Re: attachment indicator in summary view, posted by Edmundo T Rodriguez on Fri Apr 4 22:53:17 2008
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| Dennis Seitz wrote: |
|
It would be nice to have the option of including an attachment indicator column in summary view to show if an entry has any attachments.
|
Nice idea. I implemented that feature, as can be seen at the contributions logbook for example. It will be contained in the next release.
|
Would it be possible to instead of appearing a "clip" and/or "multiple-clips" (as the number of attachments grow) to appear a number which will be = to the count of attachments to avoid the column become too wide?
Hope it works because this is tool better every day.
Keep up the GOOD Work! |
Re: attachment indicator in summary view, posted by Dennis Seitz on Sat Apr 5 00:43:21 2008
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| Dennis Seitz wrote: |
|
It would be nice to have the option of including an attachment indicator column in summary view to show if an entry has any attachments.
|
Nice idea. I implemented that feature, as can be seen at the contributions logbook for example. It will be contained in the next release.
|
Thanks!
|
|
Re: attachment indicator in summary view, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Apr 7 10:01:27 2008
|
| Edmundo T Rodriguez wrote: |
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| Dennis Seitz wrote: |
|
It would be nice to have the option of including an attachment indicator column in summary view to show if an entry has any attachments.
|
Nice idea. I implemented that feature, as can be seen at the contributions logbook for example. It will be contained in the next release.
|
Would it be possible to instead of appearing a "clip" and/or "multiple-clips" (as the number of attachments grow) to appear a number which will be = to the count of attachments to avoid the column become too wide?
|
Ok, so I show individual clips up to five, and the number of attachments if more than five. |
|
Re: attachment indicator in summary view, posted by Grant Jeffcote on Sat Apr 12 22:04:58 2008
|
Hi Stefan,
When using 2.7.3-2095 I can't seem to get the paperclip/s to show, just an additional field in the summary view (named Attachments) with the attachment file names below? Am I missing something?
Thanks
|
Dennis Seitz wrote
|
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| Dennis Seitz wrote: |
|
It would be nice to have the option of including an attachment indicator column in summary view to show if an entry has any attachments.
|
Nice idea. I implemented that feature, as can be seen at the contributions logbook for example. It will be contained in the next release.
|
Thanks!
|
|
|
Re: attachment indicator in summary view, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sun Apr 13 16:04:09 2008
|
| Grant Jeffcote wrote: |
|
When using 2.7.3-2095 I can't seem to get the paperclip/s to show, just an additional field in the summary view (named Attachments) with the attachment file names below? Am I missing something?
|
Yes, you miss the paperlclip icon. Get it from here and copy it under elog/themes/default/attachment.png. |
scrollable text section only when viewing a log entry, posted by Bill Pier on Wed Apr 23 01:55:16 2008
|
Is there a way, option, feature to setup the text section only to be scrollable when viewing a log entry, such that the header (meta info) section stays fixed?
|
|
Re: scrollable text section only when viewing a log entry, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Apr 23 07:46:56 2008
|
| Bill Pier wrote: |
|
Is there a way, option, feature to setup the text section only to be scrollable when viewing a log entry, such that the header (meta info) section stays fixed?
|
Unfortunately no. |
LaTeX support, posted by Jochen Krempel on Wed Apr 23 18:59:30 2008
|
I would appreciate if elog could provide a simple support for mathematical expressions.
A solution similar to wikimedia should be easy to implement and would help a lot.
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Running_MediaWiki_on_Windows#Alternative_Solution
The idea is to parse the elog entry for a tag (e.g. <math></math>), extract the code, wrap it into a latex file, and pass this to latex, GhostScript, and ImageMagic. (The latter are already used by Elog, therefore the changes should not be too big.) The resulting image file would then be referenced by the elog html code.
Of course, the FCKeditor would not support LaTeX. However, the majority of elog-useres should be scientists and rather familiar with LaTeX. Therefore it should be fine if the original LaTeX code is saved (e.g. in the ALT-tag of the image) and the replacement "code to image" is undone for editing.
Kind regards,
Jochen |