ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
67307
|
Fri Aug 10 11:47:49 2012 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.9.0-2411 | Re: Authentication problem with wget and links (text browser) |
cowden wrote: |
Hello,
I'm not able to authenticate to a logbook using my text based browser links, so I've started investigating with wget hoping solving the problem one will lead to a solution for the other. I've seen some examples on how to use wget to parse logbook entries in this forum, but my attempts keep returning the login page. Any advice would be helpful and appreciated. Here are a couple of the command line arguments I've tried:
wget --save-cookies cookie.txt --keep-session-cookies -d "http://hostname/LOGBOOK?unamee=YYY&upassword=XXX" -O elog.txt
wget --save-cookies cookie.txt --keep-session-cookies -d --post-data="redit=&uname=YYY&upassword=XXX&remember=1" -e robots=off "http://hostname/LOGBOOK" -O elog.txt
After these executions, my cookies.txt file remains empty. Running subsequent command with "--load-cookies=cookies.txt" still points me to the login page.
Many Thanks,
Chris
|
I've just checked that 'wget --no-check-certificate --save-cookies cookie.txt --keep-session-cookies -d "https://elog-gfa.psi.ch/SLS?uname=uuu&upassword=ppp" -O elog.txt'
created a file cookie.txt. The file contains three lines of data if uname and upassword are a valid login, and it is empty (beside of three comment lines) if they are not a valid login (wrong user or wrong password).
Could it be related to the set-up of your particular logbook? |
67041
|
Fri Apr 1 16:13:44 2011 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Comment | Linux | 2.9.0-2402 | Re: Authentication error message |
soren poulsen wrote: |
It is very good to have Kerberos authentication available. It is just the error message which is a bit cryptic.
If you enter your Kerberos password once, and later fail to authenticate with a wrong password, you get:
Kerberos error:
Decrypt integrity check failed.
Please check your Kerberos configuration
That is not really urgent!
Soren
|
Can you tell me how to reproduce this? If I do it here, I just get back to the login page:

Maybe it has to do with your specific Kerberos implementation? What server are you using?
|
67046
|
Mon Apr 11 19:31:23 2011 |
| soren poulsen | soren.poulsen@cern.ch | Comment | Linux | 2.9.0-2402 | Re: Authentication error message |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
soren poulsen wrote: |
It is very good to have Kerberos authentication available. It is just the error message which is a bit cryptic.
If you enter your Kerberos password once, and later fail to authenticate with a wrong password, you get:
Kerberos error:
Decrypt integrity check failed.
Please check your Kerberos configuration
That is not really urgent!
Soren
|
Can you tell me how to reproduce this? If I do it here, I just get back to the login page:

Maybe it has to do with your specific Kerberos implementation? What server are you using?
|
I am sorry but I cannot reproduce this any more. It happened several times when I was testing different kinds of wrong user input to the authentication dialog but now there is no issue any longer. However, there has been other issues lately in this domain and it may be that the Kerberos installation has been patched by our automatic update installation.
Case closed! Thanks anyway for responding.
Soren |
65698
|
Fri Jan 18 14:20:29 2008 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | | Re: Audit Trail? |
Javier A. Ortiz wrote: |
First thanks for the great software! My only question would be how to implement audit trail feature. I know you can control who edits and that's great but in regulated environments like mine there's a requirement that the original record, the one edited, is not deleted or overwritten. If not possible right now the only thing I could think of is a mechanism, maybe possible thru configuration, that when the record is edited it is copied to an audit trail logbook (i.e. if logbook name is 'test' it's audit logbook will be named 'test-audit' which is read only) and have a link to the audit trail of the record (show only changes of the current record).
I'm more than aware that it's possible thru configuration but I'm short on that dept. Any help/idea?
|
You can achieve this via replies. First you disable any edits on the original message by removing the Edit command via 'Menu commands' or by using 'Restrict edit time' appropriately. If someone wants to edit an entry, she or he makes a reply. If the original entry is formatted with ELCode, it will be enclosed by a [quote] tag, which can be easily removed. Then the text can be edited and submitted. This way you get the history of an entry in a chain of replies. That's the only way I see to accomplish this functionality.
|
67036
|
Wed Mar 30 13:46:01 2011 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Info | Linux | Windows | ELOG V2.7 | Re: Attributes for message workflow. |
Ryan wrote: |
[...] I am even open to losing the historical "status" and beeing able to change all entries on the thread on reply. (i.e. Reply #4 changes "Status" to "Approved", and the system changed all entries in the thread to "Approved")
|
One possibility is to use the new 2.9.0 feature "Propagate attributes = OPS Approval, ENG Approval, Director Approval"
A change in any of the three listed attributes would propage to the corresponding fields of all former entires of the same thread.
So if someone creates a reply and changes "OPS Approval" to "Approved", the field "OPS Approval" of the original entry would go as well to "Approved".
I just happen to know about this feature because Stefan implemented it for me :-) |
2083
|
Sat Nov 18 17:13:22 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | | | Re: Attributes according to users |
ather khan wrote: | Hi,
Is it possible to have certain attributtes available to certain user in one log boolk.
We have log book where the supervisor assign jobs to employees and we want only supervisor to have assign to attributes available and others only to view it.
|
You cannot restrict the modification if certain attributes, but you can restrict edits in general with the command
Allow edit = <name of admin>
You can also restrict the New, Delete, etc. commands to be only executable by the supervisor. |
66109
|
Fri Dec 12 08:07:59 2008 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Mac OSX | 2.7.5 | Re: Attribute value lost when adding to another extendable attribute |
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
Here is an excerpt from my config file:
Type Last Edit = datetime
Preset Last Edit =$entry time
Locked Attributes = Last Edit
Subst on edit Last Edit = $date
Preset on Duplicate Last Edit = $date
I have another attribute called Part that I've made extendable.
When I duplicate an entry, Last Edit is updated with the current date correctly. However, as soon as I click the Add Part button next to my extendable Part attribute, and the page reloads to show the entry box for the Part field, the Last Entry field is replaced with a "-".
I have to submit and then re-edit the entry to get Last Edit to have a valid value again.
*EDIT*:
I noticed that any time the page reloads while in the entry screen this happens, e.g. by selecting plain instead of html format.
|
Thanks for reporting that problem. It has been fixed in SVN revision 2156. |
66112
|
Sat Dec 13 02:13:51 2008 |
| Dennis Seitz | dseitz@berkeley.edu | Bug report | Mac OSX | 2.7.5 | Re: Attribute value lost when adding to another extendable attribute |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
Here is an excerpt from my config file:
Type Last Edit = datetime
Preset Last Edit =$entry time
Locked Attributes = Last Edit
Subst on edit Last Edit = $date
Preset on Duplicate Last Edit = $date
I have another attribute called Part that I've made extendable.
When I duplicate an entry, Last Edit is updated with the current date correctly. However, as soon as I click the Add Part button next to my extendable Part attribute, and the page reloads to show the entry box for the Part field, the Last Entry field is replaced with a "-".
I have to submit and then re-edit the entry to get Last Edit to have a valid value again.
*EDIT*:
I noticed that any time the page reloads while in the entry screen this happens, e.g. by selecting plain instead of html format.
|
Thanks for reporting that problem. It has been fixed in SVN revision 2156.
|
Excellent! Thank you. |