ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
68027
|
Wed Jun 17 19:20:40 2015 |
| Daniel Sajdyk | daniel.sajdyk@gmail.com | Question | Windows | ELOG V3.1.0-3c6 | Revisions in other languages |
Hello.
When I use "Revisions" name for attribute I have correct entry like "DATE by XXX from SOME_IP" which is added to previous edition date.
But when i rename Revisions attribute to polish language (like "Wersje"), the entry is preceded by 3c6435es and whole looks like "3c6435es DATE by XXX from SOME_IP" and it overwrite previous entry.
Is "Revisions" attribute must be in english?
Regards Daniel.
Edit:
I know what I was doing wrong. I use:
Subst on Edit Wersje = $Revisions<br>$date przez $long_name z $remote_host
but it should be:
Subst on Edit Wersje = $Wersje<br>$date przez $long_name z $remote_host
|
68038
|
Wed Jul 1 11:05:32 2015 |
| Daniel Sajdyk | daniel.sajdyk@gmail.com | Question | Windows | ELOG V3.1.0-3c6 | "Resolve host names" does not resolve host names |
Hello
I use Resolve host names = 1 in my config file, but I still get IP instead domain name.
I use elog in internal network with my own DNS.
Any sugesstions ?
Regards
Daniel. |
68040
|
Tue Jul 7 21:57:04 2015 |
| Erkcan Ozcan | erkcan@gmail.com | Question | Linux | 3.1.0-5be245e | Customized email subject line for an updated entry |
Hi,
The default email subject line for a new entry is: "New ELOG entry", and the default email subject line for an edited entry is: "Updated ELOG entry". However when we set "Use Email Subject", both new entries and the updated entries use the same email subject. Is there an equivalent of "Use Email Heading Edit" for the subject line? I tried "Use Email Subject Edit", to no avail.
Thanks in advance,
e. |
68045
|
Mon Jul 20 14:45:12 2015 |
| Marty Jansen | marimart@freeler.nl | Question | Windows | 3.1.0-c701f01 | FCKEditor not working correctly on a Windows server. |
Hi,
After working many years with previous versions of ELOG, I decided to update to the latest version.
I have installed ELOG version 3.1.0 on a WIndows 2012R2 server with IE 1. The editor is showing up, but everything is greyed out, execpt for some items on the bottom row. (Style, Lettertype...) and after I do load a preset text form with different colors, the page remains white. The tables and text in the form is showing up.
The previous version with the older editor was working great on the same server.
Any suggestions? |
68060
|
Wed Jul 29 23:07:41 2015 |
| Luca | rimbalzina@gmail.com | Question | Linux | ELOG V3.1.0-241 | Insert TimeStamp not working |
Hi,
I have an eLog logbook installed on my machine.
If I click on the INSERT TIMESTAMP botton in this post a Timestamp of the kind "Wed Jul 29 23:09:15 2015" is added.
When I do the same (with the same browser) on my logbook, nothing is added. Ideas about what might be causing this?
Regards
Luca |
68072
|
Wed Aug 5 02:59:50 2015 |
| William Wong | william.wong@fortisbc.com | Question | Windows | 3.0 | ELOG 3.0 plus and MS Windows issues. |
Greetings all. A few ELOG users have posted issues with ELOG 3.0 and newer not working with a variety of MS Windows operating systems,.
I have also encountered a similar problem in my environment.
For the following operating systems:
1) Windows XP SP3 (32-bit)
2) Windows Server 2003 SP 2 (32-bit)
when either elog.exe or elogd.exe are run from command line or file manager, the operating system reports the program is not a Win32 application.
I have other test computers that succesfully ran ELOG 3.0, 3.1 and 3.1.1
1) Windows Vista Enterprise (32-bit)
2) Windows 7 Professional (64-bit)
Has ELOG 3.x and newer changed in regards to support for MS Windows but is not documented on the
official ELOG documentation?
Any help would be most appreciated.
NOTE: The current production ELOG I use on Windows Server 2003 is 2.92-2475 but I would like to use the
features available on the 3,.x versions. Unfortunately, I am not able to change my production operating system.
|
68078
|
Wed Aug 12 16:59:30 2015 |
| Philip Leung | philip.leung@cern.ch | Question | Linux | Windows | 3.1.1 | Isolating search urls |
Hello all,
I am in need of isolating GET-requests referring to long-running, read-only elog functions such as search/filter/sort in our Apache proxy and redirecting them elsewhere. There does not, however, appear to be any easy way of reliably isolating these functions (with the exception of sort) by only looking at the URL.
Does anybody have any suggestions?
Regards,
Philip |
68080
|
Wed Aug 12 23:44:16 2015 |
| Eric Quintero | ericq@caltech.edu | Question | All | 3.0.0-70b274b | Show attachments = 0 |
I have "Show attachments = 0" set in [global], but attachments are shown in the "Full" view. Is this the intended behavior? Looking at individual entries correctly hides the attachments.
We use inline images often, so when an attachement is shown at the bottom of a post it is effectively a duplicate, which clutters things up a bit. |