Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 672 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
IDdown Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject Text Attachments
  1149   Tue May 17 21:38:36 2005 Warning Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comBug reportAll2.5.9Logbook locking issue[I][B]Stefan, any ideas on this problem?[/B][/I]

[QUOTE]Our eLog is set to create logbook
  
  1148   Thu May 12 18:32:18 2005 Reply damon nettlesnettles@phgrav.phys.lsu.eduQuestionAll Re: post box question> > is there any way to get a larger text
box to type in when making a new post?
> > the default box is rather small and you
  
  1147   Wed May 11 21:39:12 2005 Reply Kevin Robinderkrobinder@visa.comBug reportWindows2.5.8Re: elogd crashes on log out> > Since updating to version 2.5.8 we have
been having problems with the elogd 
> > service crashing whenever anyone attempts
  
  1146   Mon May 9 23:30:11 2005 Agree Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comQuestionLinux | Other2.5.9Re: Version of GCC to use?> [ritt@pc5082 /tmp]$ tar -xzvf elog-2.5.9-2.tar.gz
> elog-2.5.9/
> elog-2.5.9/doc/
  
  1145   Mon May 9 21:22:46 2005 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux | Other2.5.9Re: Version of GCC to use?[ritt@pc5082 /tmp]$ tar -xzvf elog-2.5.9-2.tar.gz
elog-2.5.9/
elog-2.5.9/doc/
  
  1144   Mon May 9 21:17:29 2005 Agree Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux | Other2.5.9Re: Version of GCC to use?> Ok, now I see the issue - the tar extract
created the mxml directory in the root (not
> under the created directory elog-2.5.9).
  
  1143   Mon May 9 21:14:53 2005 Question Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comQuestionLinux | Other2.5.9Re: Version of GCC to use?> > > > I ask because I get a dependency that
I did not have before with 2.5.3. 
> > > > Compiling with my same 'ole gcc 2.95.2
  
  1142   Mon May 9 21:08:56 2005 Agree Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comQuestionLinux | Other2.5.9Re: Version of GCC to use?> > > I ask because I get a dependency that
I did not have before with 2.5.3. 
> > > Compiling with my same 'ole gcc 2.95.2
  
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6