ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
626
|
Wed Jul 28 21:29:28 2004 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | All | 2.5.3 | Re: WISHLIST: Type <attribute> = user |
Acknowledged. Added your vote to the wishlist. |
632
|
Wed Jul 28 22:08:16 2004 |
| Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Request | All | 2.5.3 | Re: WISHLIST: Type <attribute> = user |
> Acknowledged. Added your vote to the wishlist.
Thanks! |
643
|
Mon Aug 2 19:27:56 2004 |
| Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Request | All | 2.5.3 | Re: Wishlist: TOOLTIP for ATTRIBUTES |
> Ok, I added the option
>
> Tooltip <attribute> = ...
>
> I apply the HTML "title" tag to the whole table row, so the tooltip appears on the
> whole line, not only the attribute name. I guess this is much more intuitive. Give
> it a try. New version under CVS and available as a snapshot.
I like the implementation, especially with the tooltip popping up anywhere in the
area. Thanks. |
708
|
Fri Sep 24 19:17:52 2004 |
| Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Request | All | 2.5.4 | Enhanced "eLog Version" Variable |
Stefan, would it be ok to add the "minor" revision level to the VERSION
constant? I've been doing this after I download source just so I can keep
things straight, you keep cranking out versions ;->
EX:
#define VERSION "2.5.4-4"
BECOMES
#define VERSION "2.5.4-4-1.483" or something like that?
Just a thought.
Thanks |
709
|
Fri Sep 24 22:37:01 2004 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | All | 2.5.4 | Re: Enhanced "eLog Version" Variable |
Sorry for that. The idea is that the -4 is the minor number between releases
(mainly for bug fixes and impatient users (;-) ). I accidently overwrote the
-4 version several times when testing a new RPM building scheme, but I promise
to take more care in the future (:-)))
Having the CVS revision in the executable is however a good idea and I will
put it in.
> Stefan, would it be ok to add the "minor" revision level to the VERSION
> constant? I've been doing this after I download source just so I can keep
> things straight, you keep cranking out versions ;->
>
> EX:
> #define VERSION "2.5.4-4"
> BECOMES
> #define VERSION "2.5.4-4-1.483" or something like that?
>
> Just a thought.
>
> Thanks |
734
|
Thu Oct 14 16:33:51 2004 |
| Mike Stolove | mstolove@rogers.com | Request | Linux | 2.5.4-5 | Extra 'append on edit' action when adding attachment |
I have the following in a local logbook config:
append on edit = "\n\n[$date: $short_name]\n"
When I upload an attachment to an entry, it appears like the page is
getting refreshed in the browser and the 'append on edit' action is called
again. This results in two appended strings in the text entry, one for the
initial edit and one for the upload.
Is this by design or an inadvertent result of uploading an attachment?
My preferred handling of this - and perhaps a more intuitive behavior -
would be to have the append/prepend actions happen once and only once for
each edit or reply.
BTW Stephan, many thanks for the great program. |
731
|
Thu Oct 14 16:33:51 2004 |
| Mike Stolove | mstolove@rogers.com | Request | Linux | 2.5.4-5 | Extra 'append on edit' action when adding attachment |
I have the following in a local logbook config:
append on edit = "\n\n[$date: $short_name]\n"
When I upload an attachment to an entry, it appears like the page is
getting refreshed in the browser and the 'append on edit' action is called
again. This results in two appended strings in the text entry, one for the
initial edit and one for the upload.
Is this by design or an inadvertent result of uploading an attachment?
My preferred handling of this - and perhaps a more intuitive behavior -
would be to have the append/prepend actions happen once and only once for
each edit or reply.
BTW Stephan, many thanks for the great program. |
733
|
Thu Oct 14 21:45:32 2004 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | Linux | 2.5.4-5 | Re: Extra 'append on edit' action when adding attachment |
I fixed that in revision 1.496 (see CVS). |