Preset on duplicate, posted by Daniel Sajdyk on Mon Aug 31 22:35:03 2015
|
Hi.
Is there any way that "Preset on duplicate" contain ID entry from which it was duplicated?
|
Draft saved is treated as an entry edit, posted by Daniel Sajdyk on Fri Aug 28 21:01:42 2015 
|
Hello.
In Elog i have attribute called "Zmieniano" (eng. changed) which should store how many times entry was edited. If entry
was not edited it should have only preset value "oryginalny wpis" (eng. oryginal entry), but when I edit it, it should have also date, time, |
Re: Draft saved is treated as an entry edit, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Mon Aug 31 09:38:38 2015
|
Hi Daniel,
this is an undesired side effect of a new feature. I wouldn't call it a bug ;-)
There is no straight forward way for elog to distinguish between a "Submit" and an automatic save. Therefore the "... on edit |
|
Re: Draft saved is treated as an entry edit, posted by Daniel Sajdyk on Mon Aug 31 13:12:09 2015
|
Hi Andreas and thank you very much for explanation ;)
So, we'll have to wait for new version which will correct this.
|
|
Send e-mail based on a hierarchy of attributes?, posted by Phil Rubin on Mon Aug 24 20:40:14 2015
|
Is there a way to distribute e-mail based on the consideration of several attributes and values? A simple example: attributes type and category
have several different values, say, routine and problem for type and hardware and software for category, but one would only like messages sent when there's
a problem to different sets of hardware or software types. Thus: |
Re: Send e-mail based on a hierarchy of attributes?, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Wed Aug 26 09:18:17 2015
|
Yes, this can be done. See below for an example configuration.
Attributes = entrytype, category
Options entrytype = routine{1}, problem{2} |
Version 3.1.1 of elog has been released, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Aug 4 15:35:39 2015
|
Version 3.1.1, released August 4th, 2015
Updated CKEditor to version 4.5.1
Implemented "Date/Time format <attribute> = ..."
Implemented "Use Email Subject Edit = ..." |
|
Re: Version 3.1.1 of elog has been released, posted by Edmund Hertle on Thu Aug 20 14:23:43 2015
|
There seems to be a small problem with the new "Date/Time format <attribute>" implementation. It works great for the detailed view of
a single entry:
|
|
Re: Version 3.1.1 of elog has been released, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Aug 20 15:52:26 2015
|
Thanks for reportung that bug. I fixed it in revision f828049.
Edmund
Hertle wrote:
There seems to be a small problem with the new "Date/Time format |
|
Compiling for Windows, posted by Richard Stamper on Wed Aug 19 17:08:56 2015
|
I am interested in using LDAP authentication for elogd on Windows for which it looks like I need to compile from source, enabling LDAP in the make file.
Does anyone have advice on build environments for Windows in which they have had success making elog? Free ones preferably, such as
Cygwin. |
|
"Resolve host names" does not resolve host names, posted by Daniel Sajdyk on Wed Jul 1 11:05:32 2015
|
Hello
I use Resolve host names = 1 in my config file, but I still get IP instead domain name.
I use elog in internal network with my own DNS. |
|
Re: "Resolve host names" does not resolve host names, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Aug 4 13:33:14 2015
|
In elog I simplu use the function gethostbyaddr() to resolve the host name. If this does not work, the underlying OS does not know the hostname either.
Probably you can test this with "nslookup a.b.c.d", to see any further error message.
Daniel |
|
Re: "Resolve host names" does not resolve host names, posted by Daniel Sajdyk on Tue Aug 18 14:23:29 2015
|
I'm sorry... it was my mistake. I put Resolve host names in logbook config instead global.
Regards Daniel.
Stefan |
|
IE 11 - Text Edit Toolbar Not Working, posted by John Krautkramer on Sat Aug 15 00:00:36 2015
|
Hi,
I've been exploring elog. I find when using IE 11, the text editor formatting buttons don't work with HTML encoding selected. The entire
toolbar is grayed out. It appears to work fine with Chrome. Any ideas or direction to look? elog v3.1.1 is running on RedHat EL5. I've tried the |
|
Re: IE 11 - Text Edit Toolbar Not Working, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Mon Aug 17 09:27:45 2015
|
This reply has been written with IE 11 using the embedded HTML editor of ELOG. Therefore it is obviously not a problem of ELOG 3.1.1 with IE 11.
It could be a problem with your ELOG installation or it could be a problem with you IE 11 configuration. Can you use the HTML editor of this
forum with IE11? Did you install ELOG 3.1.1 on top of an existing ELOG installation? |
|
Re: IE 11 - Text Edit Toolbar Not Working, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Aug 17 09:55:16 2015
|
Also make sure you don't have "Compatibility Mode" turned on in IE11.
See here for example: http://winaero.com/blog/how-to-enable-compatibility-view-in-internet-explorer-11-ie11/
Andreas |
|
Re: IE 11 - Text Edit Toolbar Not Working, posted by John Krautkramer on Mon Aug 17 16:30:17 2015
|
The issue was IE Compatibility Mode. There were no websites in the list, but the "Display intranet sites in Compatibility View" was checked.
Removing this fixed it.
Thanks for the help! |
|
Isolating search urls, posted by Philip Leung on Wed Aug 12 16:59:30 2015
|
Hello all,
I am in need of isolating GET-requests referring to long-running, read-only elog functions such as search/filter/sort in our Apache proxy and
redirecting them elsewhere. There does not, however, appear to be any easy way of reliably isolating these functions (with the exception of sort) by only |
|
Re: Isolating search urls, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Aug 12 17:19:45 2015
|
I guess the underlying problem is the long time these requests take and block other users.
I have pretty high on my todo list to convert ELOG into a multi-threaded server which would fix this completely. So if you are patient enough
(=months) you might get what you want. |
|
Re: Isolating search urls, posted by Philip Leung on Thu Aug 13 10:06:23 2015
|
Thanks for the quick response!
It's great to hear that multi-threading is in the works as this has been my main issue with an otherwise very nice piece of software. I do,
however, feel like we should be able to get my slightly hacky approach to work to hold us over until you finish. |
|
Re: Isolating search urls, posted by Philip Leung on Mon Aug 17 10:32:51 2015
|
Is there no good way of differentiating search operations from others by URL?
Philip
Leung wrote:
Thanks for the quick response! |
|
Re: Isolating search urls, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Aug 17 10:41:22 2015
|
Look for "&subtext=" in the URL
Philip
Leung wrote:
Is there no good way of differentiating search operations from others |
|
Re: Isolating search urls, posted by Philip Leung on Mon Aug 17 11:17:37 2015
|
This only applies to searches which specify that they are searching through the message text though. It would not work for things like quick filter
Stefan
Ritt wrote:
Look for "&subtext=" in the URL |
|
Re: Isolating search urls, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Aug 17 11:26:22 2015
|
For any other filter you need "&<attribute>=", which of course requires the knowlede of all attributes. There is no other "standard"
flag in the URL indicating a search.
Philip |
|
Re: Isolating search urls, posted by Philip Leung on Mon Aug 17 11:28:08 2015
|
Would there be a simple way to redirect all URLs BUT the ones which trigger searches?
Stefan
Ritt wrote:
For any other filter you need "&<attribute>=", which |
|
Re: Isolating search urls, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Aug 17 11:36:49 2015
|
No, no and again: no.
Philip
Leung wrote:
Would there be a simple way to redirect all URLs BUT the ones which |
|
Re: Isolating search urls, posted by Philip Leung on Mon Aug 17 11:52:54 2015
|
Noted. Thank you for your time
Stefan
Ritt wrote:
No, no and again: no. |