Re: Buffer Overflow?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jan 19 10:31:05 2006
|
[quote="Chris Warner"]Users can access root level directories by using a modified URL. I saw on some security web sites that this was a problem in previous
versions. Was it not fixed in 2.6?
|
Re: Buffer Overflow?, posted by Chris Warner on Fri Jan 20 02:53:40 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Chris Warner"]Users can access root level directories by using a modified URL. I saw on some security web sites that this was
a problem in previous versions. Was it not fixed in 2.6?
|
|
Re: Bottom text = <file> not displayed in every screen?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jul 24 15:10:14 2003
|
> I tried to add a file with the "Bottom text = <file>" option.
>
> Although one would suggest that the bottom text file is included in every
|
|
Re: Boolean, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Aug 3 16:00:42 2007
|
[quote="Grant Jeffcote"]I've noticed in the latest release when using the 'Find' page that any boolean expression (tick box) is now shown as '0,1 or unspecified'.
Is this intentional? My colleagues are finding it hard to get their heads around what to choose and preferred the old 'Tick Box' option. Have there been
changes to the configuration arguments used for Boolean that I've missed?[/quote]
|
|
Re: Boolean, posted by Grant Jeffcote on Fri Aug 3 17:03:46 2007
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Grant Jeffcote"]I've noticed in the latest release when using the 'Find' page that any boolean expression (tick box) is now
shown as '0,1 or unspecified'. Is this intentional? My colleagues are finding it hard to get their heads around what to choose and preferred the old 'Tick
Box' option. Have there been changes to the configuration arguments used for Boolean that I've missed?[/quote]
|
|
Re: Boolean, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Aug 3 17:05:56 2007
|
[quote="Grant Jeffcote"]What are the chances of having a choice of the four options (as mentioned in your list) somehow so that when boolean-x is used (for
example) in the configuration file the applicable option text is shown in the 'Find' page?[/quote]
|
|
Re: Body of new messages not getting saved when submitted, posted by Sebastian Schenk on Sun Nov 21 23:49:42 2021
|
Hello Harry,
the elog server (elogd) is a standalone application written in C and contains a full webserver and logfile management system.
There are no other dependencies to apache or python. |
|
Re: Body of new messages not getting saved when submitted, posted by Harry Martin on Mon Nov 22 00:44:21 2021
|
Thank you for your quick response, Sebastion. The new version of ckeditor is 4.5.7 -- is this version compatible with elog 3.1.2? It is possible
that I am using an outdated elog or outdated ckeditor due to the fact that this server is a bit old; I am looking to upgrade this machine soon, but I have
several other issues to resolve first. |