Help me please I can't uplode Attach file, posted by Samrit on Thu Apr 17 05:28:56 2008
|
Dear All
I can't uplode Attach file. It have Error
Error: Filename "D:\aaa.doc" contains invalid character |
Please use your browser's back button to go back |
Thank you very much
Joe.. |
Hardcoded Path in Makefile, posted by Martin Killenberg on Tue Feb 20 18:41:31 2007
|
I tried to compile ELOG on Scientific Linux Cern 4.4 and found that make quits because uname is not located in /usr/bin (like it is hardcoded in the makefile) but in /bin.
Later I found that this is only the case in the svn version, in the "latest.tar.gz" from 2007/02/20 the path is /bin.
Why do you have the absolute path in the Makefile? uname should be in the default path on any system. (The same applies to "rm")
I also was confused that you only provide one rpm Package (except for debian) without mentioning for which distribution. You try to avoid dependencies, but the elogd is linked against the basic libraries libc and ld-linux, which might vary. |
HW Requirements to run elog / Performance issues running on ARM, posted by Tim Thiel on Wed May 9 21:48:42 2012
|
Our group is interested in installing elog on a small/low-cost processing platform so that we can provide ready-to-run systems for our collaborators to use. We selected a candidate platform form Technologic Systems, their wifibox-2 (http://www.embeddedarm.com/products/board-detail.php?product=TS-WIFIBOX-2). This product is based on the TS7553 CPU board (http://www.embeddedarm.com/products/board-detail.php?product=TS-7553#) which has a 250MHz Cavium ARM9 CPU.
We have had good success getting the elogd executable cross-compiled for use on this platform and have a working system. However, we are having significant issues with performance. When we click the "New" item to enter a new event there is a noticable delay. When clicking "Submit" there is a delay of approximately 10 seconds before the browser window displays the new event. With the elogd running on other platforms (Virtual Machine or netbook) the delays for these actions are very small - typically less than a second or imperceptible.
So here are some specific questions:
- Is it reasonable to expect a 250 MHz ARM processor to serve an elog logbook with user acceptable performance?
- Our cfg file is attached. Is there anything in the cfg file creating this performance problem.
- I have spent some time looking at this, and suspect that the delay is due to the cpu load of all the string manipulation and comparison operations (1200 calls to getcfg() on a submit). Are there other candidate sources of performance issues that should be considered?
- Does anyone have any suggestions on how to improve our performance?
- Does anyone have a suggestion for an alternative small and low-cost COTS platform to use to host the elogd application? (We would prefer to attain satisfactory performance on the Wifibox-2.)
Thanks for any help that can be offered.
Tim
|
HTTP headers should be parsed case insensitive, posted by André on Mon Jul 22 16:17:55 2024
|
I'm trying to run elog behind haproxy, but get the error "Invalid Content-Length in header" on posting.
As stated in the manual, haproxy rewrites all headers to lower case.
elogd parses the content-length header case sensitive which is against the HTTP RFC. This might also apply to other headers that get parsed.
For now I'm using the workaround from the manual:
global
h1-case-adjust content-length Content-Length
h1-case-adjust content-type Content-Type
backend elog
option h1-case-adjust-bogus-server
server elog 127.0.0.1:8080
But as the manual states, this should not be used as a permanent solution. |
HTML-File as attachement, posted by Becher on Tue Apr 5 22:39:20 2005
|
When I upload a HTML-File as attachement the file is shown as the
HTML-source and not as the formatted text. Is there a possibility to see the
HTML-attachements as formatted text like images are shown as images? |
HTML page formating, posted by Tomas Rudolf on Mon May 19 23:54:09 2003
|
Is there a possibility to integrate into ELOG some more features in terms
of page formating?
Currently, the .cfg file allows you to specify only the data structure of
the dataentry/consultation HTML page. And you only have very limited
possibilities to change the layout of the page (basically only the order of
attributes on the page and with the help of the .css file the font, color
and background of the page as a whole).
What we would like to do is to :
+ apply a stylesheet class to an attribute (change the particular TD class)
+ specify the width of a textfield (sometimes it is really not necessary to
have such a long textfield area for a 3-letter long code)
+ put an attribute on the same line as the previous one (instead of putting
it automatically on the next line)
Therefore, in addition to the current attributes & parameters, we suggest
the following syntax in the .cfg file:
+ parameter AttribPos which would specify the position of an attribute,
it's lenght (for text attributes only) and the .css class to apply
+ parameters in [] are optional
AttribPos AttribName = same_line, width, [class]
Examples:
AttribPos DateUp = 0,20, [important]
+ Attribute "DateUp" will be put on the next line, the textfield width will
be 20 characters and a .important class will be applied to it from the
default (or specified) .css file.
AttribPos DateUp = 1,15,
+ this puts the DateUp attribute on the same line, width 15
We believe that these improvements would help to make the ergonomy of the
screen better and thus facilitate the user-dataentry/consultation. |
HTML in attribute values, posted by soren poulsen on Thu Aug 6 11:40:11 2009
|
Hi,
I am using syntax like (from the doc):
Display Telephone = <a href="http://any.company.com/telbook.cgi?search=$Name">$Name's telephone number</a>
Until yesterday this was interpreted as HTML.
After upgrading to 2.7.7, I still get a valid link but the full HTML code is also displayed: the user sees
''<a href="http://any.company.com/telbook.cgi?search=myname">myname's telephone number</a>''
where he should only see:
''myname's telephone number''
I am 99% sure this is a consequence of the upgrade. Is there a way to get the original behaviour back?
Thanks a lot
Soren Poulsen
|
HTML in attribute values, posted by Richard Stamper on Tue Aug 22 14:19:43 2017
|
When one has "Allow HTML = 1" to permit HTML in attribute values, is it only a subset of HTML that is rendered?
I find that <br> and <a href="..."> tags are properly rendered, for example, but lists with <ol> and <ul> are not. |