Re: Question, posted by nickc1 on Tue Apr 15 12:17:12 2003
|
> > Is there a way to hide logbooks from all views.
> >
> > Basically i want to use the move function to move old entries to another
> > logbook but only want administrators to be able to see the logbooks in
the
> > view, everyone will just see the primary ones.
> >
> > At the min im having to put Archive logbook, everyone is complaining at
me
> > that there is too many to choose from :)
> >
> > Any suggestions ?
>
> What about grouping the archive logbooks into a logbook group? Like:
>
> Group Pubilc = Logook1, Logbook2, ...
> Group Archive = Archive1, Archive2, ...
>
> So if a "normal" user is in the public group, it only sees Logoook1, ...
and
> a single tab "archive", which is then (I hope) not too much to choose from.
I tried that but on the summary screen it displays a list of all the logbook
regardless of group, also im not using public groups im using a seperate
password file. |
Re: Question, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Apr 15 13:00:40 2003
|
> I tried that but on the summary screen it displays a list of all the
logbook
> regardless of group, also im not using public groups im using a seperate
> password file.
Ah, you mean by "summary screen" the initial logbook selection screen where
each logbook is displayed in one line. For that case, I just added a
flag "Hide from selection". If set to "1", this logbook is not dispalyed
among the list of logbooks. Is this what you want? New version under CVS. |
Re: Question, posted by nickc1 on Wed Apr 16 13:28:38 2003
|
> > I tried that but on the summary screen it displays a list of all the
> logbook
> > regardless of group, also im not using public groups im using a seperate
> > password file.
>
> Ah, you mean by "summary screen" the initial logbook selection screen where
> each logbook is displayed in one line. For that case, I just added a
> flag "Hide from selection". If set to "1", this logbook is not dispalyed
> among the list of logbooks. Is this what you want? New version under CVS.
Yes thats wicked perfect, now im prob being thick but is there a way to hide
logbook tabs in the same way, as i dont really want to use groups as the
people that use the system arent really techie and the titles will confuse
them :)
Im trying to make it idiot proof for them
Cheers |
Re: Question, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Apr 17 09:29:14 2003
|
> Yes thats wicked perfect, now im prob being thick but is there a way to
hide
> logbook tabs in the same way, as i dont really want to use groups as the
> people that use the system arent really techie and the titles will confuse
> them :)
Well, I changed the flag from "hide from selection = 1" to "hidden = 1",
which hides it now also from the logbook selection tabs on the top row. But
this means that the only way to access the hidden logbooks is by entering
their URL directly (or from a bookmark). I'm not sure how useful this is...
New version under CVS. |
Re: Question, posted by nickc1 on Sat Apr 19 11:09:33 2003
|
> > Yes thats wicked perfect, now im prob being thick but is there a way to
> hide
> > logbook tabs in the same way, as i dont really want to use groups as the
> > people that use the system arent really techie and the titles will
confuse
> > them :)
>
> Well, I changed the flag from "hide from selection = 1" to "hidden = 1",
> which hides it now also from the logbook selection tabs on the top row. But
> this means that the only way to access the hidden logbooks is by entering
> their URL directly (or from a bookmark). I'm not sure how useful this is...
>
> New version under CVS.
Thats perfect, administrator such as myself can access those books directly
from the URL, and can be used as an archive logbook running in sync with the
live one, so hold records such as completed tickets in a request system once
completed can be moved to the archive logbook.
Cheers fella that is gonna help me a great deal. |
Re: 'Reply' removes attachments from the original message, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Apr 22 17:16:31 2003
|
> It seems when I use "reply" with an attachments, the original attachments of
> the message are removed.
>
> I use elog-2.3.5
>
> Alexander.
Please see elog:280 . I will releae 2.3.6 with this bugfix somewhen during
this week.
- Stefan |
Re: 'Reply' removes attachments from the original message, posted by Alexander ZVYAGIN on Tue Apr 22 17:20:19 2003
|
> > It seems when I use "reply" with an attachments, the original attachments of
> > the message are removed.
> >
> > I use elog-2.3.5
> >
> > Alexander.
>
> Please see elog:280 . I will releae 2.3.6 with this bugfix somewhen during
> this week.
>
> - Stefan
Wow! Fast reply!!! Thanks a lot! |
Re: problem with 20+ attachments, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Apr 22 17:21:36 2003
|
> It seems that maximal number of attachments is about 20. When you try to add
> more, a new entry _is_ added to the logbook but the refernce to it is not
> added to the web page.
Uhhh, Mr. "monster of number of attachments" gave it's stroke! Well, we never
had such large number of attachments so I forgot to put a waring in. The
limit comes from
#define MAX_ATTACHMENTS 20
in elogd.c which you can easily increase (as long as you have RAM!) and
recompile. |