24 12:24:18 2003 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug report  Re: confused name in the attributes section
> do not use confused name in attributes
> **************************************
> like
> Attributes Type, Type2
> the info on Type2 will be placed in the Type also
> see attachment 1
> 
> Never use confused name like '
> Attributes PC_Memory, Memory

I acknowledge the problem. It had to do with the fact that for checkbox 
options, the first checkbox is submitted in the above case as "Type0", the 
second as "Type1", and the third as "Type2" which conficts with the other 
attribute. I fixed that and use now "Type#0" and so on which should be fine.

The fix will be included in V2.2.6.

Stefan
  201   Fri Jan 31 09:49:43 2003 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chInfo  Re: Write only
> I'm interested using elog for a lab notebook.  Once entries have been
> entered they cannot be changed/edited.
> Is it possible for elog to be setup to support something like this?  A write
> only mode?

What you need is an entry in the elogd.cfg file:

Manu commands = Back, New, Reply, Find, Config, Logout, Help

As you see, the "Edit" and "Delete" commands are missing here and therefore 
do not get displayed. So you can enter a message with "New", but you cannot 
change it afterwards.
  202   Fri Jan 31 20:47:51 2003 Reply Matthewgreggmc@yahoo.comInfo  Re: Write only
Does this truly disable the edit command or just hide it?

> > I'm interested using elog for a lab notebook.  Once entries have been
> > entered they cannot be changed/edited.
> > Is it possible for elog to be setup to support something like this?  A write
> > only mode?
> 
> What you need is an entry in the elogd.cfg file:
> 
> Manu commands = Back, New, Reply, Find, Config, Logout, Help
> 
> As you see, the "Edit" and "Delete" commands are missing here and therefore 
> do not get displayed. So you can enter a message with "New", but you cannot 
> change it afterwards.
  203   Fri Jan 31 21:09:47 2003 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chInfo  Re: Write only
> Does this truly disable the edit command or just hide it?

You're right! In some earlier versions, it did disable it, but in 2.2.5 it 
just hides it. I fixed that bug and from 2.3.0 on it will really disable 
that command again, such that if someone enters manually

http://midas.psi.ch/elogdemo/Forum/202?cmd=Edit

will produce and error if the command is not in the menu list.
  205   Thu Feb 6 15:46:11 2003 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestion  Re: Author attribute as a Quick Filter?
> When ELOG is configured for Self-Register=3, is it still possible
> to use the Author attribute as a Quick Filter? 
> 
> When I try it, the Author drop down box doesn't display anything.
> 
> Thanks,
> Eric

The "Quick Filter" facility only works for attributes which are avaiable as 
an "Options <attribute> = ..." list. So if you have a "free" attribute like 
the author, the systen would have to scan the whole logbook to find all 
possible authors, which would result in some unacceptable performance 
degradation. Nevertheless, in systems with a limited number of authors one 
can add the "options author = ..." statement to get the selection box. The 
behaviour is independent of the "Self-Register" setting.
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6