We have an auto-incrementing reference attribute defined as:

# RFC

Format RFC = 0,narrowattribname,narrowattribvalue,60,60
Preset RFC = RFC-######
Preset On Duplicate RFC = RFC-######
Tooltip RFC = A unique reference will be generated for this Request For Change

We also have a "Created by/when" attribute.  Looking at the values this seems to be set when the user clicks "New" whereas the time stamp that appears on the line after the  $@MID@$ seems to be set when the user clicks "Submit".

# Created

Format Created = 0,attribname,attribvalue,70,100
Preset Created = $long_name ($short_name) on $date
Preset On Duplicate Created = $long_name ($short_name) on $date

Every once in a while the incrementing stops working and the number 'sticks' or misses some out.  It looks as if it might be because multiple people are adding entries concurrently.  Could the occasion where there is a gap in the sequence (171-174) be where people abandoned changes (clicked on "Back") after having numbers allocated?  Here is a list showing the discrepancies.

Date        Item     Time Stamp (from the line after $@MID@$)  "Created" attribute time stamp

22/09/08    124      16:15:10                                   11:58

22/09/08    125      16:33:54                                   16:24

22/09/08    125      16:35:37                                   16:33              Should be 126

...

10/10/08    146      10:39:09                                   10:30                    Correct

10/10/08    146      10:46:57                                   10:35              Should be 147

10/10/08    147      13:04:03                                   13:02              Should be 148

10/10/08    148      15:11:38                                   15:00              Should be 149

...

17/11/08    171      10:21                                      10:17              Correct

17/11/08    174      14:30                                      13:47              Should be 172

17/11/08    175      16:14                                      16:04              Should be 173

17/11/08    176      16:49                                      16:38              Should be 174

...

25/11/08    187      15:49:58                                   15:47              Correct

25/11/08    187      15:52:39                                   15:48              Should be 188

25/11/08    188      16:49:56                                   16:44              Should be 189

25/11/08    188      16:52:40                                   16:40              Should be 190

25/11/08    188      16:55:17                                   16:43              Should be 191

Let me know if you need any more information.

regards

Steve

Having "Top group" in a config-file for Windows will cause:

GET / HTTP/1.1
Host: eudr6j03j:8084
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.9.0.5) Gecko/20
08120122 Firefox/3.0.5
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
Accept-Language: sv-se,sv;q=0.8,en-us;q=0.5,en;q=0.3
Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate
Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7
Keep-Alive: 300
Connection: keep-alive
Cookie: unm=mambrus; upwd=U2lzc2kx; urem=0
Cache-Control: max-age=0


Internal error, no valid header!

Removing "top group" makes elogd.exe work. The error is repeatable and the same config file works on the same version of Elog on Linux. Elog was compiled with Cygwin.

Stack error is caused when an entry is submitted in a e-mail notification enabled log when a new entry is submitted. This error does not happen on linux (same Elog version, same config file).

Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help.

-----------------------------2916890032591
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="attfile"; filename=""
Content-Type: application/octet-stream


-----------------------------2916890032591--

timezone: 0, offset: 0
      6 [main] elogd 2816 _cygtls::handle_exceptions: Error while dumping state
(probably corrupted stack)
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

If I open an elog entry as read-only then attachments show as links which can be clicked to open the attachment.  However, if I open an entry using Edit then attachments show as text with a delete button - I would expect to be able to read attachments when editing an entry but there may be some good reason for not being able to.

Also, on attachments, if I click on the attachment icon (paperclip) on the list page the URL encodes "/" as "%2f", e.g.

http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:8080/Change_Log/..%2FChange_Log%2F090205_123135%2FCHANGE_CONTROL_NOTICE_050209.doc and I get the following error:

"Invalid URL: Change_Log/..%2FChange_Log%2F090205_123135%2FCHANGE_CONTROL_NOTICE_050209.doc" .  If I then change all occurrences of "%2f" to "/" the link works.

We don't use attachments very often but occasionally they are just what you need - and so is elog!

great piece of software - many thanks for sharing it

Steve

Apologies if these are known bugs, I'm very busy at the moment but I wanted to post this before I forget:

I'm using Safari on a Mac to make Elog entries.

1) The preview of some pdf attachments in edit mode displays huge areas of white space around each page. I can send examples if you'd like - please email me directly, for some reason I never get email notifications from this forum (and they aren't being tagged as spam, so I don't know where they go).

2) When that happens, the text entry area for ELcode format expands horizontally to match the huge pdf file width. Text without line feeds then doesn't wrap until the huge window width is filled, so I have to scroll horizontally all the time while editing to see what I've written.

3) So I turned off attachment previewing as a workaround (Preview attachments = 0 ). That worked fine by not expanding the entry area, but I noticed some odd behavior. The list of attachments below the text entry area is badly formatted. Here's a screen shot:

I tried to reproduce this with a new entry but the text was formatted properly for that entry.

P.S. While editing this entry, I see that the text area width is again being set by the width of the picture I've attached - try it yourself; if you try to resize your browser window smaller while editing, the text will only wrap until the width of the attachment is reached - the text no longer wraps at smaller widths than the attachment. 

Hi.  I'm pretty new to ELOG, so I'm not sure if I'm doing something wrong.

I have a bunch of fields set so that after an entry has been submitted, they cannot edit certain fields.  When I click the edit button, everything looks restricted as it should be, but if I click Preview, the user is then able to change the fixed attributes.

Is there anyway to remove the preview button inside the edit page, or is anyone else having this issue?

Thanks,

Allen

Hi,

There's seems to be a memory leak with elogd.exe running windows.  I had this problem with older version of elogd.exe, i've just upgrade to the latest and the problems still exist. I've had this issue with earlier versions.  I've just upgrade elog to the latest 2.76 version. The memory leak still persist. I really appreciate if you or anyone here can help me resolve this issue.

Thank!

JH

A few days after I create entries in my logbooks, they are being deleted. Has this happened to anyone before?