| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
1172
|
Sat Jun 4 10:59:52 2005 |
 | Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Windows | 2.6.0-beta | Re: Incorrect Display |
I finally found some time to fix the pippo-bug  .
It had to do with the request that one can turn on and off the summary lines of the text body in Guest list display. So if this option does not contain Text, the text summary is not shown for guest access, but only for registered access. This modification had the side effect that one column was dropped on the non-guest access. |
|
1178
|
Mon Jun 6 12:25:53 2005 |
 | Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Bug report | Linux | 2.6.0-beta | shell exec not working |
It seems that, since Fri 2005-06-03, 12:50 almost, the shell exec feature is not invoked anymore.
the -x flag is present in the command line and the elog.cfg Parameters are present both for edit and for insert..
I'm not disabling shell exec by the checkbox
the dummy-level log in syslog does not show *anything* about shell exec. |
|
1179
|
Mon Jun 6 12:28:21 2005 |
| Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Bug report | All | 2.6.0-beta | elog & firefox pipelining |
Having the Firefox pipelining feature enabled makes elog unable to correctly show avery attachment in the full view when a quite large number of them is present..
disabling pipelining makes all works fine again |
|
1180
|
Mon Jun 6 12:43:48 2005 |
| Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Bug report | Linux | 2.6.0-beta | Re: shell exec not working |
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | It seems that, since Fri 2005-06-03, 12:50 almost, the shell exec feature is not invoked anymore.
the -x flag is present in the command line and the elog.cfg Parameters are present both for edit and for insert..
I'm not disabling shell exec by the checkbox
the dummy-level log in syslog does not show *anything* about shell exec. |
oh my @#[#@ .. sorry stefan, my bad ... for some reason the make_thumbs script was not +x ..
Is it possible to check the executability of the script in elog and eventually tell about this in syslog ?  |
|
1181
|
Mon Jun 6 15:17:50 2005 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | All | 2.6.0-beta | Re: elog & firefox pipelining |
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | Having the Firefox pipelining feature enabled makes elog unable to correctly show avery attachment in the full view when a quite large number of them is present..
disabling pipelining makes all works fine again |
As is said:
Pipelining is an experimental feature, designed to improve page-load performance, that is unfortunately not well supported by some web servers and proxies.
So what do you expect
I have not checked in detail, but it seems that the browser fires off several requests in parallel, one for each image. This can only be handled by a multi-threaded server, which elog is not (yet). What is more an issue for elog in relation to multi-threading is that one long request blocks all other users. So if I do a synchronize for example from home, the server can be nonresponsive for a minute or two. I have some plans for making it multi-threaded, but as you can imagine this is not so simple to do in a portable way. |
|
1183
|
Tue Jun 7 13:12:25 2005 |
 | Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Bug report | All | 2.6.0-beta | Re: elog & firefox pipelining |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | Having the Firefox pipelining feature enabled makes elog unable to correctly show avery attachment in the full view when a quite large number of them is present..
disabling pipelining makes all works fine again |
As is said:
Pipelining is an experimental feature, designed to improve page-load performance, that is unfortunately not well supported by some web servers and proxies.
So what do you expect
I have not checked in detail, but it seems that the browser fires off several requests in parallel, one for each image. This can only be handled by a multi-threaded server, which elog is not (yet). What is more an issue for elog in relation to multi-threading is that one long request blocks all other users. So if I do a synchronize for example from home, the server can be nonresponsive for a minute or two. I have some plans for making it multi-threaded, but as you can imagine this is not so simple to do in a portable way. |
You are right .. I'll wait the m-t support then  ghghgh |
|
1184
|
Tue Jun 7 15:48:53 2005 |
 | Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Bug report | Linux | 2.6.0-beta | Menu text ignored?? |
I tried to insert a row in the menu but it seems to totally ignore the command ...
both inserting a filename and simply typeing "Menu text = <b>PIPPO</b>" brings to a page with *no* "PIPPO" in the HTML source ...
is this a bug or another my misconfiguration??? |
|
1185
|
Tue Jun 7 16:52:27 2005 |
| Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Bug report | All | 2.6.0-beta | Find seems to ignore Start Date |
It seems that making a search in which one selects *only* a start date *and* a "last" number of days
does not works correctly ..
Elog infact simply ignores the start date, showing the last N-days entries ..
This is a bug IMHO, and prevents me to include a quick filter for user, making easy to select a particular year/week in a JS calendar and than using this date as the start date for the logbook ...
here is an example: http://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/?mode=threaded&reverse=1&npp=8&ma=6&da=14&ya=2004&last=7
If one specify *also* an "end date" the beaviour is correct.. |