| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
69163
|
Tue Jun 30 13:42:13 2020 |
 | Lahreche Abdelmadjid | abdelmadjid.lahreche@yahoo.com | Question | Windows | 2006 | Update | Hi,
How to do the last update with out losing any data ?
Regards |
|
69164
|
Tue Jun 30 17:12:10 2020 |
 | Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2006 | Re: change Cell Style | You should edit the CSS style file: /usr/local/elog/themes/default/elog.css
Just change all fields "background-color:" to your desired color; e.g. "#FFFFFF" for white.
| Lahreche Abdelmadjid wrote: |
|
Hi All,
I hope to change the Cell Style backround color into background point.
because my color printer don't work.
can some one give me the code to do that.
Regards.
|
|
|
69165
|
Tue Jun 30 17:15:18 2020 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2006 | Re: Update | When you update from a version 2.* to a version 3.* then all elog entry files will be moved in subfolder for each year. But non of the entries are lost.
Only if you afterwards try to start an old version 2.* with the newly converted data directories, then the old version will not find any of the entries.
I've updated the ELOG version many times now. The only data I once lost was a modified CSS style file and a "hand modified" configuration of the ckeditor.
| Lahreche Abdelmadjid wrote: |
|
Hi,
How to do the last update with out losing any data ?
Regards
|
|
|
69166
|
Wed Jul 1 09:08:17 2020 |
| Lahreche Abdelmadjid | abdelmadjid.lahreche@yahoo.com | Question | Windows | 2006 | Re: change Cell Style | I would like to change the backround cilor of a cell and not sheet.
also don't use color, but system of point (to print it in monochome printer)
| Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
|
You should edit the CSS style file: /usr/local/elog/themes/default/elog.css
Just change all fields "background-color:" to your desired color; e.g. "#FFFFFF" for white.
| Lahreche Abdelmadjid wrote: |
|
Hi All,
I hope to change the Cell Style backround color into background point.
because my color printer don't work.
can some one give me the code to do that.
Regards.
|
|
|
|
69167
|
Mon Jul 6 19:09:48 2020 |
 | Janusz Szuba | janusz.szuba@xfel.eu | Bug report | Linux | 3.1.4 | bug in elog.spec | Hi,
in commit 1812e7c, specifying CFLAGS to make command in elog.spec, renders all other settings in Makefile void. That is, if I want to include any of KRB5, LDAP, PAM support, and change makefile accordingly, then when producing rpm they are not taken into account. Anyway, CFLAGS in Makefile are already set to the same defaults, so why it is redefined in spec file?
best
Janusz |
|
69168
|
Mon Jul 6 20:19:21 2020 |
| Laurent Jean-Rigaud | lollspam@free.fr | Bug report | Linux | 3.1.4 | Re: bug in elog.spec | Hi,
You rights, CFLAGS should not be in specfile to take care of distrib env.
Btw, I sent in the past an update for build process of Stefan delivery to generate src.rpm file copatible to tarball version. I think Stefan did not have time yet to test and to check.
With the enclosed SPEC file, you can build ELOG with options at rpmbulld command w/o modifying sources. For exemple,
rpm -i elog-.....src.rpm
rpmbuild -bb --with ssl --with pam --with ldap --with krb5 ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/elog.spec
I enclosed also the SRPMS i used for my projects. Be careful, It's maybe not uptodate of last GIT version or PSI releases... but you can test it on your RPM distrib. It should be nice to hare your feedback.
Bye,
Laurent
| Janusz Szuba wrote: |
|
Hi,
in commit 1812e7c, specifying CFLAGS to make command in elog.spec, renders all other settings in Makefile void. That is, if I want to include any of KRB5, LDAP, PAM support, and change makefile accordingly, then when producing rpm they are not taken into account. Anyway, CFLAGS in Makefile are already set to the same defaults, so why it is redefined in spec file?
best
Janusz
|
|
|
69169
|
Tue Jul 7 11:22:45 2020 |
| Janusz Szuba | janusz.szuba@xfel.eu | Bug report | Linux | 3.1.4 | Re: bug in elog.spec | Thanks for the answer, I will try with your specfile
best
Janusz
| Laurent Jean-Rigaud wrote: |
|
Hi,
You rights, CFLAGS should not be in specfile to take care of distrib env.
Btw, I sent in the past an update for build process of Stefan delivery to generate src.rpm file copatible to tarball version. I think Stefan did not have time yet to test and to check.
With the enclosed SPEC file, you can build ELOG with options at rpmbulld command w/o modifying sources. For exemple,
rpm -i elog-.....src.rpm
rpmbuild -bb --with ssl --with pam --with ldap --with krb5 ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/elog.spec
I enclosed also the SRPMS i used for my projects. Be careful, It's maybe not uptodate of last GIT version or PSI releases... but you can test it on your RPM distrib. It should be nice to hare your feedback.
Bye,
Laurent
| Janusz Szuba wrote: |
|
Hi,
in commit 1812e7c, specifying CFLAGS to make command in elog.spec, renders all other settings in Makefile void. That is, if I want to include any of KRB5, LDAP, PAM support, and change makefile accordingly, then when producing rpm they are not taken into account. Anyway, CFLAGS in Makefile are already set to the same defaults, so why it is redefined in spec file?
best
Janusz
|
|
|
|
69170
|
Thu Jul 16 23:26:43 2020 |
| Illam Pakkirisamy | illam@senseeker.com | Question | Windows | ELOG V3.1.4-a04 | Expanding column width when viewing in Summary mode | Hi,
I'm trying to expand the Subject column, when viewing in summary mode, and couldn't find any documentation for it. Is this possible and if so, how would I do it.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Illam |
|