ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
66412
|
Thu Jun 25 09:07:51 2009 |
| Michael Husbyn | michael.husbyn@gmail.com | Bug report | Windows | 2.7.6 | Re: (my) Firefox breaks Elog with this config file |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Michael Husbyn wrote: |
Hi, Did a fresh install on a Windows 2003 server (and tried it on my personal computer) After startup I can click on Norway/nor, and then the server just stops responding. I see in the log nothing, the last line: Received unknown cooke "style" Then it stops responding and after a few seconds I see the dos window returns to commandline prompt. Probably a very bad config file. On Windows XP it informs we of Dr Watson, memory could not be read message. Using Firefox 3.0.11 But if I use IE 7, no problem at all.. Any suggestion? Best regards Michael Husbyn |
This must be related to the unknown cookie "style". There was some work recently on elog to make it robust against unknonw cookies. The latest modification was on version 2192, and you probably have an older version. I made a release elog276-2.exe for you. Try it and let me know. You can also just delete your cookies in Firefor and it should be fine, but it's better not being able to crash elog. |
Sure I will try, but I cannot find the version you are talking about in the download section. Should I find it there or any other place?
Thanks for quick feedback |
66413
|
Thu Jun 25 09:26:00 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Windows | 2.7.6 | Re: (my) Firefox breaks Elog with this config file |
Michael Husbyn wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Michael Husbyn wrote: |
Hi, Did a fresh install on a Windows 2003 server (and tried it on my personal computer) After startup I can click on Norway/nor, and then the server just stops responding. I see in the log nothing, the last line: Received unknown cooke "style" Then it stops responding and after a few seconds I see the dos window returns to commandline prompt. Probably a very bad config file. On Windows XP it informs we of Dr Watson, memory could not be read message. Using Firefox 3.0.11 But if I use IE 7, no problem at all.. Any suggestion? Best regards Michael Husbyn |
This must be related to the unknown cookie "style". There was some work recently on elog to make it robust against unknonw cookies. The latest modification was on version 2192, and you probably have an older version. I made a release elog276-2.exe for you. Try it and let me know. You can also just delete your cookies in Firefor and it should be fine, but it's better not being able to crash elog.
|
Sure I will try, but I cannot find the version you are talking about in the download section. Should I find it there or any other place? Thanks for quick feedback |
It's here. |
66415
|
Thu Jun 25 10:21:10 2009 |
| Michael Husbyn | michael.husbyn@gmail.com | Bug report | Windows | 2.7.6 | Re: (my) Firefox breaks Elog with this config file |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Michael Husbyn wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Michael Husbyn wrote: |
Hi, Did a fresh install on a Windows 2003 server (and tried it on my personal computer) After startup I can click on Norway/nor, and then the server just stops responding. I see in the log nothing, the last line: Received unknown cooke "style" Then it stops responding and after a few seconds I see the dos window returns to commandline prompt. Probably a very bad config file. On Windows XP it informs we of Dr Watson, memory could not be read message. Using Firefox 3.0.11 But if I use IE 7, no problem at all.. Any suggestion? Best regards Michael Husbyn |
This must be related to the unknown cookie "style". There was some work recently on elog to make it robust against unknonw cookies. The latest modification was on version 2192, and you probably have an older version. I made a release elog276-2.exe for you. Try it and let me know. You can also just delete your cookies in Firefor and it should be fine, but it's better not being able to crash elog.
|
Sure I will try, but I cannot find the version you are talking about in the download section. Should I find it there or any other place? Thanks for quick feedback |
It's here. |
Looks more stable, but it still quits. Sometimes just entering the logbook, sometimes when I hit the config button.
==== Return ================================
<549 bytes of favicon.ico>
TCP connection broken
GET /nor/elog.rdf HTTP/1.1
Host: XXSERVERNAMEHEREXX:8091
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2
009060215 Firefox/3.0.11 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
Accept-Language: en-gb,en;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate
Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7
Keep-Alive: 300
Connection: keep-alive
Cookie: elmode=Summary
and just quits
Strange |
66416
|
Thu Jun 25 10:51:12 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Windows | 2.7.6 | Re: (my) Firefox breaks Elog with this config file |
Michael Husbyn wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Michael Husbyn wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Michael Husbyn wrote: |
Hi, Did a fresh install on a Windows 2003 server (and tried it on my personal computer) After startup I can click on Norway/nor, and then the server just stops responding. I see in the log nothing, the last line: Received unknown cooke "style" Then it stops responding and after a few seconds I see the dos window returns to commandline prompt. Probably a very bad config file. On Windows XP it informs we of Dr Watson, memory could not be read message. Using Firefox 3.0.11 But if I use IE 7, no problem at all.. Any suggestion? Best regards Michael Husbyn |
This must be related to the unknown cookie "style". There was some work recently on elog to make it robust against unknonw cookies. The latest modification was on version 2192, and you probably have an older version. I made a release elog276-2.exe for you. Try it and let me know. You can also just delete your cookies in Firefor and it should be fine, but it's better not being able to crash elog.
|
Sure I will try, but I cannot find the version you are talking about in the download section. Should I find it there or any other place? Thanks for quick feedback |
It's here.
|
Looks more stable, but it still quits. Sometimes just entering the logbook, sometimes when I hit the config button. ==== Return ================================ <549 bytes of favicon.ico> TCP connection broken GET /nor/elog.rdf HTTP/1.1 Host: XXSERVERNAMEHEREXX:8091 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2 009060215 Firefox/3.0.11 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729) Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8 Accept-Language: en-gb,en;q=0.5 Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7 Keep-Alive: 300 Connection: keep-alive Cookie: elmode=Summary and just quits Strange |
Ah, the GET /nor/elog.rdf gave me somt hint: Your Firefox browser checks the RSS feed of elog regularly. If the logbook is empty, the routing producing the elog.rdf file went into some kind of infinite loop, but this only happens on an empty logbook. If fixed this and updated the 276-2 file just now, so try again. |
66417
|
Thu Jun 25 11:04:53 2009 |
| Michael Husbyn | michael.husbyn@gmail.com | Bug report | Windows | 2.7.6 | Re: (my) Firefox breaks Elog with this config file |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Michael Husbyn wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Michael Husbyn wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Michael Husbyn wrote: |
Hi, Did a fresh install on a Windows 2003 server (and tried it on my personal computer) After startup I can click on Norway/nor, and then the server just stops responding. I see in the log nothing, the last line: Received unknown cooke "style" Then it stops responding and after a few seconds I see the dos window returns to commandline prompt. Probably a very bad config file. On Windows XP it informs we of Dr Watson, memory could not be read message. Using Firefox 3.0.11 But if I use IE 7, no problem at all.. Any suggestion? Best regards Michael Husbyn |
This must be related to the unknown cookie "style". There was some work recently on elog to make it robust against unknonw cookies. The latest modification was on version 2192, and you probably have an older version. I made a release elog276-2.exe for you. Try it and let me know. You can also just delete your cookies in Firefor and it should be fine, but it's better not being able to crash elog.
|
Sure I will try, but I cannot find the version you are talking about in the download section. Should I find it there or any other place? Thanks for quick feedback |
It's here.
|
Looks more stable, but it still quits. Sometimes just entering the logbook, sometimes when I hit the config button. ==== Return ================================ <549 bytes of favicon.ico> TCP connection broken GET /nor/elog.rdf HTTP/1.1 Host: XXSERVERNAMEHEREXX:8091 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2 009060215 Firefox/3.0.11 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729) Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8 Accept-Language: en-gb,en;q=0.5 Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7 Keep-Alive: 300 Connection: keep-alive Cookie: elmode=Summary and just quits Strange |
Ah, the GET /nor/elog.rdf gave me somt hint: Your Firefox browser checks the RSS feed of elog regularly. If the logbook is empty, the routing producing the elog.rdf file went into some kind of infinite loop, but this only happens on an empty logbook. If fixed this and updated the 276-2 file just now, so try again. |
Looks like problem is fixed :)
Thanks for your help |
66013
|
Thu Oct 23 11:45:51 2008 |
| T. Ribbrock | emgaron+elog@ribbrock.org | Question | All | 2.7.5-2130 | Re: (How) can I hide columns in List view? |
T. Ribbrock wrote: |
[...]
One thing I don't understand for example is how does elog decide in List view which entry sets the condition? If all entries are set to the same value (in this example e.g. "Type1")? The first entry? Or am I missing something altogether? 
[...] |
By now, I'm one step further. List conditions = 1 does have some effect in some cases - the following works:
Options Type = Type1{10}, Type2{11}
Options StatusA = Status-A-red, Status-A-orange, Status-A
{10}Style StatusA Status-A-red = background-color:red
{11}Style StatusA Status-A-red = background-color:green
This seems to get evaluated "top-down", i.e. the value of "Type" in the first row in the list sets the handling of StatusA and the background-color, the second row for the third and so on. Unfortunately, this really only depends on the order of the rows on the screen - if I sort the list differently, I get a different result.
I am also quite certain that List conditions = 1 has no effect whatsover on List display - which is what I was hoping for. 
Hence, I'd like to repeat my question: Is there any way to hide columns in List view (short of editing the conf file...) - and if so, how?
Regards,
Thomas |
66024
|
Thu Oct 30 04:17:09 2008 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | All | 2.7.5-2130 | Re: (How) can I hide columns in List view? |
T. Ribbrock wrote: |
Originally, all information about our machines was stored in a spreadsheet with one sheet for the hardware of the machines and one for the software. By now, I've sucessfully moved the software part to an elog logbook and am now looking at transferring the hardware part as well.
As both lists are machine-name based, one of the options would be to merge both lists, as this would place all machine-related info into one logbook. The downside of this is that I get so many columns in list view that the result is quite unwieldy. Hence, I would like to hide some columns - ideally creating a "hardware view" and a "software view".
From the documentation, the only option I could find that seemed suitable was "List conditions". Unfortunately, I do not quite understand from the manual how this is supposed to work, so I'm quite possibly doing something wrong. I've tried this:
; General settings
List conditions = 1
; Attributes
Attributes = Type, Created, StatusA, StatusB, Archived
; Options & Tooltips
Options Type = Type1{10}, Type2{11}
; Conditionals
{10}List display = Edit, Type, Created, Status
{11}List display = Edit, Type, Created, StatusA, StatusB, Archived
but no matter how I set "Type", it does not seem to have any effect on the List display. One thing I don't understand for example is how does elog decide in List view which entry sets the condition? If all entries are set to the same value (in this example e.g. "Type1")? The first entry? Or am I missing something altogether? 
Also, if there are alternative ways how I could accomplish my goal, I'd also be most grateful for suggestions.
Thanks in advance,
Thomas
|
Indeed you got something wrong. The conditional attributes are meant for the input form, so you can turn some attributes on and off or choose different options for an attribute depending on the value of another attribute.
The only way I see how you can achieve what you want is to define two separate logbooks, but serve them from the same directory (via the "Data dir" option). Both logbooks should share the same attribute definition, but use different "List display" options. |
66028
|
Thu Oct 30 09:44:25 2008 |
| T. Ribbrock | emgaron+elog@ribbrock.org | Question | All | 2.7.5-2130 | Re: (How) can I hide columns in List view? | Thanks for the response! BTW: I did get a notification - but thanks for the "personal heads-up"! 
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Indeed you got something wrong. The conditional attributes are meant for the input form, so you can turn some attributes on and off or choose different options for an attribute depending on the value of another attribute.
[...]
|
I see. In that case, could you maybe please give a quick explanation what "List conditions" is supposed to do? In conjunction with your statement above I'm now thoroughly confused as to what it should/could be used for... 
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
[...]
The only way I see how you can achieve what you want is to define two separate logbooks, but serve them from the same directory (via the "Data dir" option). Both logbooks should share the same attribute definition, but use different "List display" options.
|
Ah, that's an idea - I'll look into that. Thanks a mil for the suggestion!
Regards,
Thomas |
|