| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
1273
|
Fri Jul 15 15:03:01 2005 |
 | Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Bug report | All | | Re: short/long_name should point the same user |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | uhm.. I think the confusion intrinsict in elog between long and short name is something to be solved ..
an attribute of type "userlist" fills always with the long_name .. but if I would to insert it as short ?
the users shown in the users admin dropdown menu is short .. why? .. may be I didnt understood the way this issue works ..  |
The "short name" is the equivalent to the unix login name. Under /etc/passwd, you have a login (short) name and a "full" (long) name. The first may not contain blanks, must be unique, while the second is more like a "real" name. This concept has been adapted in elog. While many people use cryptic or abbreviated login names, it's still nice know the real name, like if you get an email notification from someone. The userlist fills with the long_name because people refer to other people in the logbook usually with the real name (sometimes they even don't know the people's login name). The admin dropdown menu uses the short names because you look at the user database more from an administration point of view. Like if you edit /etc/passwd, you first look at the login name, not the full one. Maybe what one could add is to make the full name in the admin page a dropdown list as well, so the admin can either select the short or the long name. Another item for the wishlist |
uhmm .. what I am talking about is something simpler ... It seems to me that elog does not use always the "login name" but somethins refers to the "gecos" ... What I'm askinf for is to separe the login name (to which elog has to refer for everything internally) and the long/short_name mechanism that should be a mere display issue ...
May be that it is the same to ask for the introdution of a "user_id" or to treat the login name as the uid, .. the "Author" field should be filled both with the long and the short name (and it is so now!) but, when checking the original author on a Edit action, aelog as to check always the actual logged *short* name against the original Author *short* name .. becoise is only the short name that should have a sense for messages .. the long one is only a nice reminder 
Hope my english makes me to be understod now  |
|
1274
|
Fri Jul 15 17:28:33 2005 |
| Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Request | All | | Re: < img > in Display Attribute |
the very usefull thing my request will enable is the following:
Options Category = Info,Report,[B]Problem[I]{1}[/I][/B],Other
Preset Category = Info
Display Category = <img style="border:0; float:left; margin-right:5px" src="icons/$category.png">$category
[B]{1}[/B]ROptions Level = Notice,Warning,Alert,Fixed
{1}Preset Level = Warning
[B]{1}Display[/B] Category = <img style="border:0; float:left; margin-right:5px" src="icons/[B]$level[/B].png">[B]$category[/B]
note that this way I could use a single field to have the both the category name and the level icon .. this is specially usefull for a "problem" or "bug" category, becouse this way one can see status of the "bug"..
.. I'd really like conditional Display  |
|
1276
|
Mon Jul 18 10:09:06 2005 |
| Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Request | All | | Re: < img > in Display Attribute |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: | I added an escape character. If you write <b> or [b], then it gets interpreted. If you write \<b> or \[b] with the "\" in front of the tag, it does not get interpreted, thus the '\' works like an escape character. I edited your old entry with the <img> in the subject, and as you see it is now not interpreted.
The modification is in CVS and documented in the ELCode help. |
Ok, it's a good solution for me ... as using a <pre> html tag does not seem to preserve an <img> tag .. |
|
1277
|
Mon Jul 18 10:16:35 2005 |
 | Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Bug report | Linux | rev 1.703 | Display Subject and HTML tags, regression |
rev 1.703 makes the following code not to work:
Display Subject = <b>$subject</b>
the <b> tag is displayed and not interpreted, as it was in previous revisions.. |
|
1278
|
Mon Jul 18 18:36:32 2005 |
| Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Bug report | Linux | rev 1.703 | Re: Display Subject and HTML tags, regression |
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | rev 1.703 makes the following code not to work:
Display Subject = <b>$subject</b>
the <b> tag is displayed and not interpreted, as it was in previous revisions.. |
this patch should fix the problem .. a little bug still remain, if you insert some allowed HTML tags in the subject this is detected by is_html() so the Display Attribute and the Link is not applied .. the result is that the HTML is working but no elog featur is applied |
|
1291
|
Thu Jul 21 09:31:35 2005 |
| Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Request | All | | Re: < img > in Display Attribute |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | the very usefull thing my request will enable is the following:
Options Category = Info,Report,[B]Problem[I]{1}[/I][/B],Other
Preset Category = Info
Display Category = <img style="border:0; float:left; margin-right:5px" src="icons/$category.png">$category
[B]{1}[/B]ROptions Level = Notice,Warning,Alert,Fixed
{1}Preset Level = Warning
[B]{1}Display[/B] Category = <img style="border:0; float:left; margin-right:5px" src="icons/[B]$level[/B].png">[B]$category[/B]
note that this way I could use a single field to have the both the category name and the level icon .. this is specially usefull for a "problem" or "bug" category, becouse this way one can see status of the "bug"..
.. I'd really like conditional Display |
You asked for ELCode tags not to be interpreted inside any [code] tag, but now the above entry gets screwed since you used it there! So no formatting any more in [code] section |
LOL |
|
1292
|
Thu Jul 21 10:59:22 2005 |
| Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Bug report | All | | Re: [code] should be a sort of <CDATA > |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | Using the [code] elocode should be intended also to preserve the tagged text from beeing parsed as html or elcode itself ..
this is an example:
| Quote: | Note that, for security reasons, you should check the MD5 FINGERPRINT of the SSL certificate issued by the server agaist the following one:
MD5 Fingerprint = 23:A7:AD:33:3C:08:BE:2A:62:6E:85:DF:B8:00:23:40
Thank you |
|
As you can see, your entry with the [code] section is now shown without interpretation. So everything between [code] and [/code] is not interpreted as ELCode tags. The modification is committed to CVS. |
thanks |
|
1293
|
Thu Jul 21 11:00:47 2005 |
| Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Bug report | Linux | rev 1.703 | Re: Display Subject and HTML tags, regression |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | rev 1.703 makes the following code not to work:
Display Subject = <b>$subject</b>
the <b> tag is displayed and not interpreted, as it was in previous revisions.. |
rev. 1.707 makes it work again  |
ok, nice |