Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 631 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icondown Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  66731   Sat Mar 6 20:06:24 2010 Question David Spindlerdsspindler@gmail.comQuestionWindows2.7.7Re: Fail to connect to SMTP server on WinXP but works on Win2K

Fantastic. I forgot the icon and when I resent nothing was left. 

Here goes again!

I have been running Elog for years on a Win2K machine with no email problems. I have been forced to move it to a WinXP machine and I always get this message under WinXP: "Error sending Email via "netsvr10.prod.company.com": Cannot connect to server"

 

I noticed this a long time ago but was not concerned until I wqas forced to use WinXP. We have years of data in the Elog and to lose the use of it would hinder our operation a lot.

 

Here is an entry from the elog.log file when it worked under Win2K:

28-Oct-2009 18:28:38 [609144@199.82.127.9] {Generals} NEW entry #0
28-Oct-2009 18:28:38 [609144@199.82.127.9] {Generals} Email from <christophermeyer@fedex.com> to david.spindler@company.com, SMTP host smtp.mail.company.com
28-Oct-2009 18:28:42 [609144@199.82.127.9] {Generals} 220 netsvr10.prod.company.com -- Server ESMTP (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit))

 

Here is an entry from today's elog.log under WinXP that does not work.

06-Mar-2010 11:48:23 [117361@127.0.0.1] {Gbld} NEW entry #0
06-Mar-2010 11:48:23 [117361@127.0.0.1] {Gbld} Email from <david.spindler@company.com> to david.spindler@company.com, SMTP host smtp.mail.company.com
06-Mar-2010 11:48:23 [117361@127.0.0.1] {Gbld} READ entry #1612

We use an SMTP server without authentication.
 

  66734   Mon Mar 8 16:16:39 2010 Question Mads Jessenmcj@dmi.dkQuestionWindows2.6.1-1642Wrong author when replying a reply

When replying on a reply, the author is set to the author on the original reply? Othervice it workes great!

part of code:
...
Preset Author = $long_name
Locked Attributes = Author
Subst on reply author = $long_name
...

 

 

  66737   Thu Mar 11 12:01:35 2010 Question Thomastheitz@gmx.deQuestionWindows2.7.8Summary text field is empty for replied entries

It is possible to show the (new) text of a replied entry in the summary text field ?

Actually only for the original entries the text was shown in the text column of the summary report, not for the replies.

 

  66762   Mon Mar 15 09:29:11 2010 Question Bertram MetzBertram.Metz@ge.comQuestionWindows2.7.8Invalid URL for groups beneath top groups in overview page

Hi,

I'm trying to implement top groups and started with the sample configuration shown in the 'Syntax of elogd.cfg' chapter of the documentation. But now I'm facing a problem with the links in the logbook selection page.

Here's my group configuration:

Group Linux PCs = Red Hat, Debian, Mandrake
Group Windows PCs = NT, XP

Top group engineering = Linux PCs, Windows PCs
Top group administration = Employees, Purchases
Show top groups = 1
 

The selection page for the top groups is displayed correctly, but the URL for the groups beneath the top group is incorrect. The URL for the Linux PCs group for instance is http://localhost:8080/engineering/engineering/ . The URLs for the logbooks within the Linux PCs groups is correct (e.g. http://localhost:8080/Debian/)

Has anybody an idea what's going wrong in y configuration?

Bertram

Attachment 1: elogd.cfg
[global]
Port=8080
Logbook tabs = 1
Expand selection page = 0
;Main tab = "Overview"
Use Lock = 1
Default encoding = 1
Resolve host names = 0


Logfile = elogd.log
Logging level = 3

Logout to main = 1
Options Author = BMetz  
Admin user = BMetz

Password file = ./passwd
;Protect selection page = 0

Group Linux PCs = Red Hat, Debian, Mandrake
Group Windows PCs = NT, XP

Top group engineering = Linux PCs, Windows PCs
Top group administration = Employees, Purchases
Show top groups = 1


[Red Hat]
Comment = Red Hat Logbook
Time format = %Y-%m-%d 

[Debian]
Comment = Debian Logbook
Time format = %Y-%m-%d 

[Mandrake]
Comment = Mandrake Logbook
Time format = %Y-%m-%d 

[NT]
Comment = NT Logbook
Time format = %Y-%m-%d 

[XP]
Comment = VR11/VP11
Time format = %Y-%m-%d 

[Employees]
Comment = Employess
Time format = %Y-%m-%d 

[Purchases]
Comment = Purchases
Time format = %Y-%m-%d 
  66767   Tue Mar 16 11:58:55 2010 Question soren poulsensoren.poulsen@cern.chBug reportLinux2.7.8-2282Re: Thread view problem in searches

soren poulsen wrote:

soren poulsen wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

soren poulsen wrote:

That sounds fine but I think there is a problem with rendering under Opera. I enclose a screen shot: There is too much white space in the lines, it seems $

The problem only appears in Find

 I just tried myself with V10.50, and things work fine, even in the find page:

Capture.png

Can you try on the forum, just to check if it's specific to your configuration?

 Thanks. The Forum is fine. The problem is - apparently - specific to my installation. The white space origins in long sequences of "&nbsp" (repeated); in the lines in Find.

Let me re-install with the latest version and see if I can solve it like that.

Soren

 I have re-installed the latest, fastest, smartest, brightest version. And it all works perfectly! Thanks a lot for your help.

Soren

 Everything is fine. But my users do not like that the threads are broken into individual entries and not shown as full threads as before. So I am stuck with the "old" version. This is probably asking for too much but would it be difficult to have a flag to specify if you want to benefit from the new behaviour or keep pre-2282 behaviour (with its inconvenience which led to the presentation change). It could even be a compile tag flag, if it just me (well, my users) who is asking for this.

Soren

  66780   Sun Apr 4 11:26:19 2010 Question siva kumarsivakumarkp@fastmail.fmQuestionWindows2.7.8 background color and font

Stefan,

i recently download the elog server for windows and configured. its working with me fine

i would like to configure my elog server for to display a different color when am giving a specific "value" for a attribute "Status".

from the documentation i found to use the

Style Status Fixed = background-color:green

but with this configuration, the entire raw will be with red color or the specified color. i am looking only for that specific box (Status column) to be with specific color.

my configuration is as follows

Attributes = Author, Type, Category,  Subject, Location, Problem Description, Status

Options Status = Fixed, Under Process, Not Fixed

Style Status Fixed  = background-color:green

Style Status Not Fixed  = background-color:red

Style Status Under Process  = background-color:yellow

Am attaching two images, one is current display and next one is what i am looking for

am not sure about will it possible or not.  please guide me. if it possible with javascript please tell me how i can include a external javascript for this pupose.

Thanks in advance

siva

Attachment 1: current.jpg
current.jpg
Attachment 2: looking_for.jpg
looking_for.jpg
  66784   Wed Apr 14 12:55:38 2010 Question Pedro Gil de Araújo Gordopedro.gordo@me.comQuestionMac OSX2.7.8"No SMTP host defined in [global] section of configuration file" error

Hi

When I upload a message with a attachment (and also without an attachment) I get this message:

"No SMTP host defined in [global] section of configuration file"

However the file and the text have been uploaded. So why does it gives me this message, and how do I work this out?

Best Regards

Tirwit

  66792   Thu Apr 22 09:51:07 2010 Question Diogo Alvesdiogomiguelalves@gmail.comQuestionLinux2.7.7Recursively open a new attribute of the same type

Hi,

I have a logbook which, among other things, contains these attributes:

Options Ingredient = Egg, Oil

Options Quantity = 2, 0.1L

Now, I would like to, every time I select an ingredient and respective quantity, that another Ingredient and Quantity field opens up for me to procede addind them.

I've searched in the documentation and found nothing related to this. Maybe I missed it. Is it possible to do this?

Also, is there a way to display 2 attributes in the same row? Messing with CSS is probably the only answer ... correct?

 

Thank you very much,

Diogo

 

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6