ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
67556
|
Tue Sep 3 08:34:27 2013 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Question | Linux | 2.5.2 | Re: Paragraph width size of log entries? | > Hello,
>
> I've had much success and use with ELOG. However there is one thing that I wish I could figure out in order to
> make ELOG work exactly as I need it.
>
> When I either create a new ELOG entry, or, have one created via an automated scrip run by CRON, the paragraph
> width is preset.
>
> I've read the notes and experimented with setting the text size, but it seems that if I either adjust it via the
> config file, or, change the size by dragging the message box itself, then I end up with an ELOG entry that has an
> irregular message size to it than all the others. Consistency and uniformity is very important to me for how I
> use ELOG.
>
> It would be idea, if the log entries did not contain <CR>'s or justified lines. In other words, I would like to
> be able to have my ELOG entry fill the width of the screen, be it a wide screen or standard portrait scree, and
> at whatever resolution and text size I have my browser set to.
>
> By not filling the entire width (and also by not having it auto adjust depending on screen size, resolution,
> etc.) there are large portions of the screen real estate that is lost and you end up with very long, scrolling
> log entries versus entries that file the entire width and therefor take less vertical screen space.
>
> With all that said -- Does anyone else have this issue? And, is there anything I can do to correct this? This
> would make me a very happy user if it could be done.
>
> Thank you in advance!
Hi Ryan,
Do you quote the previous entries in later entries, with the '>' character (as above)? I ask this because that will
make what you are requesting much more complicated, soon making those previous entries very difficult to read
indeed.
For me, readabiliy of previous quoted entries is important - along with the indenting '>' character to denote each
entry - your request would be an issue for me simply because of how many times an entry may get re-quoted in later
replies - over 40 is not uncommon. As such, I tend to keep my lines short when writing an entry, being aware
that it could soon have a large number of '>' characters preceeding it.
[Sep 03 07:30]
Not an aside as such, but I have tried to experiment with this quoting business, to remove the '>' character (easy
enough) but have each quoted reply headed with a simple date/timestamp *within* this text box, such as I headed this
paragraph. It hasn't worked as I expected, and I'm not sure why - maybe it might even be a bug! But if that
could be cracked, then your suggestion would be a boon to me as well.
|
68196
|
Fri Nov 20 11:20:49 2015 |
| Paolo Franchini | p.franchini@warwick.ac.uk | Question | Windows | 2.5.2 | Re: can attrinute fields contain more that one line | > > > Was just wondering about the status of the multi-line attributes in Elog, are
> > > they implemented in elog yet? If not is that something you are planning to do
> > > in the future?
> >
> > In order to have multi-line attributes, the whole format of the logbooks has to be
> > changed. I plan to use XML for the logbook format in the future. We would not have
> > any more one file per day, but one big file per logbook. I have already some XML
> > functionality in elog, but this one requires a major rewrite of the whole code. On
> > the other hand, searching etc. will become much faster afterwards. I plan to start
> > this development soon, but it might take quite some time, so don't expect it
> > before summer or fall.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Stefan
>
> Thanks for your help, thats useful to know.
>
> Paul
Hi Stefan,
any update on the multi-line request?
cheers,
Paolo |
68198
|
Fri Nov 20 12:41:58 2015 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.5.2 | Re: can attrinute fields contain more that one line | > > > > Was just wondering about the status of the multi-line attributes in Elog, are
> > > > they implemented in elog yet? If not is that something you are planning to do
> > > > in the future?
> > >
> > > In order to have multi-line attributes, the whole format of the logbooks has to be
> > > changed. I plan to use XML for the logbook format in the future. We would not have
> > > any more one file per day, but one big file per logbook. I have already some XML
> > > functionality in elog, but this one requires a major rewrite of the whole code. On
> > > the other hand, searching etc. will become much faster afterwards. I plan to start
> > > this development soon, but it might take quite some time, so don't expect it
> > > before summer or fall.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Stefan
> >
> > Thanks for your help, thats useful to know.
> >
> > Paul
>
> Hi Stefan,
>
> any update on the multi-line request?
Nope. Too many other things to do during my "day job".
Stefan |
68199
|
Fri Nov 20 15:27:12 2015 |
| Paolo Franchini | p.franchini@warwick.ac.uk | Question | Windows | 2.5.2 | Re: can attrinute fields contain more that one line | > > > > > Was just wondering about the status of the multi-line attributes in Elog, are
> > > > > they implemented in elog yet? If not is that something you are planning to do
> > > > > in the future?
> > > >
> > > > In order to have multi-line attributes, the whole format of the logbooks has to be
> > > > changed. I plan to use XML for the logbook format in the future. We would not have
> > > > any more one file per day, but one big file per logbook. I have already some XML
> > > > functionality in elog, but this one requires a major rewrite of the whole code. On
> > > > the other hand, searching etc. will become much faster afterwards. I plan to start
> > > > this development soon, but it might take quite some time, so don't expect it
> > > > before summer or fall.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > > Stefan
> > >
> > > Thanks for your help, thats useful to know.
> > >
> > > Paul
> >
> > Hi Stefan,
> >
> > any update on the multi-line request?
>
> Nope. Too many other things to do during my "day job".
>
> Stefan
Thank you, your eLog is already a very good instrument! |
507
|
Wed Mar 24 17:48:28 2004 |
| Charles Duncan | Charles@YorkU.CA | Question | Linux | 2.5.1-1 Debian Linux | Elog Utility | I am trying to use the Elog Utility to import a few thousand entries. So
far I have run into a few problems.
a) Cannot get elog utility to speak to elogd on port 8080. Even though I
use the -p 8080 option with elog. I was able to get it to work when I
moved my server to port 80.
b) I cannot get elog to work with and attributes or logbooks that contain
spaces. Please refer the the following example:
elog -v -h scotland.ccs.yorku.ca -p 80 -a "Station Number"="CC001" -a "Mac
Address"="000874fdc895" -a "Hostname"="cc001.cnscommons.yorku.ca" -a "IP
Address"="10.6.10.52" -a "Manufacturer"="Dell" -a "Model Line"="Optiplex" -
a "Model Number"="GX270" -a "Monitor Manufacturer"="Dell" -a "Monitor
Model"="E151FP" -a "Memory"="512MB" -a "CPU Speed"="2.6GHz" -a "Hard
Drive"="40GB" -a "Service Count"="-" -l WSC2 -u charles xxxxx "DD/MM/YY:
Change Description"
This line executes fine. Except only Hostname, Manufacturer, Memory and
text are populated in the record. All the rest of the fields are blank.
c) the only way I was able to get the transaction to work was by reducing
the size of the log book to a single word (ie WSC2).
Do I have to reduce all my attributes to single words? Or am I missing
something simple to use as a delimiter for entry??
Thanks in advance
-Charles- |
510
|
Thu Mar 25 18:20:15 2004 |
| Charles Duncan | Charles@YorkU.CA | Question | Linux | 2.5.1-1 Debian Linux | Re: Elog Utility | > I am trying to use the Elog Utility to import a few thousand entries. So
> far I have run into a few problems.
>
> a) Cannot get elog utility to speak to elogd on port 8080. Even though I
> use the -p 8080 option with elog. I was able to get it to work when I
> moved my server to port 80.
>
> b) I cannot get elog to work with and attributes or logbooks that contain
> spaces. Please refer the the following example:
>
> elog -v -h scotland.ccs.yorku.ca -p 80 -a "Station Number"="CC001" -a "Mac
> Address"="000874fdc895" -a "Hostname"="cc001.cnscommons.yorku.ca" -a "IP
> Address"="10.6.10.52" -a "Manufacturer"="Dell" -a "Model Line"="Optiplex" -
> a "Model Number"="GX270" -a "Monitor Manufacturer"="Dell" -a "Monitor
> Model"="E151FP" -a "Memory"="512MB" -a "CPU Speed"="2.6GHz" -a "Hard
> Drive"="40GB" -a "Service Count"="-" -l WSC2 -u charles xxxxx "DD/MM/YY:
> Change Description"
>
> This line executes fine. Except only Hostname, Manufacturer, Memory and
> text are populated in the record. All the rest of the fields are blank.
>
> c) the only way I was able to get the transaction to work was by reducing
> the size of the log book to a single word (ie WSC2).
>
> Do I have to reduce all my attributes to single words? Or am I missing
> something simple to use as a delimiter for entry??
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> -Charles-
As a followup, this occurs not only in the Linux environment, but also under
Windows XP. I get the same results...
-Charles- |
511
|
Fri Mar 26 09:37:08 2004 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.5.1-1 Debian Linux | Re: Elog Utility | > a) Cannot get elog utility to speak to elogd on port 8080. Even though I
> use the -p 8080 option with elog. I was able to get it to work when I
> moved my server to port 80.
That problem has been fixed in revision 1.16 from Feb. 19th. Please get the
newest version from release 2.5.2 issued today.
> b) I cannot get elog to work with and attributes or logbooks that contain
> spaces. Please refer the the following example:
>
> elog -v -h scotland.ccs.yorku.ca -p 80 -a "Station Number"="CC001" -a "Mac
> Address"="000874fdc895" -a "Hostname"="cc001.cnscommons.yorku.ca" -a "IP
> Address"="10.6.10.52" -a "Manufacturer"="Dell" -a "Model Line"="Optiplex" -
> a "Model Number"="GX270" -a "Monitor Manufacturer"="Dell" -a "Monitor
> Model"="E151FP" -a "Memory"="512MB" -a "CPU Speed"="2.6GHz" -a "Hard
> Drive"="40GB" -a "Service Count"="-" -l WSC2 -u charles xxxxx "DD/MM/YY:
> Change Description"
There was also some bug which has been fixed, plus you need following syntax:
elog -h ... -p 8080 -a "Station Number=CC001" ...
note the "" are around the whole attribute=value string, not only the attribute. |
513
|
Sat Mar 27 18:52:16 2004 |
| Charles Duncan | Charles@YorkU.CA | Question | Linux | 2.5.1-1 Debian Linux | Re: Elog Utility | > > a) Cannot get elog utility to speak to elogd on port 8080. Even though I
> > use the -p 8080 option with elog. I was able to get it to work when I
> > moved my server to port 80.
>
> That problem has been fixed in revision 1.16 from Feb. 19th. Please get the
> newest version from release 2.5.2 issued today.
>
> > b) I cannot get elog to work with and attributes or logbooks that contain
> > spaces. Please refer the the following example:
> >
> > elog -v -h scotland.ccs.yorku.ca -p 80 -a "Station Number"="CC001" -a "Mac
> > Address"="000874fdc895" -a "Hostname"="cc001.cnscommons.yorku.ca" -a "IP
> > Address"="10.6.10.52" -a "Manufacturer"="Dell" -a "Model Line"="Optiplex" -
> > a "Model Number"="GX270" -a "Monitor Manufacturer"="Dell" -a "Monitor
> > Model"="E151FP" -a "Memory"="512MB" -a "CPU Speed"="2.6GHz" -a "Hard
> > Drive"="40GB" -a "Service Count"="-" -l WSC2 -u charles xxxxx "DD/MM/YY:
> > Change Description"
>
> There was also some bug which has been fixed, plus you need following syntax:
>
> elog -h ... -p 8080 -a "Station Number=CC001" ...
>
> note the "" are around the whole attribute=value string, not only the attribute.
Steve,
Thank you for the updates!!!
everything works great... -p 8080 and all my attribs get set.
The only part that does not work is -l "Log Book" the -l variable has to stay as
one word. If I submit 2 words (in quotes) it only looks for a logbook of the first
word and fails.
-Charles- |
|