ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
67161
|
Thu Jan 12 19:34:28 2012 |
| Allen | bastss@rit.edu | Bug report | Windows | 2.9.0-2396 | Re: Elog does not work after installing MS12-006/MS12-012 on Win 7 |
A little more information here
We are running elog on an Ubuntu server
Elog was working fine, then, on a windows 7 machine, MS12-006 was installed, rebooted, and could no longer connect to the elog web page.
Discovered that in Internet Explorer 8, by unchecking the use TLS 1.0 in options advanced tab, and making sure that SSL 3.0, TLS 1.1, TLS 1.2 were checked, that the page once again worked. I'm guessing the elog does not support SSL 3.0, otherwise, I assume I would have to uncheck that as well. Things do appear to still work on XP, thus far, only Windows 7 appears to break. While we have a work around, ideally we would like to see a bug fix so that (for legacy reasons), elog will still work with TLS 1.0 on Windows 7.
|
67162
|
Thu Jan 12 19:37:52 2012 |
| Allen | bastss@rit.edu | Bug report | Windows | 2.9.0-2396 | Re: Elog does not work after installing MS12-006/MS12-012 on Win 7 |
Allen wrote: |
A little more information here
We are running elog on an Ubuntu server
Elog was working fine, then, on a windows 7 machine, MS12-006 was installed, rebooted, and could no longer connect to the elog web page.
Discovered that in Internet Explorer 8, by unchecking the use TLS 1.0 in options advanced tab, and making sure that SSL 3.0, TLS 1.1, TLS 1.2 were checked, that the page once again worked. I'm guessing the elog does not support SSL 3.0, otherwise, I assume I would have to uncheck that as well. Things do appear to still work on XP, thus far, only Windows 7 appears to break. While we have a work around, ideally we would like to see a bug fix so that (for legacy reasons), elog will still work with TLS 1.0 on Windows 7.
|
Also, strangely, I am able to use the elog forum page https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum while TLS 1.0 is checked. I notice the version number is 2.9.0-2425, while we are using 2.9.0-2396, so wondering if this is fixed in this newer version. |
67163
|
Fri Jan 13 14:33:04 2012 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Windows | 2.9.0-2396 | Re: Elog does not work after installing MS12-006/MS12-012 on Win 7 |
Allen wrote: |
Allen wrote: |
A little more information here
We are running elog on an Ubuntu server
Elog was working fine, then, on a windows 7 machine, MS12-006 was installed, rebooted, and could no longer connect to the elog web page.
Discovered that in Internet Explorer 8, by unchecking the use TLS 1.0 in options advanced tab, and making sure that SSL 3.0, TLS 1.1, TLS 1.2 were checked, that the page once again worked. I'm guessing the elog does not support SSL 3.0, otherwise, I assume I would have to uncheck that as well. Things do appear to still work on XP, thus far, only Windows 7 appears to break. While we have a work around, ideally we would like to see a bug fix so that (for legacy reasons), elog will still work with TLS 1.0 on Windows 7.
|
Also, strangely, I am able to use the elog forum page https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum while TLS 1.0 is checked. I notice the version number is 2.9.0-2425, while we are using 2.9.0-2396, so wondering if this is fixed in this newer version.
|
The forum does not use TLS, but has Apache in front of it which works as a proxy. So TLS is actually handled by Apache, which might have a newer implementation of TLS. The ELOG version number certainly does not make a difference, I did not touch the SSL functionality in a while. But when you compile ELOG on your Ubunto server, you can maybe play with different versions of OpenSSL and see if that changes anything?
- Stefan |
67164
|
Wed Jan 25 10:07:16 2012 |
| Christian Herzog | herzog@phys.ethz.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2.9.0 | problems with https in Chrome and IE | Hi,
we're evaluating elog right now at the Physics Department of ETH Zurich and I'm trying to come up with a good config. One of the first steps of course was to enable SSL/https. With http, all tested browsers work fine, but with https at least Google Chrome 16 and IE 9 do not get past the "unknown certificate" warning and I see "TCP connection broken" errors in the log file. Firefox however works fine. Same behavior on Linux, Mac and Windows (given the browser in question is available). elog server is running on Lucid.
Any idea?
thanks,
-Christian |
67182
|
Fri Feb 10 11:54:35 2012 |
| Olaf Kasten | olaf.kasten@deutschebahn.com | Bug report | Linux | Windows | 2.9.0 | ssl problems | Hi there,
I have a connection problem with an actual elog installation. Many Browsers like as Chrome, Firefox and IE don't connect to the elog server with ssl = 1 in elogd.cfg.
I tested with Firefox 3.6 and IE 7 installations and there are no problems.
I guess it's a bug. Does someone have a suggestion to solve that problem?
Thx. Olaf |
67183
|
Fri Feb 10 17:18:25 2012 |
| John Doroshenko | doroshenko@physics.rutgers.edu | Bug report | Linux | Windows | 2.9.0 | Re: ssl problems |
Olaf Kasten wrote: |
Hi there,
I have a connection problem with an actual elog installation. Many Browsers like as Chrome, Firefox and IE don't connect to the elog server with ssl = 1 in elogd.cfg.
I tested with Firefox 3.6 and IE 7 installations and there are no problems.
I guess it's a bug. Does someone have a suggestion to solve that problem?
Thx. Olaf
|
Hi!
This just started happening here also. Some users can't get on to a SSL=1 config'd elog using either IE or firefox 10 (win7 or linux) or chrome. SAFARI works. Occurs in 2.8.0 and a newly built (even after
ssl yum updates) 2.9.0 version on SL5.5 system. Seems to accept self signed cert then nothing.. (connection reset message). Tried an stunnel from one port to port running elog
with SSL=0. Same behavior. Doesn't work on some browsers. Any clues?
Thanks,
-John |
67208
|
Mon Mar 5 16:19:24 2012 |
| Paraic Fahey | paraic.fahey@pfizer.com | Bug report | Windows | 2.7.6 | Record Proliferation | Saving, using Submit sees recently updated fields cleared after hitting SUBMIT.
MOre significantly this then leads to a proliferation of instances of the same record being generated in the logfile and consequently on the logbook.
Has anybody a fix or advice on this? |
67209
|
Thu Mar 8 10:01:47 2012 |
| Olivier Callot | olivier.callot@cern.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2.9.0-2418 | Truncation of the displayed text in Summary view of the list of entries | In the summary view, it seems that the text is truncated at the first "<" character. See https://lblogbook.cern.ch/Shift/48812 for a simple entry, then use the 'list' command to see that only a very small part is displayed. |
|