Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 718 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icondown Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  1551   Thu Dec 15 13:08:35 2005 Idea Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chInfoAll2.6.0New ELOG version 2.6.0
Dear ELOG users,

I'm happy to announce the release of ELOG version 2.6.0. After a long period of beta testing, all functions are now sufficiently stable for a public release. The major new feature is the introduction of the ELCode tags. They are similar to the well known BBCode tags, and let you format an elog entry. It is now also possible to embed inline images in an elog entry , which are even sent in email notifications.

So have fun,

Stefan
  1555   Tue Dec 20 09:18:19 2005 Idea Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chInfo SVN 1579Shell substitution, especially interesting for running online experiments
Shell substitution has been introduced in an experimental state of the current SVN version of ELOG. It woks such that the subsititution list can contain $shell(<argument>) commands. The <argument> is passed to the shell of the operating system and the result is captured and subsituted. This is handy for online experiments, where one wants to pass information automatically to elog. Assume that there is a file /tmp/runnumber containing the current run number of the experiment. All one needs to put the current run number in an attribute "Run number" is the following line in the configuration file:

Preset Run number = $shell(cat /tmp/runnumber)

This subsitution works also for the main text body. Following option will put a calendar of the current month into the text body:

Preset text = $shell(cal)

note that shell subsitution works both on Windows and Unix, the "cat" and "cal" commands are however only present under Unix, but "cat" can be replaced with its Windows counterpart "type".
  1556   Tue Dec 20 11:17:17 2005 Idea Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chInfo 2.6.0Howto insert screen dumps into an elog entry
With the new ELCode tags, one can insert screen dumps pretty easy into elog entries. I personally use HoverSnap 0.8 under Windows, there are similar tools under Linux. HoverSnap puts a "Capture.jpg" file in a selectable directoy when you press PrintScreen, then you can instert this file with the button. Here is such a screendump example:

  1624   Tue Jan 24 14:43:19 2006 Idea T. Ribbrockemgaron@gmx.netRequestLinux2.6.1Suggestion additional ElCodes
I have to say, now that I'm finally on 2.6.x, I grew really fond of the ElCode stuff - great addition! It saves a lot of straight HTML typing for me... THANKS!

However, there are two things I'm missing:
  • Headings
    It would be great to have a range of

    ,

    , ... tags that map directly to their HTML counterparts (and have buttons, of course... Big grin ). That makes structuring an entry much easier in my opinion (and the output is easier to deal with for tools like html2ps) and I'm really missing those.
  • Tables
    This one is probably more difficult to add, but support for simple tables would be enough. But this is more a "nice to have"...
  1738   Wed Mar 1 12:27:36 2006 Idea Holger Mundhahsholger.mundhahs@vtg-rail.comQuestionWindows2.6.1-1653[SOLVED] Re: list view mode remembert - Bug?
> > As default http://<hostname>/<LOGBOOK> shows the Summary View.
> > Clicking in "Full" changes the URL to http://<hostname>/<LOGBOOK>/?mode=full.
> > But now the URL http://<hostname>/<LOGBOOK> show the Full view as default.
> > I think the URL without ?mode=... should show every time the same result,
> > regardless the view used before. Or maybe I can configure, which view I want to
> > see if I use the URL w/o ?mode=... The option to hide/show attachments is affected too.
> 
> Sure, that's a feature :D
> 
> It was requested by several people that the view mode is stored in a cookie. So if you switch modes, it should be
> persistent. If I now add additional default flags, people will have hard time to understand what this is all
> about, since there might then be conflicting settings between the flags and the cookies. So for what exact purpose
> do you want what you requested? Why does it bother you that you have to click "Summary" again to get the summary
> view? Of course you can delete the local cookies and get the default behaviour (they are named [b]elmode[/b] and
> [b]elattach[/b]), but that might be a bit cumbersome. 

Thank you for your explanation. My situation was, that I've played around with "Mode commands = 0". In normal case I 
use the Summary view, but on one logbook I've changed it to Full before, and after setting the parameter I can't 
revert it to Summary. But now I know how it works and can use it like intended.

Regards
Holger 
  1746   Sat Mar 4 05:17:14 2006 Idea Glenn Horton-Smithgahs@phys.ksu.eduRequestAll2.6.1-1668require smileys to have whitespace on either side?
It would be nice if elog would only interpret something as a smiley if it is surrounded by whitespace. It can be particularly annoying that an 8 followed by a right paren becomes a "cool" smiley -- e.g., a parenthetical reference to event eighteen (18) becomes mangled... [That was "18" inside the parens.]

Is there already a way to solve this issue (other than always previewing your entries and adding spaces before parans)? Is the feature hard to implement?
  1760   Mon Mar 6 20:51:57 2006 Idea Glenn Horton-Smithgahs@phys.ksu.eduRequestAll2.6.1-1668Provide option to require smileys to be bracketed a la ELCode?

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Glenn Horton-Smith wrote:
It would be nice if elog would only interpret something as a smiley if it is surrounded by whitespace. It can be particularly annoying that an 8 followed by a right paren becomes a "cool" smiley -- e.g., a parenthetical reference to event eighteen (18) becomes mangled... [That was "18" inside the parens.] ...


Interpreting smileys only if they are surrounded by whitespace does not solve the problem completely. It will solve it for (1\8), but not if you have (1, \8) (1, 9) in your text. So it's not a good solution. If you have problems with simleys, I would post my text in plain mode, or surround your numbers with [code]...[/code] tags...


Hmm, you're right. But I like EL Code, and I don't want to give it up just because of the smileys! A better solution would be to provide an option, which when set, would require smileys to be in brackets, e.g., [\8)] would become the cool smiley [8)], rendered without surrounding brackets if the option was set.

I actually just spent some time I didn't really have and modified my copy of elogd to see if it could be done and would work as intended. Eureka, it works! The modification implements an option "use bracketed smileys" which, if set to 1, causes the editor smiley bar to insert smileys with the square brackets around them and causes rsputs_elcode() to only substitute for smileys if there are square brackets around them, suppressing the square brackets.

I like this feature. Maybe others would like it too. I have a patch file (diff -cbw) w.r.t. svn version 1663 if you're interested.
  1814   Wed May 3 00:16:42 2006 Idea Mark Bergmanmark.bergman@uphs.upenn.eduRequestLinux2.6.1allow per-logfile attributes to be added/subtracted from the global settings
I think it would be a big enhancement to allow per-logbook attributes to be additions or subtractions from the global attributes, rather than replacing the global settings.

For example, the [global] section of my elogd.cfg reads:

Attributes = Author, Type, Category, Severity, Subject, Entry ID, Status
Extendable Attributes = Type, Category, Severity, Subject, Status
Options Category = Hardware, Software (OS and utilities), Software (Application), Network, Security, Other
Options Severity = None, Low, Medium, High, Critical
Options Status = Open, Closed, In-Progress, Suspended
Options Type = To-Do, Problem Report, Problem Fixed, Informational Note, Software Installation, Configuration, Other
Required Attributes = Type, Category, Subject, Status

I've also got an logbook for each server for hardware issues. Within those logbooks, I'd like to keep all the fields except the software fields, and add fields for memory and storage.

Adding 7 definitions to each server logbook makes the config file huge and difficult to edit, and it means that a future change to the global settings wouldn't propagate to the individual log files. I'd really like to do something like:

[server47]
-Options Category = Software (OS and utilities), Software (Application)
+Options Category = Storage, Memory
-Options Type = Software Installation
+Options Type = RAM Installation, Drive upgrade

As I see it, the initial "-" sign in front of an attribute or option would indicate that the fields listed should be deleted from the global set (if the field name is an exact match), and a leading "+" indicates that the given fields would be added to the global attribute of the same name, for that specific logbook.

The current behavior--without a leading "+" or "-" would be unchanged, so that existing config files don't change.

Thanks,

Mark
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6