Re: Converting logs, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Apr 22 20:06:51 2003
|
> `elconv' is just a simple tool to convert pre 2.0 log files to the current
> format. (Well, after all these confusions, dropping it from the future
> releases won't be surprising -at least for me- ;) You might try some
|
|
Re: Several Problems with 2.3.5, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Apr 22 20:17:34 2003
|
> We use ELOG 2.3.5 for Windows with a German language file and have found
> some new problems:
>
|
|
Re: problem with 20+ attachments, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Apr 22 20:24:03 2003
|
> Actually my report was NOT about this limitation. You have it - it is fine.
> The problem is that I add some 'zombies' or dead files to my logbook.
>
|
|
Re: problem with 20+ attachments, posted by Justin Dieters on Tue Apr 22 22:23:27 2003
|
I've been using elog for several months now, and one thing that's always
seemed odd to me are the things like max number of attachments and max
attachment size are defined right in the source code, and not in the config
|
|
Re: problem with 20+ attachments, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Apr 23 08:46:14 2003
|
> I've been using elog for several months now, and one thing that's always
> seemed odd to me are the things like max number of attachments and max
> attachment size are defined right in the source code, and not in the config
|
Cookie problem using Apache 1.3.23 as Proxy, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu May 1 10:27:17 2003
|
Today I found out that Apache 1.3.23 (and probably 1.3.24) has a problem
with ELOG if used as a proxy server. Due to a bug in Apache, only one
cookie is transmitted through the proxy at a time. This makes it impossible
|
User Profile - Access to logbook group, posted by Tomas Rudolf on Fri May 2 00:34:26 2003
|
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone had a solution for my problem.
|
|
Re: User Profile - Access to logbook group, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri May 2 08:45:38 2003
|
> We would like to give access to selected users to only their Group. So that
> for instance Users1 cannot access the books of group Users3. I was
> wondering if there is any notion of "User profile" or security per logbook
|