Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 757 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Emaildown Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  67926   Wed May 20 22:12:49 2015 Reply David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukBug reportOtherthis oneRe: edit somebody else's draft
> this elog offers me to edit a draft message, then yells at me "only some other user can edit this draft!!!".
> methinks I should only be offered to edit draft messages that I own or I can edit. K.O.
I find it odd that I can see someone elses draft, but never one that I am in the middle of composing (using a
different tab of the browser) in the elog listing.  There's one such draft Konstantin refers to in the logbook
listings now - last one was dark blue, this one a pink background, is there a reason for these different colours?
  67955   Fri Jun 5 12:28:21 2015 Entry David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukCommentLinuxELOG V3.1.0-ac7Emails generated by Elog

I am one who received an email every time there is a new entry in this forum.

I have just noticed that since May 20, every email contains the message "An old ELOG entry has been updated: "

whereas before that date, the vast majority say "A new ELOG entry has been submitted: "

Is this something to do with the saving of draft messages?

Talking of which, I see my draft of this message shows up in the forum before I have submitted it.

  67978   Tue Jun 9 16:17:06 2015 Reply David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukQuestionLinuxV3.1.1-2c4f838Re: subject line bug on resumit elog entries as new?

Hi Stefan,

I see that you've updated the elog running this forum today, 5 versions after you reported fixing the "A new elog entry has been entered" and "An old elog entry has been updated" issue.  But the emails coming out are still all of the "An old elog entry...", rather than "A new..."

David.

Stefan Ritt wrote:

I fixed both issues, now resubmitting an entry or submitting a new entry both yields "New LEOG entry".

Jacky Li wrote:

Hi,

I updated an old elog entry and resubmit it as new by checking the box resubmit as new.   Does the subject line should said it is a "New ELOG entry" instead of "Updated ELOG entry"?  Thank you.

Also when some people submit a new elog, the subject line is "Updated ELOG entry".  This is a bit odd.  I can't reproduce that bug when I did my test. 

Jacky 

 

 

  67980   Tue Jun 9 16:51:55 2015 Reply David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukQuestionLinuxV3.1.1-2c4f838Re: subject line bug on resumit elog entries as new?

Hi Stefan,

The email sent from here had he expected (correct) message "A new ELOG entry..."

Thanks, David.

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Any better now?

David Pilgram wrote:

Hi Stefan,

I see that you've updated the elog running this forum today, 5 versions after you reported fixing the "A new elog entry has been entered" and "An old elog entry has been updated" issue.  But the emails coming out are still all of the "An old elog entry...", rather than "A new..."

 

  67984   Tue Jun 9 17:17:11 2015  David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukBug reportLinuxV3.1.1-22022e6Problem with a draft message

Hi Stefan,

I had started to write a completely different bug report, but then realised I had not checked a detail.  I had written about one sentence.  So I decided to abort the message, and hit the "back" button.  Only I found that this had created a new entry in the elog listings.  I immediately went in and deleted it, but I had expected the "Back" button to have aborted the entry (as it does in 2.9.x) not to submit the entry!

It doesn't seem to have created an email, though.  And for the sake of all your users, I'd not want to experiment here on the matter too much!

  67985   Tue Jun 9 17:21:25 2015 Reply David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukBug reportLinuxV3.1.1-22022e6Re: Problem with a draft message

Just to comment that I submitted the entry below by pressing the "Back" button!

David Pilgram wrote:

Hi Stefan,

I had started to write a completely different bug report, but then realised I had not checked a detail.  I had written about one sentence.  So I decided to abort the message, and hit the "back" button.  Only I found that this had created a new entry in the elog listings.  I immediately went in and deleted it, but I had expected the "Back" button to have aborted the entry (as it does in 2.9.x) not to submit the entry!

It doesn't seem to have created an email, though.  And for the sake of all your users, I'd not want to experiment here on the matter too much!

 

  67986   Tue Jun 9 17:23:27 2015 Reply David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukBug reportLinuxV3.1.1-22022e6Re: Problem with a draft message

Just to comment that the expected emails that one would have expected with the last two entries have either
been held up or simply have not been generated and sent - both the preceeding entries were submitted by using the "Back" button, this time I'll use the "Submit" button, which should generate a email.

David Pilgram wrote:

Just to comment that I submitted the entry below by pressing the "Back" button!

David Pilgram wrote:

Hi Stefan,

I had started to write a completely different bug report, but then realised I had not checked a detail.  I had written about one sentence.  So I decided to abort the message, and hit the "back" button.  Only I found that this had created a new entry in the elog listings.  I immediately went in and deleted it, but I had expected the "Back" button to have aborted the entry (as it does in 2.9.x) not to submit the entry!

It doesn't seem to have created an email, though.  And for the sake of all your users, I'd not want to experiment here on the matter too much!

 

 

  67989   Tue Jun 9 20:26:00 2015 Reply David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukBug reportLinuxV3.1.1-22022e6Re: Problem with a draft message

I missed or don't remember that post.  My vote is replace "Back" with "Delete" - or "Abort"

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Just read what I wrote at elog:67983

David Pilgram wrote:

Just to comment that the expected emails that one would have expected with the last two entries have either
been held up or simply have not been generated and sent - both the preceeding entries were submitted by using the "Back" button, this time I'll use the "Submit" button, which should generate a email.

David Pilgram wrote:

Just to comment that I submitted the entry below by pressing the "Back" button!

David Pilgram wrote:

Hi Stefan,

I had started to write a completely different bug report, but then realised I had not checked a detail.  I had written about one sentence.  So I decided to abort the message, and hit the "back" button.  Only I found that this had created a new entry in the elog listings.  I immediately went in and deleted it, but I had expected the "Back" button to have aborted the entry (as it does in 2.9.x) not to submit the entry!

It doesn't seem to have created an email, though.  And for the sake of all your users, I'd not want to experiment here on the matter too much!

 

 

 

 

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6