Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 623 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
    icon14.gif   Re: BUG?: Preset text = causes replication of text when re-editing a logbook entry., posted by Steve Jones on Wed Jul 28 22:33:08 2004 
> > With the "Preset text = " specified, when re-editing a logbook entry (say to
> > correct a spelling error) the text of the "Message" is replicated and placed
> > directly below the original text.
> 
> That should be fixed since revision 1.370 from Jul 7th, 2004. Please update.

Thanks!
    icon2.gif   Re: BUG: lost entry data, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Nov 24 11:52:26 2004 
> After THREE tries to enter a long detailed list of questions, all have been 
> replaced by just one:  why do ELOG textareas and entry forms lose all data 
> if the browser goes back/forward?  Or if a submission causes an error?  
> Other forms in other applications don't have this kind of data loss.
> 
> Submitting this now before I lose it again.  Will submit rest of questions 
> as separate entries.

Really strange. I tried with Mozilla Firefox and IE 6.0 and none of them lost
the entry data. What browser did you use? As far as I learned, data only
vanishes on pages which have an HTTP header containing "Expires: ..." with a
date in the past. But I made sure that the entry form does not contain this.

Please refreain in the future from sending many small entries. People being
registered with email notifications on the forum get flooded by notifications.
In worst case, write your posting using an editor and do copy-and-paste into a
single posting.
    icon2.gif   Re: BUG: lost entry data, posted by Rich Persaud on Wed Nov 24 19:05:53 2004 
> > After THREE tries to enter a long detailed list of questions, all have been 
> > replaced by just one:  why do ELOG textareas and entry forms lose all data 
> > if the browser goes back/forward?  Or if a submission causes an error?  
> > Other forms in other applications don't have this kind of data loss.
> > 
> > Submitting this now before I lose it again.  Will submit rest of questions 
> > as separate entries.
> 
> Really strange. I tried with Mozilla Firefox and IE 6.0 and none of them lost
> the entry data. What browser did you use? As far as I learned, data only
> vanishes on pages which have an HTTP header containing "Expires: ..." with a
> date in the past. But I made sure that the entry form does not contain this.

IE 6.0.   

I am accessing an internal ELOG instance through an Apache reverse proxy on port
80, per the FAQ.  Just tested without the proxy and there is no data loss problem
with back/forward.  

When I access the ELOG forum, I am going through a forward proxy to the Internet,
which probably explains the data loss on error messages.

Will investigate proxy configuration regarding "Expires: " headers and post here
if I find a solution.

> Please refreain in the future from sending many small entries. People being
> registered with email notifications on the forum get flooded by notifications.
> In worst case, write your posting using an editor and do copy-and-paste into a
> single posting.

Sorry about that, will do.
    icon2.gif   Re: BSOD, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Mar 19 16:45:07 2018 

The dump does not help me much. I need to reporduce the problem in a controlled environment.

Stefan

Ales Novak wrote:

Hi,

I have been using elog for a few years and it is a wonderfull software and has been one that I can't go without. So thank you very much for making it. smiley

After about a year, I upgraded to the latest version. I noticed that it causes the system to crash. It doesn't seem to happen that often. 

I have installed this on 2 machines, one Windows 10 and one on Windows 7. Over the last week I got one BSOD on each OS. 

The elogs have different configs and logbooks. One is a simple elog that doesn't have any attachments or anything funky. Just straight text.

Please see attached a screenshot of the Memory.DMP which has happned seconds after an schedule restarted the elog service on my PC. 

I will keep monitoring and see if will happen again. But I thought I log it here anyway.

Thanks.

Cheers.

Ales.

 

    icon2.gif   Re: Automatically generated incrementing tags (#), posted by soren poulsen on Wed Oct 14 16:46:57 2009 

soren poulsen wrote:

Hi,

I am using the # character to generate automatically incrementing numbers for new messages.

My issue is that # is evaluated when you hit "New" but E-log is only aware of the new value being used when you hit "Submit".

So, two E-logs can have the same value substituted for # if two E-logs are being edited in parallel.

Maybe someone has a solution to this ?

Soren Poulsen

 

 

The solution is to use "Subst" instead of "Preset".

    icon2.gif   Re: Automatically generated incrementing tags (#), posted by soren poulsen on Mon Oct 26 15:43:55 2009 

soren poulsen wrote:

soren poulsen wrote:

Hi,

I am using the # character to generate automatically incrementing numbers for new messages.

My issue is that # is evaluated when you hit "New" but E-log is only aware of the new value being used when you hit "Submit".

So, two E-logs can have the same value substituted for # if two E-logs are being edited in parallel.

Maybe someone has a solution to this ?

Soren Poulsen

 

 

The solution is to use "Subst" instead of "Preset".

 This is not really resolved, since "Subst" creates a new number on both "New" and "Reply". I would like "Subst" to create a new number only on "New" and preserve this number through replies throughout the thread. I would like to be able to say "Subst thread = #" to make a new number for the thread and combine it with "Subst on reply thread = $thread" to preserve the number on replies, but this does not work. Maybe someone has already done this ?

Soren

    icon2.gif   Re: Automatically generated incrementing tags (#), posted by soren poulsen on Sun Nov 8 23:29:35 2009 

soren poulsen wrote:

soren poulsen wrote:

soren poulsen wrote:

Hi,

I am using the # character to generate automatically incrementing numbers for new messages.

My issue is that # is evaluated when you hit "New" but E-log is only aware of the new value being used when you hit "Submit".

So, two E-logs can have the same value substituted for # if two E-logs are being edited in parallel.

Maybe someone has a solution to this ?

Soren Poulsen

 

 

The solution is to use "Subst" instead of "Preset".

 This is not really resolved, since "Subst" creates a new number on both "New" and "Reply". I would like "Subst" to create a new number only on "New" and preserve this number through replies throughout the thread. I would like to be able to say "Subst thread = #" to make a new number for the thread and combine it with "Subst on reply thread = $thread" to preserve the number on replies, but this does not work. Maybe someone has already done this ?

Soren

 This can be solved with something like "Subst <attr> = $shell(cmd...) where cmd calculates a new value of attr, as a function of #, when attr does not already have a value. This thread is closed.
 

Soren

 

    icon2.gif   Re: Automatically generated incrementing tags (#), posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Nov 10 14:42:11 2009 

soren poulsen wrote:

soren poulsen wrote:

soren poulsen wrote:

Hi,

I am using the # character to generate automatically incrementing numbers for new messages.

My issue is that # is evaluated when you hit "New" but E-log is only aware of the new value being used when you hit "Submit".

So, two E-logs can have the same value substituted for # if two E-logs are being edited in parallel.

Maybe someone has a solution to this ?

Soren Poulsen

 

 

The solution is to use "Subst" instead of "Preset".

 This is not really resolved, since "Subst" creates a new number on both "New" and "Reply". I would like "Subst" to create a new number only on "New" and preserve this number through replies throughout the thread. I would like to be able to say "Subst thread = #" to make a new number for the thread and combine it with "Subst on reply thread = $thread" to preserve the number on replies, but this does not work. Maybe someone has already done this ?

Soren

I just reworked the "Subst" command to make it more consistently. Now "Subst on Edit" and "Subst on Reply" are executed after the entry submission,  and they are mutually exclusive. So all you need right now is

Subst Tag = #

and it will not increment when editing or replying to an existing entry. The fix is in SVN revision 2264.

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6