| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
67997
|
Wed Jun 10 11:52:47 2015 |
 | Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | All | 3.1 | Re: Formatting multiple datetime entries |
| Edmund Hertle wrote: | Hey
in one of my measurement logbooks I'm using two datetime entries (for start and end time of a measurement). The entries are created automatically by the measurement script.
Attributes = Time Start, Time End
Type Time Start = datetime
Type Time End = datetime
Time format = %H:%M:%S
For better visual appearance I would like to only display the time on the two additional datetime fields but keep the full date and time on the standard date field. Using the "Time format" option will influence all three at once.
Is there an option to do something like the time format for individual attributes (similar to the syntax of adding comments etc)?
Example:Attributes = Time Start, Time End
Type Time Start = datetime
Type Time End = datetime
Time format Time Start = %H:%M:%S
Time format Time End = %H:%M:%S
|
Ok, implemented in the current version. |
|
67999
|
Wed Jun 10 12:48:41 2015 |
| Neal Grafton | neal.grafton@stfc.ac.uk | Question | All | 3.1 | Re: Formatting multiple datetime entries |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Edmund Hertle wrote: | Hey
in one of my measurement logbooks I'm using two datetime entries (for start and end time of a measurement). The entries are created automatically by the measurement script.
Attributes = Time Start, Time End
Type Time Start = datetime
Type Time End = datetime
Time format = %H:%M:%S
For better visual appearance I would like to only display the time on the two additional datetime fields but keep the full date and time on the standard date field. Using the "Time format" option will influence all three at once.
Is there an option to do something like the time format for individual attributes (similar to the syntax of adding comments etc)?
Example:Attributes = Time Start, Time End
Type Time Start = datetime
Type Time End = datetime
Time format Time Start = %H:%M:%S
Time format Time End = %H:%M:%S
|
Ok, implemented in the current version. |
I can use that....
Also, is there a way of automatically displaying the difference in Hrs mins between Time start and Time End? |
|
68000
|
Wed Jun 10 12:52:48 2015 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | All | 3.1 | Re: Formatting multiple datetime entries |
| Neal Grafton wrote: |
Also, is there a way of automatically displaying the difference in Hrs mins between Time start and Time End? |
Nope. The only way to do that is to use a scrip on the server (see elog:67876 for example), or use JavaScript. With "Top Text = <file>" you can "sneak in" some JavaScript code which massages the DOM tree and computes everything you want.
/Stefan |
|
68001
|
Wed Jun 10 12:56:58 2015 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | All | 3.1 | Re: Formatting multiple datetime entries |
| Neal Grafton wrote: | | Also, is there a way of automatically displaying the difference in Hrs mins between Time start and Time End? |
I guess you want to do some more complex calculations, like adding the running times, etc. This goes beyond the scope of elog. You can however export elog entries as a CSV file and import it in a spreadsheet program and do there all calculations you want.
/Stefan |
|
68002
|
Wed Jun 10 13:00:07 2015 |
| Neal Grafton | neal.grafton@stfc.ac.uk | Question | All | 3.1 | Re: Formatting multiple datetime entries |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Neal Grafton wrote: | | Also, is there a way of automatically displaying the difference in Hrs mins between Time start and Time End? |
I guess you want to do some more complex calculations, like adding the running times, etc. This goes beyond the scope of elog. You can however export elog entries as a CSV file and import it in a spreadsheet program and do there all calculations you want.
/Stefan |
Thanks Stefan
Neal |
|
68070
|
Tue Aug 4 15:35:39 2015 |
 | Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Info | All | 3.1.1 | Version 3.1.1 of elog has been released |
Version 3.1.1, released August 4th, 2015
-
Updated CKEditor to version 4.5.1
-
Implemented "Date/Time format <attribute> = ..."
-
Implemented "Use Email Subject Edit = ..."
-
Replaced "Back" by "Delete" button
-
Fixed many issues with Draft Messages
-
CSS file is now in *addition* to the default file elog.css
-
Added LDAP documentation
-
Added "Logout to URL = ..." option
-
Added description of Apacher server authentication
|
|
68080
|
Wed Aug 12 23:44:16 2015 |
 | Eric Quintero | ericq@caltech.edu | Question | All | 3.0.0-70b274b | Show attachments = 0 |
I have "Show attachments = 0" set in [global], but attachments are shown in the "Full" view. Is this the intended behavior? Looking at individual entries correctly hides the attachments.
We use inline images often, so when an attachement is shown at the bottom of a post it is effectively a duplicate, which clutters things up a bit. |
|
68081
|
Thu Aug 13 08:41:57 2015 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | All | 3.0.0-70b274b | Re: Show attachments = 0 |
That's strange. If you use HTML or ELCode encoding, attachments are automatically hidden if they are used inline. So no "Show attachments = 0" necessary! I just tried that with the demo logbook and here is how it looks:
As you can see, there is no attachment shown in the full view. This is actually handled by the function "is_inline_attachment()" in elogd.c. I don't know if you can do debugging, but somehow this inline test won't work for you and the question is why. Can you try the simple configuration from the demo logbook and see if you still have the problem? Can you show me an example when this does not work. I need to reproduce your problem exactly in order to fix it.
Stefan
| Eric Quintero wrote: |
|
I have "Show attachments = 0" set in [global], but attachments are shown in the "Full" view. Is this the intended behavior? Looking at individual entries correctly hides the attachments.
We use inline images often, so when an attachement is shown at the bottom of a post it is effectively a duplicate, which clutters things up a bit.
|
|