Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 678 of 807  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Versiondown Subject
  679   Tue Aug 31 20:29:20 2004 Question Patricio Castropato.castro@terra.clQuestionLinux2.5.3Options Items limits
Hello friends, 

Exist some form to increase limits of items (100) in the Options List



Thanks for any help
  681   Wed Sep 1 22:25:01 2004 Blink Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comQuestionLinux2.5.3Re: Options Items limits
> Hello friends, 
> 
> Exist some form to increase limits of items (100) in the Options List
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks for any help

I believe only through an edit of the C code and a recompile, as the values
are set as constants.  I think this might be the line:

#define MAX_N_LIST      100

So, yes, there exists a way and the ease of this way is dependent upon your
comfort level with changing stefan's code.
  686   Tue Sep 7 17:49:50 2004 Cool Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux2.5.3Re: Options Items limits
> > Hello friends, 
> > 
> > Exist some form to increase limits of items (100) in the Options List
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks for any help
> 
> I believe only through an edit of the C code and a recompile, as the values
> are set as constants.  I think this might be the line:
> 
> #define MAX_N_LIST      100
> 
> So, yes, there exists a way and the ease of this way is dependent upon your
> comfort level with changing stefan's code.

Agree. The only potential problem is that if this value becomes too big, you
will get a stack overflow from time to time. So best is experiment yourself a
bit. A avlue of 150 or so should be no problem.

- Stefan
  692   Wed Sep 8 15:37:09 2004 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux | Windows2.5.3Re: ELOG with stunnel won't show logbook
That bug has been fixed recently, please update to the newest version.
  741   Sun Oct 17 22:47:39 2004 Reply Glevineg@med.govt.nzQuestionOther2.5.3Re: ELOG e-mail notifications - their arrival time is wrong
Ok, i compiled the code below and ran it,
it prints out:

timezone: 134513644

but in BASH shell if i type DATE, then this is the output:
Mon Oct 18 09:44:00 NZDT 2004
so it does know about NZ time...

Anyone got ideas?

Thanks all.
G.


> > Date:  Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:26:28 -3736512
> 
> The timezone offset (-3736512) is obtained from the "timezone" variable, which
> is initialized with the tzset() function inside elogd. See "man tzset" for
> details. It looks like if the timezone on your FreeBSD box is not correctly
> defined. 
> 
> Try to compile and execute following C program:
> 
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <time.h>
> 
> main()
> {
>    tzset();
>    printf("timezone: %d\n", timezone);
> }
> 
> This should print something like "timezone: -3600". If not, you might consider
> defining the "TZ" environment variable. Maybe some FreeBSD expert knows some
> details about this.
  67207   Thu Feb 23 16:23:10 2012 Question Nicolas FRANCOISnicolas.francois@free.frQuestionLinux2.5.2-1New user: problem with configuration (password file)

Hi.

 

I'd like to use elog as a tool ta keep my notes, links, passwords... It's installed on my personal computer at home (Debian Squeeze), behind a Ip-Cop firewall, so I guess it won't be accessible from anywhere outside. But I'd like to protect the log with a password anyway. BTW, I had some hard time figuring out how to configure the different files for french (there was a problem with UTF8 mixing up with Latin1... I recoded the language file to UTF8 to solve it).

 

I followed the procedure described here, but I have a problem with second stage :

  • I set Password file = elog.pwd in the elog.conf file (it's not elog.cfg on Debian...)
  • I restart the daemon
  • I try to login to http://localhost:8080/, and receive the message : "error opening the file elog.pwd"

I get this message even after :

  1. adding my user account to the elog group
  2. launching Epiphany as root

So I guess I have to create (how ???) the file elog.pwd, which, if I understand correctly, can be empty at the start... But where do I save it ?

 

Thank you for any help, and sorry if I'm a little confused. I had hard time figuring out where to find everything.

 

\bye

  567   Fri Jul 2 15:18:20 2004 Warning Alexandre Camsonnecamsonne@jlab.orgBug reportLinux2.5.2 - 2.5.3Re: User/Admin privlege question
Hi, 
I also have this problem, when a non admin user logs in he does not have access to
the config file but if he logs out he can then access the config file as non logged
user.
I also tried to upgrade to version 2.5.3 but running under this version does not ask
for passwords so I reverted to 2.5.2.

Besides these few details, your software is great !

Thank you,

Alexandre

> > For some reason if I define a "login user" that is allowed the configure
> > option he is also allowed to change the configuration file. According to the
> > documentation it seems like this should NOT be the case. Any ideas as to
> > what the problem might be? 
> 
> Unfortunately I cannot reproduce your problem. This leaves few possibilites:
> 
> - any login user CAN change his/her full name, email address etc. but only admin
> users can change ALL OTHERS as well. Admin users should see a "change elogd.cfg"
> button on the config page, whil normal users will not
> 
> - are you sure you logged out as admin user and loggin in again as non-admin
> user? Under some circumstances, the browser keeps old cookies which can confuse
> things. Best is if you delete all browser cookies and try again (Tools/Internet
> Options/Delete Cookies in IE).
> 
> - Stefan
  573   Wed Jul 7 17:43:22 2004 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportLinux2.5.2 - 2.5.3Re: User/Admin privlege question
> I also have this problem, when a non admin user logs in he does not have access to
> the config file but if he logs out he can then access the config file as non logged
> user.

If he logs out, how can he access a logbook at all? He should be presented a login
screen, nothing else...

> I also tried to upgrade to version 2.5.3 but running under this version does not ask
> for passwords so I reverted to 2.5.2.

Better first let's fix this problem. Under what circumstances does 2.5.3 not ask for
passwords? Maybe you can get the newest version from CVS (see download page) and try
again, I had problems when using the -DHAVE_CRYPT functionality, but I guess you did not
have that, do you?

So once you tried the latest snapshot, and still have problems, describe them carefully,
send me your configuration file, and I will have a look.

- Stefan
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6