| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
1186
|
Tue Jun 7 17:59:54 2005 |
 | Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Bug report | All | 2.6.0-beta | Re: Find seems to ignore Start Date |
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | It seems that making a search in which one selects *only* a start date *and* a "last" number of days
does not works correctly ..
Elog infact simply ignores the start date, showing the last N-days entries ..
This is a bug IMHO, and prevents me to include a quick filter for user, making easy to select a particular year/week in a JS calendar and than using this date as the start date for the logbook ...
here is an example: http://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/?mode=threaded&reverse=1&npp=8&ma=6&da=14&ya=2004&last=7
If one specify *also* an "end date" the beaviour is correct.. |
uhm ... maybe I have realized ...
it's End Date to be used for this task... right??
If it is (as it seems) the search form is quite confusing .. as the "/ Last " select box it's just after the "start date" ... |
|
1188
|
Wed Jun 8 16:48:59 2005 |
| Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Bug report | Linux | 2.6.0-beta | Re: Menu text ignored?? |
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | I tried to insert a row in the menu but it seems to totally ignore the command ...
both inserting a filename and simply typeing "Menu text = <b>PIPPO</b>" brings to a page with *no* "PIPPO" in the HTML source ...
is this a bug or another my misconfiguration??? |
uhm... I saw that this parameter makes the file to be included in the "entry" view...
Is there a global or "List Menu text" option? ... my goal is to add a JS calendar just at the left of the current "Show Last" button ... more generally I would like to be able to add custom icons, bottons or links to the menu..
uh oh ... just maked some tests before posting ... "Find Menu text" does my job !!!?!?!!!! why "Find" in the name? it is displayed in the list view, not Find ... Am I completely out?
BTW:
there is a typo ("lanugae") at http://midas.psi.ch/elog/config.html  |
|
1204
|
Mon Jun 20 09:56:28 2005 |
 | Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Question | Windows | V2.5.4 | Re: prevent CVS and XML exports |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Paul Paquette wrote: | Hello All and Happy Father's Day,
How do I prevent Anonymous Users from exporting the Data when using the search funtion?
Thank You
Paul |
By not allowing anonymous access at all. The CVS and XML exports do not contain more information than anonymous users can see on the web page, so there is no reason to prevent it. Anybody could view all pages anonymously (if guest access is allowed) and reconstruct the CVS data easily. |
You are obviously talking about CSV (Comma Separated Values), and not CVS (Cuncurrent Verioning System).. |
|
1205
|
Mon Jun 20 09:59:10 2005 |
| Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Bug report | Linux | 2.6.0-beta | Re: Menu text ignored?? |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Well, maybe I should allow both options "Find menu text" and "List menu text", change it in the documentation, and in a year from now remove the "Find menu text". |
It's a great way to solve the misunderstanding IMHO, tnx  |
|
1208
|
Wed Jun 22 11:04:41 2005 |
 | Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Bug report | All | 2.6.0beta2 | [BUG] show only new entries |
the new link "show only new entries" is very useful but seems to still have some problems:
- I can't find any simple way to return to the "every entries" display .. may be the link has to be switched to a checkbox to be actived or not
- I found a way (at least)... following the "config" link, doing nothing and coming back restores the view .. this is a feature now, but when a less tricky mechanism will be implemented will become a bug
another entry for my wishlist:
writeing the above code I noticed that the elcode buttons are lacking of a "" shortcut .. it will be very usefull
PS:
Writeing the wish above I noticed that the [ *] is interpreted as an item also otside the LIST tag .. so .. or the LIST tag is optional, or the [ *] should not be interpreted outside of it ... it's another bug ? P |
|
1210
|
Thu Jun 23 11:03:18 2005 |
| Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | | Linux | 2.6.0beta2 | [BUG] quick filter |
it seems that the select box of quick filters are showing also the "{n}" appended to the Attributes in order to obtain conditional Attributes ...
see the snapshot attached |
|
1217
|
Mon Jun 27 15:09:12 2005 |
| Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Bug report | All | 2.6.0beta2 | Re: [BUG] show only new entries |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | the new link "show only new entries" is very useful but seems to still have some problems:
- I can't find any simple way to return to the "every entries" display .. may be the link has to be switched to a checkbox to be actived or not
- I found a way (at least)... following the "config" link, doing nothing and coming back restores the view .. this is a feature now, but when a less tricky mechanism will be implemented will become a bug
|
I added a "Show all entries" link to go back.
|
I think you only committed the changes to elcode.js but not the ones relative to elogd.c ... the Attribute quick filter is now empty, and no "show all entries" is ever displayed |
|
1218
|
Mon Jun 27 15:16:37 2005 |
| Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | | Linux | 2.6.0beta2 | Re: [BUG] quick filter |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | it seems that the select box of quick filters are showing also the "{n}" appended to the Attributes in order to obtain conditional Attributes ...
see the snapshot attached |
Fixed in current CVS.
BTW, I would display the date selection calender in a new floating window, not to take away all the precious screen space at the top. Then I would use the same calendar as for the date attributes, not to confuse users with two different styles. |
Are you sure you really committed it ?
Reguarding the calendar... the picture is just one of my tests .. I started using a popup window, but it makes complicated to do all the job I want.. so my current idea is to implemnet it a a dropdown layer, it will save both the precious space and the functionality..
I don't use the existing style becouse of, in the first popup try, it was to simple .. now I can't use it directly becouse I don't need any popup anymore.. but ok, we can keep the same style of course |