Date selection from the calendar widget does not work in Konqueror.  

Clicking on a date results in year being populated, but month and day are 
blank.

Can "Display" links work with multiple options? 

"ABC | DEF" is currently one link.

Ideally, it would be two links, each formatted per the "Display" string.

Is there a way to disable wildcard matching in searches?

A search for "1" returns "1" and "10" and "11".  

Is there a way to perform an explict match?

Could there be a numeric match if the attribute type is numeric?

Could there be a multi-value option for free text fields, e.g. comma-
separated?  This would allow multi-parent relationships between log items. 

E.g. specifying 12, 15 as a value would create unique Display links 
for "12" and "15", based on the Display specification for that attribute.

This would be like "multiple fixed options", for the purpose of formatting.

> After THREE tries to enter a long detailed list of questions, all have been 
> replaced by just one:  why do ELOG textareas and entry forms lose all data 
> if the browser goes back/forward?  Or if a submission causes an error?  
> Other forms in other applications don't have this kind of data loss.
> 
> Submitting this now before I lose it again.  Will submit rest of questions 
> as separate entries.

Really strange. I tried with Mozilla Firefox and IE 6.0 and none of them lost
the entry data. What browser did you use? As far as I learned, data only
vanishes on pages which have an HTTP header containing "Expires: ..." with a
date in the past. But I made sure that the entry form does not contain this.

Please refreain in the future from sending many small entries. People being
registered with email notifications on the forum get flooded by notifications.
In worst case, write your posting using an editor and do copy-and-paste into a
single posting.

> Is there any way to search for all attributes _except_ a certain value?

If you mean "search all attrubutes except one specific attribute" then the
answer is no.

> Can "Display" links work with multiple options? 
>
> "ABC | DEF" is currently one link.
>
> Ideally, it would be two links, each formatted per the "Display" string.

I don't understand your qyestion. You have an attribute with MOptions, so you
get "ABC | DEF" displayed in the list view. All links in each line point to
the individual entry, so what is the benefit of having two links for ABC and DEF?

> Is there a way to disable wildcard matching in searches?
> A search for "1" returns "1" and "10" and "11".  
> Is there a way to perform an explict match?
> Could there be a numeric match if the attribute type is numeric?

That should all be possible with the build-in regular expression. Just type

\b1\b

where "\b" means "word boundary". I agree that a numerical comparison for
numerical attributes would be better, I will put that on the to-do list.

> Could there be a multi-value option for free text fields, e.g. comma-
> separated?  This would allow multi-parent relationships between log items. 
> 
> E.g. specifying 12, 15 as a value would create unique Display links 
> for "12" and "15", based on the Display specification for that attribute.
> 
> This would be like "multiple fixed options", for the purpose of formatting.

Again, this is not clear to me. What do you mean by "display specification"?
Is it the "List display = ..." option or the "Format attribute = ..." option?
What is a "multi-parent relationship"? Why do you need multiple options for a
free text field? Why can't you use the MOptions specification?

> Date selection from the calendar widget does not work in Konqueror.  
> 
> Clicking on a date results in year being populated, but month and day are 
> blank.

I use following Javascript to populate the date:

function submit_day(day)
{
  opener.document.form1.d3.value = "24";
  opener.document.form1.m3.value = "11";
  opener.document.form1.y3.value = "2004";
  window.close();
}

which workes everywhere except in Konqueror. If you tell me how to convince
Konqueror to accept this, I'm happy to put it into the elog code.

> > Can "Display" links work with multiple options? 
> >
> > "ABC | DEF" is currently one link.
> >
> > Ideally, it would be two links, each formatted per the "Display" string.
> 
> I don't understand your qyestion. You have an attribute with MOptions, so you
> get "ABC | DEF" displayed in the list view. All links in each line point to
> the individual entry, so what is the benefit of having two links for ABC and DEF?

Display Subsystem = <a href="/LogBook1/?Subsystem=$Subsystem" style="color:
saddlebrown">$Subsystem</a>

ABC and DEF links would perform filter searches of a _different_ logbook.   

Separate links would perform separate searches.

> > Is there a way to disable wildcard matching in searches?
> > A search for "1" returns "1" and "10" and "11".  
> > Is there a way to perform an explict match?
> > Could there be a numeric match if the attribute type is numeric?
> 
> That should all be possible with the build-in regular expression. Just type
> 
> \b1\b
> 
> where "\b" means "word boundary". I agree that a numerical comparison for
> numerical attributes would be better, I will put that on the to-do list.

Thanks, this is very helpful.

> > Could there be a multi-value option for free text fields, e.g. comma-
> > separated?  This would allow multi-parent relationships between log items. 
> > 
> > E.g. specifying 12, 15 as a value would create unique Display links 
> > for "12" and "15", based on the Display specification for that attribute.
> > 
> > This would be like "multiple fixed options", for the purpose of formatting.
> 
> Again, this is not clear to me. What do you mean by "display specification"?
> Is it the "List display = ..." option or the "Format attribute = ..." option?
> What is a "multi-parent relationship"? Why do you need multiple options for a
> free text field? Why can't you use the MOptions specification?

MOptions does not work because the options are not fixed.   The options can be any
numeric ID for items in a related logbook.

Consider the case of two logbooks, where we wish to associate items in the second
logbook with more than one item in the first logbook.  We could define separate
attributes for each "parent item", e.g. Parent1, Parent2, Parent3, then use a
"Display" spec to convert a numeric ID into a hyperlink to the first logbook's item.
  The exact relationship is not important, could be parent/peer/child - some generic
relationship.

The benefit here would be the same as having separate links for MOptions attribute
values.