ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
Draft
|
Tue Jan 7 20:32:10 2025 |
| Evinrude Motor | minsonj2016@gmail.com | Bug report | Linux | elog-3.1.5-1 | Re: Segfault on elog-3.1.5-1 when uploading file. |
When will the new src be in the standard repos? I'm on ubuntu and
gary holman wrote: |
Thanks Stefen!
I built from source (ELOG V3.1.5-3a5f2f00) and I confirmed as fixed.
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Thanks to your stack trace, I found a case where a string might get overwritten, but only if the attachment file name is longer than 256 chars. I fixed the code and made a new RPM:
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/r37qx9aka5ytt3j7vn4km/elog-3.1.5-20241213.el8.x86_64.rpm?rlkey=knct99pdltggunrbmyr2hpfe5&st=pkre24aq&dl=0
Alternatively, you can compile from sources. Give it a try.
Stefan
|
|
|
69862
|
Tue Jan 7 20:35:23 2025 |
| Evinrude Motor | minsonj2016@gmail.com | Bug report | Linux | elog-3.1.5-1 | Re: Segfault on elog-3.1.5-1 when uploading file. |
When will the new source be in the standard download area ? I'm on ubuntu .
gary holman wrote: |
Thanks Stefen!
I built from source (ELOG V3.1.5-3a5f2f00) and I confirmed as fixed.
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Thanks to your stack trace, I found a case where a string might get overwritten, but only if the attachment file name is longer than 256 chars. I fixed the code and made a new RPM:
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/r37qx9aka5ytt3j7vn4km/elog-3.1.5-20241213.el8.x86_64.rpm?rlkey=knct99pdltggunrbmyr2hpfe5&st=pkre24aq&dl=0
Alternatively, you can compile from sources. Give it a try.
Stefan
|
|
|
69872
|
Sun Apr 13 13:56:05 2025 |
| Evinrude Motor | minsonj2016@gmail.com | Bug report | Linux | elog-3.1.5-1 | Re: Segfault on elog-3.1.5-1 when uploading file. |
So this never made it into the download area ? elog-latest.tar is elog-3.1.5-1 and contains no files from 2024 or 2025 .
Thanks
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
It is in the usual download area which is referenced at https://elog.psi.ch/elog/download.html
Stefan
Evinrude Motor wrote: |
When will the new source be in the standard download area ? I'm on ubuntu .
gary holman wrote: |
Thanks Stefen!
I built from source (ELOG V3.1.5-3a5f2f00) and I confirmed as fixed.
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Thanks to your stack trace, I found a case where a string might get overwritten, but only if the attachment file name is longer than 256 chars. I fixed the code and made a new RPM:
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/r37qx9aka5ytt3j7vn4km/elog-3.1.5-20241213.el8.x86_64.rpm?rlkey=knct99pdltggunrbmyr2hpfe5&st=pkre24aq&dl=0
Alternatively, you can compile from sources. Give it a try.
Stefan
|
|
|
|
|
180
|
Sun Dec 22 16:49:20 2002 |
| Etienne Van Caillie | etienne.vancaillie@mba.be | Question | | | email notification to a specific adress |
I have some problem with email notification
for some logbooks I would like to notify only to specific adress
I try
Email All = adress1, adress2
Elog send well at 'adress1' and 'adress2'
but also to all of other users ?
how to restric these only to 'adress1 and adress2 ?
is it possible to notify according to attribue value like
Attributes = Test1, Test2
Email All = $Test1
or concatenation of $Test1 + '@mba.be' for example
Thanks
this is a wonderfull tools !
to improve documentation : true example are missing too much 'theorie'
but when I'm finish I'll put true sample on the net |
182
|
Sat Jan 4 17:55:49 2003 |
| Etienne Van Caillie | etienne.vancaillie@mba.be | Comment | | | Re: logbook db size causing very slow response |
> Was wondering if there were any tweaks/suggestions for improving the
> logbooks responsiviness. Our logbook was started 31 July 01. Since that
> time we have went from 1 logbook to 4 logbooks. Logbook 1 having 2651
> entries, logbook 2 having 300 entries, and the last 2 are new logbooks, so
> only a few entries.
>
> When user launches the logbook website, it takes considerable time to bring
> the site up. It seems to be directly related to the number of entries in
> the logbook. If I set up a dummy site with a couple logbooks and only a
> few entries, the logbook is very fast coming up as well as saving entries.
>
> Another thing that seems to slow the site down, is the number of users in
> the elog notification list (those who've subscribed). When you save a log
> entry, it takes around 30sec or longer for it to actually complete the
> save. If I remove the list of users from the notification list and just
> have a few, the save is very fast.
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Eric
2600 entries is too much for this application as it load the all files
in computer memory
expand the server memory
Are you running on linux or Windows ? I suggest linux (faster)
We are working on the C source to move all data from flat to database like
SQL or mysql
when a parameter flag like 'status' = "OK" for instance
I suggest also to split in several logbook
but this is depend on your 'ELOG' parametrisation and logics
If your data are not 'sensitive' I can check on my linux server
Etienne |
185
|
Mon Jan 6 19:53:28 2003 |
| Etienne Van Caillie | etienne.vancaillie@mba.be | Bug report | | | security in find option as a guest |
if you are guest in the find option
select 'all logbook'
it will display all 'attributes' from other logbook
with no option 'guest command ...'
but having the same 'attribute' name
Solution :
**********
I use the copy to command to make a copy to other logbook
with option 'guest command' enabled
in this section I remove some field so the guest user can't no see all field
I suggest to give acces to 'guest' on a second run of elog to another
port or other computer ? |
187
|
Tue Jan 7 16:04:14 2003 |
| Etienne Van Caillie | etienne.vancaillie@mba.be | Bug report | | | Re: security in find option as a guest |
> > if you are guest in the find option
> >
> > select 'all logbook'
> >
> > it will display all 'attributes' from other logbook
> > with no option 'guest command ...'
> > but having the same 'attribute' name
> >
> > Solution :
> > **********
> > I use the copy to command to make a copy to other logbook
> > with option 'guest command' enabled
> >
> > in this section I remove some field so the guest user can't no see all
field
> >
> > I suggest to give acces to 'guest' on a second run of elog to another
> > port or other computer ?
>
> I see your problem. I could either disable the "Search all logbooks" switch
> for certain logbooks (like the guest one), or restrict the search to
logbooks
> which have a "guest command" option. What would you prefer?
>
> - Stefan
may be add a parameter
Restrict Search all logboog = 1 or 0
if 1 the switch will not appear |
192
|
Fri Jan 10 15:10:53 2003 |
| Etienne Van Caillie | etienne.vancaillie@mba.be | Bug fix | | | Re: security in find option as a guest |
> > may be add a parameter
> >
> > Restrict Search all logboog = 1 or 0
> > if 1 the switch will not appear
>
> The flag "Search all logbooks" is already there! (I forgot about it!). So
> just set it to "0" and you should be fine.
>
> - Stefan
I do and it work fine |