Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 672 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
IDdown Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject Text Attachments
  1149   Tue May 17 21:38:36 2005 Warning Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comBug reportAll2.5.9Logbook locking issue[I][B]Stefan, any ideas on this problem?[/B][/I]

[QUOTE]Our eLog is set to create logbook
  
  1148   Thu May 12 18:32:18 2005 Reply damon nettlesnettles@phgrav.phys.lsu.eduQuestionAll Re: post box question> > is there any way to get a larger text
box to type in when making a new post?
> > the default box is rather small and you
  
  1147   Wed May 11 21:39:12 2005 Reply Kevin Robinderkrobinder@visa.comBug reportWindows2.5.8Re: elogd crashes on log out> > Since updating to version 2.5.8 we have
been having problems with the elogd 
> > service crashing whenever anyone attempts
  
  1146   Mon May 9 23:30:11 2005 Agree Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comQuestionLinux | Other2.5.9Re: Version of GCC to use?> [ritt@pc5082 /tmp]$ tar -xzvf elog-2.5.9-2.tar.gz
> elog-2.5.9/
> elog-2.5.9/doc/
  
  1145   Mon May 9 21:22:46 2005 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux | Other2.5.9Re: Version of GCC to use?[ritt@pc5082 /tmp]$ tar -xzvf elog-2.5.9-2.tar.gz
elog-2.5.9/
elog-2.5.9/doc/
  
  1144   Mon May 9 21:17:29 2005 Agree Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux | Other2.5.9Re: Version of GCC to use?> Ok, now I see the issue - the tar extract
created the mxml directory in the root (not
> under the created directory elog-2.5.9).
  
  1143   Mon May 9 21:14:53 2005 Question Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comQuestionLinux | Other2.5.9Re: Version of GCC to use?> > > > I ask because I get a dependency that
I did not have before with 2.5.3. 
> > > > Compiling with my same 'ole gcc 2.95.2
  
  1142   Mon May 9 21:08:56 2005 Agree Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comQuestionLinux | Other2.5.9Re: Version of GCC to use?> > > I ask because I get a dependency that
I did not have before with 2.5.3. 
> > > Compiling with my same 'ole gcc 2.95.2
  
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6