New ELOG version with XML and CSV import/export, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Mar 26 09:41:56 2004
|
Version 2.5.2 of ELOG has been released today. It contains CSV (comma
separated values) import and export, as well as XML export (through the
"Find" page). Since these features are new, I would appreciate some feedback
|
|
Re: New ELOG version with XML and CSV import/export, posted by Charles Duncan on Mon Mar 29 17:44:32 2004
|
> Version 2.5.2 of ELOG has been released today. It contains CSV (comma
> separated values) import and export, as well as XML export (through the
> "Find" page). Since these features are new, I would appreciate some feedback
|
Re: New ELOG version with XML and CSV import/export, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Mar 29 18:06:46 2004
|
> I was able to find the export feature under find. Could you let me know where
> the import feature is? Or how I turn it on.
|
Formatting parameters for attributes, posted by Ulrich Trüssel on Fri Jun 25 20:09:21 2004
|
I have some problems of understanding how the "Format <attribute>" parameter
is working. It may be, that there was a similar question in the forum, but I
didn't find it. I'm sorry if I come back with an old question.
|
|
Re: Formatting parameters for attributes, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jul 7 16:00:10 2004
|
> I have some problems of understanding how the "Format <attribute>" parameter
> is working. It may be, that there was a similar question in the forum, but I
> didn't find it. I'm sorry if I come back with an old question.
|
|
Re: Formatting parameters for attributes, posted by Ulrich Trüssel on Fri Jul 9 19:17:03 2004
|
Thank you Stefan! Just was out of the office for some days.
There ar 2 questions in addition:
|
|
multiple "text entry" field, posted by darshak on Mon Jul 12 09:07:32 2004
|
| Is it possible to add one more "text entry" field ? |
|
Re: multiple "text entry" field, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Jul 12 09:31:03 2004
|
> Is it possible to add one more "text entry" field ?
I guess you mean the main body text, which is multi-line. No, this is not
|