Compile issues on Fedora withe current elog source, posted by Allen Tuttle on Tue Sep 11 19:46:40 2018
|
Tried compiling on FC27 and 28, both result in binaries but with serious issues; writing data larger than then allowed.
Example output:
make
gcc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -Wno-deprecated-declarations |
Re: Compile issues on Fedora withe current elog source, posted by Allen Tuttle on Wed Sep 12 15:20:11 2018
|
I don't see the update on elog/download/tar/.
Do you keep builds elsewhere, perhaps on get or sourceforge?
Stefan |
Re: Compile issues on Fedora withe current elog source, posted by Allen Tuttle on Wed Sep 12 15:25:07 2018
|
I would like to try the new code, I don't see it on elog/download/tar/.
Do you keep updates elsewhere like on get or sourceforge?
Stefan |
Re: Compile issues on Fedora withe current elog source, posted by Allen Tuttle on Wed Sep 12 15:57:31 2018
|
A quick test suggests I can't just replace sprintf with snprintf.
Original error:
src/elogd.c:4503:4: note: ‘sprintf’ output between 1 and 542 bytes into a destination of size 256 [-Wformat-overflow=] |
Re: Compile issues on Fedora withe current elog source, posted by Allen Tuttle on Thu Sep 13 06:12:59 2018
|
Latest compile effort on Fedora 28 using the bitbucket source downloaded at 21:12 PDT:
make
gcc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -Wno-deprecated-declarations -Imxml -DHAVE_SSL -c -o mxml.o mxml/mxml.c |
'Reply' removes attachments from the original message, posted by Alexander ZVYAGIN on Tue Apr 22 17:13:08 2003
|
It seems when I use "reply" with an attachments, the original attachments of
the message are removed.
|
problem with 20+ attachments, posted by Alexander ZVYAGIN on Tue Apr 22 17:17:36 2003
|
It seems that maximal number of attachments is about 20. When you try to add
more, a new entry _is_ added to the logbook but the refernce to it is not
added to the web page. |
Re: 'Reply' removes attachments from the original message, posted by Alexander ZVYAGIN on Tue Apr 22 17:20:19 2003
|
> > It seems when I use "reply" with an attachments, the original attachments of
> > the message are removed.
> >
|