> > Hi,
> > 
> > I've just upgraded from 2.6.2 to 2.7.3.
> > 
> > In my config file, I have
> > 
> > Quick filter: Date, ID.
> > 
> > When starting 2.7.3, across the top I now get 
> > 
> > "Error: Attribute "ID" for quick filter not found"
> > followed by an entry box.
> > 
> > If an ID is typed into that box, it sort of finds the right entry (+/- a few on occasion).
> > 
> > I cannot see any documented change that would affect how the Quick filter works.  Any clues?  Thanks.
> 
> Actually it is nowhere written the 'ID' for a quick filter should work. After investigating, I realize that it
> worked previously "by accident". I added in meantime some test so there is a warning for quick filter attributes
> which do not exist, and that's what you got. I loosened this test for 'ID' now in the current SVN version, so it
> can be used. It does however not display the single entry you want, but a page containing that entry (which then
> is displayed in bold). If you want exactly one entry, just add it's ID to the URL, like
> 
> https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/65767
> 
> for your previous entry.

Thanks Stefan!

Hi Stefan,

In the past I have requested the "mark whole thread" feature, not yet implimented.  At present, I 
edit (in my case) the icon on the first entry to indicate current status of the thread.  I have 
had an idea connected to this.

If you view a page, in threaded form, and collapsed, the header of the first entry of each thread is 
shown.  The order, however, is that of the timed order of the latest entry in that thread.


As an option, under the same circumstances (threaded, collapsed), if the header of the most recent 
entry was shown, then that could also be an indicator of closed thread, or of "marking whole thread" 
option (maybe would be enough for those who desire those features).  It also gives an indication of 
the current status of the thread without having to edit the original entry of the thread to edit 
(for example) the icon. 

Just a thought on how to improve a wonderful program ;-)

Hi Stefan,

Must have missed it when the fixed/not fixed thread marking got implimented.

Anyhow, my main point would still apply for where the thread is not yet fixed, but is in one of a number of possible
states  (waiting, panic, work-in-progress....).  Clearly you can label the latest entry in a thread with the latest
status, and icon, but when in collapsed mode, you only see the initial entry.  If the latest entry were shown
(optionally), then one can tell at a glance in the collapsed listings which entry may need direct attention.



> > In the past I have requested the "mark whole thread" feature, not yet implimented.
> 
> That's not correct, it is implemented. Just add an attribute for that. Assume you have problem reports, so you 
> add
> 
> Attributes = ..., Fixed
> Options Fixed = boolean
> Quick filter = Fixed
> 
> If you add a new entry, "Fixed" is false by default. All replies to that entry will contain then the same flag. 
> Now if you want to mark the whole thread as fixed, do the following:
> 
> - go into list display
> - display all entries in threaded mode
> - click on "Select"
> - select the thread you want to mark as fixed and click "Edit"
> - now keep all attributes, but check the "Fixed" check box
> 
> and voila, the whole thread will contain "Fixed = 1". Using the quick filter, you can now show all fixed threads 
> with one click.

Hi Stefan,

When Moving entry (and replies) from one log book to another, is it possible to prevent elog from renumbering
the entries' ID number(s) ($@MID@$).  While it may not be good practice, we've referred to these numbers in
cross-referencing, and it all goes wrong when an entry is moved from an "Open" thread to a "Closed" thread (cf
your FAQ about marking of whole threads).

In the cases I'm thinking about, i.e. from main logbook to archive logbook(s), there would never be a clash of
ID number.

Thanks,

David Pilgram.

Hi Stefan,

Any possibility on this one?

David Pilgram.
> Hi Stefan,
> 
> When Moving entry (and replies) from one log book to another, is it possible to prevent elog from renumbering
> the entries' ID number(s) ($@MID@$).  While it may not be good practice, we've referred to these numbers in
> cross-referencing, and it all goes wrong when an entry is moved from an "Open" thread to a "Closed" thread (cf
> your FAQ about marking of whole threads).
> 
> In the cases I'm thinking about, i.e. from main logbook to archive logbook(s), there would never be a clash of
> ID number.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> David Pilgram.

Thanks Stefan,  Downloading shortly and I'll let you know ;-)
> > Hi Stefan,
> > 
> > When Moving entry (and replies) from one log book to another, is it possible to prevent elog from renumbering
> > the entries' ID number(s) ($@MID@$).  While it may not be good practice, we've referred to these numbers in
> > cross-referencing, and it all goes wrong when an entry is moved from an "Open" thread to a "Closed" thread (cf
> > your FAQ about marking of whole threads).
> > 
> > In the cases I'm thinking about, i.e. from main logbook to archive logbook(s), there would never be a clash of
> > ID number.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > David Pilgram.
> 
> I have implemented this feature in revision 2205. You need to set the new flag "Preserve IDs = 1" in the 
> configuration. I have not tested this extensively, but I'm sure you will do it ;-)