Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 629 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
 Find |  Login |  Help 
 Full | Summary | Threaded | Hide attachments  Show all entries    6460 Entries 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 628, 629, 630 ... 806, 807, 808   Next  
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Versiondown Subject
  1230   Thu Jul 7 02:41:40 2005 Reply Tim Fowlertimfowler1@gmail.comQuestionLinux2.5.9+r167Re: changing the default to plain text rather than elcode

Stefan Ritt wrote:

John Habermann wrote:
I just shifted our elogs to a new server and in the process upgraded to the latest debian version which is 2.5.9+r1674-1. I am just wondering how to change the default for the text body area from "elcode" to plain text? I can't see anything in the admin configuration syntax guide and the HTML default = 2 option no longer seems to work.


The HTML default option has been replaced by the Default encoding option, with which one can set the default encoding style to plain text (Default encoding = 1).


John Habermann wrote:
Also is there anything in particular that you have to do to get the elcode editor to work. Although the elcode buttons appear highlighting text and clicking on them doesn't actually do anything although it works fine in my browser when using these elog forums. I don't get any errors in mozilla but trying it in IE under cxoffice gives an "error on page" message in the bottom of the browser.


The ELCode editor requires the JavaScript file elcode.js to be present in the scripts directory under your elog root directory. Future installations will handle this correctly.


The installation did not include scripts directory. Where can I download the elcode.js file?
  1236   Thu Jul 7 08:38:11 2005 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux2.5.9+r167Re: changing the default to plain text rather than elcode

Tim Fowler wrote:
The installation did not include scripts directory. Where can I download the elcode.js file?


I said future installations will handle this. This feature is still in beta becaus it's not finished completely. You can get the elcode.js from CVS.

- Stefan
  1241   Thu Jul 7 22:31:40 2005 Reply Tim Fowlertimfowler1@gmail.comQuestionLinux2.5.9+r167Re: changing the default to plain text rather than elcode
I said future installations will handle this. This feature is still in beta becaus it's not finished completely. You can get the elcode.js from CVS.

- Stefan


Thanks Stefan! This is an excellent application.
  1412   Thu Sep 8 03:37:44 2005 Reply Noah PnaQuestionLinux2.5.9+r167Re: changing the default to plain text rather than elcode
I, too, found that this elcode.js file was missing. However, it seems to be present on this demo site!

so, I downloaded it from this very demo site, and saved it to my system (in the root of your resources folder). This (so far) seems to have made the "ELCode" formatting mode work properly.

This is the URL I used. It seems that this file was ommitted from the latest distribution:

http://midas.psi.ch/elogs/elcode.js

Hope that helps!
  1137   Mon May 9 20:23:59 2005 Question Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comQuestionLinux | Other2.5.9Version of GCC to use?
What is the recommended version of gcc to use with elog 2.5.9?  I searched
the discussion database but found nothing pertaining to this. 

Thanks
  1138   Mon May 9 20:47:02 2005 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux | Other2.5.9Re: Version of GCC to use?
> What is the recommended version of gcc to use with elog 2.5.9?  I searched
> the discussion database but found nothing pertaining to this. 

Well, the same code compiles on gcc and on Visual C++ under Windows, so
hopefully there is no dependence on the gcc version (;-)

I use gcc 3.2.3 on Scientific Linux 3.03.
  1139   Mon May 9 20:51:23 2005 Reply Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comQuestionLinux | Other2.5.9Re: Version of GCC to use?
> > What is the recommended version of gcc to use with elog 2.5.9?  I searched
> > the discussion database but found nothing pertaining to this. 
> 
> Well, the same code compiles on gcc and on Visual C++ under Windows, so
> hopefully there is no dependence on the gcc version (;-)
> 
> I use gcc 3.2.3 on Scientific Linux 3.03.

I ask because I get a dependency that I did not have before with 2.5.3. 
Compiling with my same 'ole gcc 2.95.2 I see that I now need mxml.h and
strlcpy.h.  Trying to compile under gcc 3.4 results in all kinds of errors.
  1140   Mon May 9 20:55:36 2005 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux | Other2.5.9Re: Version of GCC to use?
> I ask because I get a dependency that I did not have before with 2.5.3. 
> Compiling with my same 'ole gcc 2.95.2 I see that I now need mxml.h and
> strlcpy.h.  Trying to compile under gcc 3.4 results in all kinds of errors.

mxml.h and strlcpy.h are part of the elog tar ball. When untar'ed, they get copied
into a separate directory:

...
-rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke      15090 2005-05-09 13:09:54 elog-2.5.9/eloglang.japanese
-rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke      17587 2005-05-09 13:09:54 elog-2.5.9/eloglang.spanish
drwxr-xr-x ritt/lke          0 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/
-rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke      45577 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/mxml.c
-rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke       2198 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/strlcpy.c
-rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke       4359 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/mxml.h
-rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke        567 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/strlcpy.h

I have right now no access to 3.4. Once I get it, I will address the errors
occuring there.
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 628, 629, 630 ... 806, 807, 808   Next  
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6