| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
Draft
|
Tue Apr 12 09:06:49 2022 |
 | Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 3.1.4 (latest) | Re: "User stamp" icon like Time Stamp in Body |
<p> </p>
<table align="center" cellspacing="1" style="border:1px solid #486090; width:98%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="background-color:#486090">Gys Wuyts wrote:</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="background-color:#FFFFB0">
<p>Hello,</p>
<p>Is there a possibility to use like the time stamp a user stamp: by clicking the button in the main text entry it adds the username, just like the time stamp button does: Tue Apr 12 08:58:46 2022 ?</p>
<p>I searched but I'm not sure how this would be correctly named.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p> </p>
<p>G</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </p>
Tue Apr 12 09:06:49 2022 |
|
521
|
Fri Apr 2 02:41:36 2004 |
 | PJ Meyer | pjm@pjmeyer.org | Question | Windows | 1.35 to 2.51 | Re: "Upgrading" from 1.35 to 2.52 fails |
tuens out that the first log file was causing the problem. Elconv would just hang
on trying to convert it. renamed it, reran elconv, reload service and 2.51 elogd
and all was working as it should.
> Have a working copy of 1.35 running on NT4 server.
> Went to upgrade to latest version.
> Stopped service, installed the 2.52 version, restarted service and when
> trying to connect get nothing but server not found, dns errors, etc.
> Copy back the 1.35 elogd.exe and everything is fine - I can connect and add
> entries to log.
> Copy 2.52 elogd.exe and nothing.
>
> So being the bright boy, I unistalled E-log, went through the registry and
> yanked everything out that referenced ELOGD, rebooted, installed 2.52, made
> the necessary registry changes, started service and nothing.
>
> Stopped service and copied 1.35 Elogd.exe back into folder, started service,
> and everything works.
>
> Any ideas on why 1.35 works like a charm but 2.52 won't? I've tried stepping
> back to 2.10 version before giving up.
>
> This is a server that is patched to latest and runs quite well with 1.35. |
|
1570
|
Fri Dec 23 09:07:14 2005 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | | 2.6.0 | Re: "Syntax of elogd.cfg" - Document |
| Edmundo T Rodriguez wrote: | | The document "ELOG - Syntax of elogd.cfg" is outdated! |
I forgot to update the web server, but the document distributed in the 2.6.0 package was up to date.
| Edmundo T Rodriguez wrote: | | Are we going to have an updated documented? |
I copied the actual version to the web server.
| Edmundo T Rodriguez wrote: | How much difference exists between the one posted as a reference
and new one covering all new options in ELOG? |
For the changes from one version to the other, have a look at the changelog. |
|
1938
|
Mon Sep 18 18:56:19 2006 |
| Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Question | All | 2.6.2-1714 | Re: "Supress Email Notification" checkbox |
| Steve Jones wrote: | | Is there a way to allow email notification but have the "Suppress Email Notification" checked by default? We had complaints about the enormous amount of email so I turned off email notification for edits/replys, but there are times that I would like to allow email to be sent out -- this would imply allowing email by unchecking the "Suppress" box. |
What I think would be needed is:
Suppress Email on edit = 0|1|2
^
Where a '2' denotes that the "Suppress Email Notification" shows up but *checked* |
|
1948
|
Fri Sep 22 07:50:39 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | All | 2.6.2-1714 | Re: "Supress Email Notification" checkbox |
| Steve Jones wrote: |
| Steve Jones wrote: | | Is there a way to allow email notification but have the "Suppress Email Notification" checked by default? We had complaints about the enormous amount of email so I turned off email notification for edits/replys, but there are times that I would like to allow email to be sent out -- this would imply allowing email by unchecking the "Suppress" box. |
What I think would be needed is:
Suppress Email on edit = 0|1|2
^
Where a '2' denotes that the "Suppress Email Notification" shows up but *checked* |
Just to a
Suppress default = 1 |
|
1955
|
Fri Sep 22 19:42:21 2006 |
| Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Question | All | 2.6.2-1714 | Re: "Supress Email Notification" checkbox |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Steve Jones wrote: |
| Steve Jones wrote: | | Is there a way to allow email notification but have the "Suppress Email Notification" checked by default? We had complaints about the enormous amount of email so I turned off email notification for edits/replys, but there are times that I would like to allow email to be sent out -- this would imply allowing email by unchecking the "Suppress" box. |
What I think would be needed is:
Suppress Email on edit = 0|1|2
^
Where a '2' denotes that the "Suppress Email Notification" shows up but *checked* |
Just to a
Suppress default = 1 |
| Quote: |
Not quite what I am looking for. What I need is:
"New" Logs
- Always send an email -- do not provide an option to check the box.
-- use Suppress Default = 2
"Edits and Replys"
- Provide the option to send an email, but by default the "suppress" box is checked
-- need Suppress Email on edit = 2
|
|
|
1961
|
Mon Oct 9 22:32:11 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | All | 2.6.2-1714 | Re: "Supress Email Notification" checkbox |
| Suppress email on edit has been implemented in the current SVN revision just similar to the Suppress default flag having possible values of 0, 1, 2 and 3. |
|
1975
|
Tue Oct 10 23:27:41 2006 |
 | Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Question | All | 2.6.2-1714 | Re: "Supress Email Notification" checkbox |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: | | Suppress email on edit has been implemented in the current SVN revision just similar to the Suppress default flag having possible values of 0, 1, 2 and 3. |
Works like a champ! Thanks |