Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 763 of 806  Not logged in ELOG logo
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
ID Date Icon Author Author Emaildown Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  67596   Fri Nov 1 21:47:12 2013 Question Mark CampbellCAMP2MAR@police.nsw.gov.auQuestionLinuxV2.9.2-245"Show only new entries" stuck for one user

 For one user in our ELog installation the "Show only new entries" button seems to be stuck on one particular date and time " ...

 

New entries since: Tue Oct 22 10:56:27 2013

 

this occurs with different browsers and PC's

For other users it works as described in this forum post ...

"When you are active browsing entries, your activity is recorded (only the time) in the password file. Now when you are inactive for more than one hour, you are considered "logged out", and your last activity is taken as a filter for new entries. That means you see new entries since your last activity in the logbook. " https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/1612

 

Regards

Mark.

  67599   Tue Nov 5 14:35:44 2013 Reply Mark CampbellCAMP2MAR@police.nsw.gov.auQuestionLinuxV2.9.2-245Re: "Show only new entries" stuck for one user

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Mark Campbell wrote:

 For one user in our ELog installation the "Show only new entries" button seems to be stuck on one particular date and time " ...

 

New entries since: Tue Oct 22 10:56:27 2013

 

this occurs with different browsers and PC's

For other users it works as described in this forum post ...

"When you are active browsing entries, your activity is recorded (only the time) in the password file. Now when you are inactive for more than one hour, you are considered "logged out", and your last activity is taken as a filter for new entries. That means you see new entries since your last activity in the logbook. " https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/1612

 

Regards

Mark.

Sure it will be stuck on a date/time, until you show "inactivity". So wait for >1h, and then check again. You will see the time updated.

/Stefan 

 Hi Stefan,

well I just logged on tonight after being "inactive"  (away from work) for two days and the "Show only new entries" button is still stuck at "Tue Oct 22 10:56:27 2013". 

Could it be that I am have left myself logged in on another machine somewhere?

How does ELog determine "activity"?

Regards

Mark.

  67600   Tue Nov 5 15:25:59 2013 Reply Mark CampbellCAMP2MAR@police.nsw.gov.auQuestionLinuxV2.9.2-245Re: "Show only new entries" stuck for one user

Mark Campbell wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Mark Campbell wrote:

 For one user in our ELog installation the "Show only new entries" button seems to be stuck on one particular date and time " ...

 

New entries since: Tue Oct 22 10:56:27 2013

 

this occurs with different browsers and PC's

For other users it works as described in this forum post ...

"When you are active browsing entries, your activity is recorded (only the time) in the password file. Now when you are inactive for more than one hour, you are considered "logged out", and your last activity is taken as a filter for new entries. That means you see new entries since your last activity in the logbook. " https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/1612

 

Regards

Mark.

Sure it will be stuck on a date/time, until you show "inactivity". So wait for >1h, and then check again. You will see the time updated.

/Stefan 

 Hi Stefan,

well I just logged on tonight after being "inactive"  (away from work) for two days and the "Show only new entries" button is still stuck at "Tue Oct 22 10:56:27 2013". 

Could it be that I am have left myself logged in on another machine somewhere?

How does ELog determine "activity"?

Regards

Mark.

 I just had a look in the password file and found ...

 <full_name>Mark Campbell</full_name>

    <last_logout>Tue Oct 22 10:56:27 2013</last_logout>

    <last_activity>Wed Nov  6 01:17:08 2013</last_activity>

    <inactive>0</inactive>

 
So it appears that the <last_logout> tag is not being updated.
 
 
---------------------------------------------------
 
Some activity from the messages file ...
 
18-Oct-2013 15:52:12 [2003883@10.11.112.178] {ops} LOGOUT
21-Oct-2013 06:40:03 [10.17.48.165] {ops} LOGIN user "2003883" (attempt)
21-Oct-2013 06:40:04 [10.17.48.165] {ops} LOGIN user "2003883" (success)
22-Oct-2013 07:01:51 [10.17.48.176] {ops} LOGIN user "2003883" (attempt)
22-Oct-2013 07:01:51 [10.17.48.176] {ops} LOGIN user "2003883" (success)
22-Oct-2013 07:10:13 [2003883@10.17.48.176] {ops} LOGOUT
22-Oct-2013 13:26:32 [10.17.48.176] {ops} LOGIN user "2003883" (attempt)
22-Oct-2013 13:26:32 [10.17.48.176] {ops} LOGIN user "2003883" (success)
22-Oct-2013 14:13:16 [2003883@10.17.48.165] {ops} LOGOUT
23-Oct-2013 06:24:30 [10.17.48.165] {ops} LOGIN user "2003883" (attempt)
23-Oct-2013 06:24:30 [10.17.48.165] {ops} LOGIN user "2003883" (success)
25-Oct-2013 22:25:42 [10.17.48.90] {ops} LOGIN user "2003883" (attempt)
25-Oct-2013 22:25:42 [10.17.48.90] {ops} LOGIN user "2003883" (success)
25-Oct-2013 22:43:45 [2003883@10.17.48.90] {ops} LOGOUT
 
 
 
Regards
 
Mark.
  67601   Tue Nov 5 20:04:11 2013 Reply Mark CampbellCAMP2MAR@police.nsw.gov.auQuestionLinuxV2.9.2-245Re: "Show only new entries" stuck for one user

Mark Campbell wrote:

Mark Campbell wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Mark Campbell wrote:

 For one user in our ELog installation the "Show only new entries" button seems to be stuck on one particular date and time " ...

 

New entries since: Tue Oct 22 10:56:27 2013

 

this occurs with different browsers and PC's

For other users it works as described in this forum post ...

"When you are active browsing entries, your activity is recorded (only the time) in the password file. Now when you are inactive for more than one hour, you are considered "logged out", and your last activity is taken as a filter for new entries. That means you see new entries since your last activity in the logbook. " https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/1612

 

Regards

Mark.

Sure it will be stuck on a date/time, until you show "inactivity". So wait for >1h, and then check again. You will see the time updated.

/Stefan 

 Hi Stefan,

well I just logged on tonight after being "inactive"  (away from work) for two days and the "Show only new entries" button is still stuck at "Tue Oct 22 10:56:27 2013". 

Could it be that I am have left myself logged in on another machine somewhere?

How does ELog determine "activity"?

Regards

Mark.

 I just had a look in the password file and found ...

 <full_name>Mark Campbell</full_name>

    <last_logout>Tue Oct 22 10:56:27 2013</last_logout>

    <last_activity>Wed Nov  6 01:17:08 2013</last_activity>

    <inactive>0</inactive>

 
So it appears that the <last_logout> tag is not being updated.
 
 
---------------------------------------------------
 
Some activity from the messages file ...
 
18-Oct-2013 15:52:12 [2003883@10.11.112.178] {ops} LOGOUT
21-Oct-2013 06:40:03 [10.17.48.165] {ops} LOGIN user "2003883" (attempt)
21-Oct-2013 06:40:04 [10.17.48.165] {ops} LOGIN user "2003883" (success)
22-Oct-2013 07:01:51 [10.17.48.176] {ops} LOGIN user "2003883" (attempt)
22-Oct-2013 07:01:51 [10.17.48.176] {ops} LOGIN user "2003883" (success)
22-Oct-2013 07:10:13 [2003883@10.17.48.176] {ops} LOGOUT
22-Oct-2013 13:26:32 [10.17.48.176] {ops} LOGIN user "2003883" (attempt)
22-Oct-2013 13:26:32 [10.17.48.176] {ops} LOGIN user "2003883" (success)
22-Oct-2013 14:13:16 [2003883@10.17.48.165] {ops} LOGOUT
23-Oct-2013 06:24:30 [10.17.48.165] {ops} LOGIN user "2003883" (attempt)
23-Oct-2013 06:24:30 [10.17.48.165] {ops} LOGIN user "2003883" (success)
25-Oct-2013 22:25:42 [10.17.48.90] {ops} LOGIN user "2003883" (attempt)
25-Oct-2013 22:25:42 [10.17.48.90] {ops} LOGIN user "2003883" (success)
25-Oct-2013 22:43:45 [2003883@10.17.48.90] {ops} LOGOUT
 
 
 
Regards
 
Mark.

 Yah! It's working again ...

New entries since:

Wed Nov 6 01:51:02 2013

 

I found out I was still logged on to one workstation, I logged off from there, waited a few hours and tried again. All good.

 

Regards Mark

  65852   Thu Apr 24 22:18:24 2008 Disagree Chuck BrostBrost_chuck@solarturbines.comQuestionWindows2.7.3Increment a field automatically on a new thread vs every entry

I may have missed it when reading the logs, if so, sorry about that, but I would like to know if there is a way to set a field, let us call it "process run"  Ok let me give you some details on this.

a process run may have several "work orders" or sets of parts/items in it, so it will have several separate entries in the log  such as:

date##, run123, part 1, quantity, comment

date##, run123, part2, quantity, comment

date##, run123, part3, quantity, comment

date##, run123, part4, quantity, comment

I thought perhaps to have them use the reply function to add the other 3 items of the same run, and that would work if I could find a way to set 'process run' to auto increment, say perhaps, when the next 'New' entry was entered.  Is there something in place that can already do this?  If this is possible, I thought I would see if I can change the button for 'New' to something like 'New Run' and reply to 'Add Workorder' or something along that line so there is no confusion when entering the data.

Any suggestions you might provide are greatfully accepted.

Chuck

  65858   Fri Apr 25 19:33:24 2008 Reply Chuck BrostBrost_chuck@solarturbines.comQuestionWindows2.7.3Re: Increment a field automatically on a new thread vs every entry

Ok, nevermind that one, Dumb Question I think, now that I have figured out that the field I was concerned with does not increment in a reply already.  So.. that only leaves my one question, is there somewhere that I can change the text, not the action, on the menu so that I can do a reply, but have the link list as something like "New Item".?

Chuck Brost wrote:

I may have missed it when reading the logs, if so, sorry about that, but I would like to know if there is a way to set a field, let us call it "process run"  Ok let me give you some details on this.

a process run may have several "work orders" or sets of parts/items in it, so it will have several separate entries in the log  such as:

date##, run123, part 1, quantity, comment

date##, run123, part2, quantity, comment

date##, run123, part3, quantity, comment

date##, run123, part4, quantity, comment

I thought perhaps to have them use the reply function to add the other 3 items of the same run, and that would work if I could find a way to set 'process run' to auto increment, say perhaps, when the next 'New' entry was entered.  Is there something in place that can already do this?  If this is possible, I thought I would see if I can change the button for 'New' to something like 'New Run' and reply to 'Add Workorder' or something along that line so there is no confusion when entering the data.

Any suggestions you might provide are greatfully accepted.

Chuck

  66545   Wed Sep 16 16:37:35 2009 Question Chuck BrostBrost_chuck@solarturbines.comQuestionWindows2.7.6-2236Elog & SSL Export to CSV , Problem

 

We use eLOG with IE. Once we turned on SSL, it is no longer possible to "Export to CSV" and save the output.

The error that we get is:

Internet Explorer was not able to open this Internet site. The requested site is either unavailable or cannot be found. Please try again later.

This is documented on Microsoft's site: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/316431

It is considered a feature with no fix. Basically the browser is honoring a request from the server which is "Pragma: no-cache". Problem can be reproduced in IE versions 6 through 8.
 

  66549   Thu Sep 17 18:31:44 2009 Reply Chuck BrostBrost_chuck@solarturbines.comQuestionWindows2.7.6-2236Re: Elog & SSL Export to CSV , Problem

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Chuck Brost wrote:

 

 

 

We use eLOG with IE. Once we turned on SSL, it is no longer possible to "Export to CSV" and save the output.

The error that we get is:

Internet Explorer was not able to open this Internet site. The requested site is either unavailable or cannot be found. Please try again later.

This is documented on Microsoft's site: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/316431

It is considered a feature with no fix. Basically the browser is honoring a request from the server which is "Pragma: no-cache". Problem can be reproduced in IE versions 6 through 8.
 

I see the same problem with IE. The knowledge base says that one should remove the "no-cache" statement from the header, but that has strange side effects: Assume you export a logbook to a CSV file, and a few days later you export it again, since many things changed. But you browser will in that case not retrieve the new logbook, but read the old CSV file from the cache. But the browser does not tell you this, so you see an old version of the logbok without knowing this, which can be dangerous. So I better leave the "no-cache" in the header. The workaroung is not to click on "Save" on the file download dialog, but on "Open". You see then the CSV data inside the browser and can copy/paste it into a notepad document, then save it. 

 Ah, now this is humorous, when the client first came to me, that was almost exactly the work around I gave him, open it, CTRL-A to highlight it all, CTRL-C to copy it, Move to the excel spreadsheet, CTRL-V to paste it into Excel. Select Data, Text to Columns, and you have an Excel Spreadsheet.   They wanted me to post the change in function anyway, though I told Vamsi, "just watch, someone will post the same workaround that I already gave to the clients".  So you see why I find it amusing.  I would say Great Minds Think Alike, but that would be giving myself a bit too much credit (grin).  First, thank you for proving me right on my prediction and if you should happen to make a change that would get around this SSL change in behavior, it would make a group of manufacturing types that are not quite as comfortable with computers as we are, very happy.   Please let us know.

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6