We recently tried upgrading the ND280 elog instance to elog 3.1.0. [1] We seem to have some problems with this 'auto-save' functionality.  Specifically, it doesn't seem to play nice with the fact that we prefer to disable user's ability to edit old messages.  So we have (up to now), had the following set of commands specified in elogd.ccfg

Menu commands = List, New, Reply, Delete, Duplicate, Copy to, Move to, Find, Help

The problem is that we now get auto-saved messages, but no ability for the user to actually go back and finish the draft message.  You can see an example of this state in this test elog

http://neut17.triumf.ca:8080/demo/

Clicking on the draft message you can see that it can't be editted.  If you try to click 'new' then edit the draft, you get the message 'Error: Command "Edit" not allowed'.  So we had zombie draft messages, until we added the edit command back; but that defeats our preference that users not mess up old messages.

In general this auto-saving seems like a useful feature.  So the ideal solution for me would be to have some mode where users could edit/finish draft messages, but where we could still disable users from editting completed/finished messages.  Ie, where we can omit 'Edit' from the menu command, but still get auto-save.

A less ideal, but perhaps simpler solution would be that if an elog has omitted 'Edit' from the menu commands, then this auto-save/save functionality is disabled so that we don't get uneditable draft messages.

[1] https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/67855

Dear, sir! There is a problem with a configuration file.

The code was compiled by Cygwin (gcc-core, gcc-g++, make, gdb, libssl-dev).  After a compilation a reference to our own css-file was written in configuration file and css-file was included in a folder “themes/default” of the project.

The problem is that in running elog-3.1.4-1 (and upper versions) css-file name in a code of a page has some random symbols before file-name, for example: <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="ø9öÿeLogOUK.css">. It was found that the problem is resolved if a string “Password file=passwd” is deleted, but in this case it is impossible to set passwords to the users.

Here is an example of configuration file which is taken from the forum and just one string (CSS=elogOUK.css) has added to the code

[global]

; port under which server is listening

Port = 8080

CSS = eLogOUK.css

[Accelerator]

Comment = Accelerator Logbook

; use user level password access

Password file = passwd

Login expiration = 1000

Admin user = ritt

Self register = 1

; look and feel

Guest menu commands = Back, Find, Login, Help

Guest find menu commands = Find, Login, Help

Date format = %B %d, %Y

; attributes

Attributes = Author, Author Email, Category, Subject

Options Category = Routine entry, Shift summary, Problem, Fix, Question, Info, Other

Extendable attributes = Category

Required Attributes = Category, Subject

Thread display = $Subject, entered by $author on $Entry date

Quick filter = Date, Category

; title as shown in the browser

Page Title = Accelerator Logbook - $subject

; preset author and email

Preset Author = $long_name

Preset Author Email = $user_email

; these attributes cannot be changed

Locked Attributes = Author, Author Email

; only author can change its own entry

Restrict edit = 1

; options for reply

Subst on reply subject = Re: $Configuration Name

Remove on reply = Author, Author Email

; No Email notification

Suppress Email to users = 1

____________________________________________________________________

What can be done to resolve this problem?

Hi Stefan,

I had started to write a completely different bug report, but then realised I had not checked a detail.  I had written about one sentence.  So I decided to abort the message, and hit the "back" button.  Only I found that this had created a new entry in the elog listings.  I immediately went in and deleted it, but I had expected the "Back" button to have aborted the entry (as it does in 2.9.x) not to submit the entry!

It doesn't seem to have created an email, though.  And for the sake of all your users, I'd not want to experiment here on the matter too much!

Sorry to bother you with this, but I am not a programmer and this is probably a simple question but I need some help if someone has the time.

Under Global I have the command   -  SMTP host  = smtp.comcast.net

ELOG responds with  -  Error sending Email via "smtp.comcast.net": 5.1.0 sender rejected : invalid sender domain

Hi,

we have a problem. After windows updates, the elog service doesn´t start:

What can we do?

Best regards,

Markus

I am in the process of setting up a new ELOG logbook.  I checked out rev2280 from svn.savannah.psi.ch.  I knew I wanted to encrypt passwords, so when I compiled, I used flags

USE_SSL=1

and

USE_CRYPT=1

I am running Red Hat enterprise linux 3, glibc-devel-2.3.2-95.50, openssl-devel-0.9.7a-33.25

Everything seemed to be working fine--I was able to set up logbooks using both a password file as well as write passwords and make entries to the logs.  Then I tried to use the command line 'elog' to make an entry which failed to both logbooks.

/opt/elog/pro/elogd -c /opt/elog/pro/dansce_fancy.cfg -l Demo1 -w <mypassword>

Would change the password in dansce_fancy.cfg and I could make entries through the web interface, but

elog -h acouture -s -p 8081 -w <mypassword> -l Demo1 -a Author="Aaron Couture" -a Type=Routine  -m Sampleinfo.txt -x -n 1

failed with

Error: Invalid user name or password

I got the same behaviour when I used a logbook with a user/password pair defined in a password file.

When I looked at the output from running elogd with the -v flag, I could see that everything was being received on the server side, but that the password did not agree with the write password in dansce_fancy.cfg

I then recompiled elog with

USE_SSL=1

USE_CRYPT=

And then the elog command line entries worked, both with write passwords and a password file (after recreating the password file and the write password).  Looking at the elog.c source code, it appears that it does not know to use crypt rather then base64_encode when USE_CRYPT is true.  elogd.c defined different behaviour if USE_CRYPT is defined.

Thanks,

Aaron Couture