ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
884
|
Tue Jan 18 03:37:40 2005 |
| Neil Swartz | neilswartz@verizon.net | Question | All | 2.5.5 | Re: Find using multiple values with MOptions |
> > I have a logbook with an attribute that has a number of fixed values. I
> > use MOptions to prevent typos when entering and allow multiple "keywords".
> > When searching the users can only search on one keyword.
> > Is there any way to search on multiple values (AAA|BBB|CCC)? If I do not
> > use MOption, they can do this, but the users entering logs may mistype the
> > keywords.
>
> Even with Moptions, you can put into the "Text:" line
>
> (AAA|BBB|CCC)
>
> and click on "Search text also in attributes". This is a valid regular
> expression with searches for AAA or BBB or CCC. Unfortunately you still can
> mistype the values. If I would add check boxes in the find page, it would not
> be clear if one searches for an "AND" of several values or an "OR" (Most people
> would probably think that they want an "AND" because this happens if they
> restrict several attributes).
Yes, I can use the Text: search, but I still have the mistyping problem. (My
field values are like "ENA, ETB, HRES, etc.) -- Easy to have a typo.
Currently there is a dropdown when searching for MOption fields. Maybe you could
allow multiple selections in the dropdown. This to me is an "OR" search. |
885
|
Tue Jan 18 13:06:48 2005 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | All | 2.5.5 | Re: Find using multiple values with MOptions |
> Currently there is a dropdown when searching for MOption fields. Maybe you could
> allow multiple selections in the dropdown. This to me is an "OR" search.
Multiple selections are not possible in HTML, only a single value can be selected at
a time. |
886
|
Wed Jan 19 04:33:00 2005 |
| Neil Swartz | neilswartz@verizon.net | Info | All | 2.5.5 | Re: Find using multiple values with MOptions |
> > Currently there is a dropdown when searching for MOption fields. Maybe you could
> > allow multiple selections in the dropdown. This to me is an "OR" search.
>
> Multiple selections are not possible in HTML, only a single value can be selected at
> a time.
Try: (From monster.com)
<SELECT NAME="lid" multiple size="5">
<OPTION VALUE=""> ------- Select all -------- </OPTION>
<OPTION VALUE="323">Alabama-Anniston</OPTION>
<OPTION VALUE="324">Alabama-Birmingham</OPTION>
<OPTION VALUE="325">Alabama-Mobile/Dothan</OPTION>
<OPTION VALUE="328">Alabama-Montgomery</OPTION>
...
</SELECT>
Although this may not be supported in all browsers. (I think recent versions of
Netscape and IE support it) |
891
|
Fri Jan 21 23:30:35 2005 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Info | All | 2.5.5 | Re: Find using multiple values with MOptions |
<SELECT NAME="lid" multiple size="5">
Oh, nice, I didn't know of that. However, I prefer to have multiple options to be selected
with individual check boxes, this saves more vertical window space. So I added that
functionality to the find page. If more than one option of a MOptions attribute are
selected, they are or'ed together during the search. You can try that in this forum with
the "OS" for example. |
898
|
Tue Feb 1 14:41:08 2005 |
| Bee | ralphb.elog@spampot.com | Question | All | 2.5.5-2 | Finding Last Changed Entries |
Is there an inbuilt way to find the last entries changed in an elog?
I could add a "Last Mod" attribute and then config "Subst on edit Last Mod =
$date", but it occurred to me that this functionality might already be in
this wonderful tool somewhere, but I just haven't found it yet.
So, is it?
Best regards, Ralph. |
899
|
Tue Feb 1 14:44:00 2005 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | All | 2.5.5-2 | Re: Finding Last Changed Entries |
> Is there an inbuilt way to find the last entries changed in an elog?
>
> I could add a "Last Mod" attribute and then config "Subst on edit Last Mod =
> $date", but it occurred to me that this functionality might already be in
> this wonderful tool somewhere, but I just haven't found it yet.
>
> So, is it?
No it isn't. Not everybody wants it. So you have to do it in the way you
outlined it. Also have a look at http://midas.psi.ch/elog/faq.html#11
- Stefan |
912
|
Mon Feb 7 18:55:02 2005 |
| Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Bug report | All | 2.5.6 | HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails |
as this url shows http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/problems.html#amp
it should be used an HTML entity instead of the ampersand sign. |
913
|
Mon Feb 7 20:13:28 2005 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | All | 2.5.6 | Re: HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails |
> as this url shows http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/problems.html#amp
> it should be used an HTML entity instead of the ampersand sign.<p>
Can you please be a bit more specific? In which URL should the ampersand be
replaced? |