Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 765 of 796  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Datedown Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  299   Tue Apr 22 19:27:28 2003 Entry Marcus Meyermarcus.meyer@gmx.netQuestion  Re: Converting logs
> I would like to dump mylog files into comma/tab seperated files. Is there 
> an easy way to do it?
> 
> I tried to run elconv, but had no success. Always returns an error. 
> 
> Thanks,
> k. 

Hi!

Same for me.

Here is the error:

Cannot find any ??????.log file in this directory.

THANX,
mm
  298   Tue Apr 22 17:34:52 2003 Reply Alexander ZVYAGINAlexander.Zviagine@cern.chBug report  Re: problem with 20+ attachments
> > It seems that maximal number of attachments is about 20. When you try to add
> > more, a new entry _is_ added to the logbook but the refernce to it is not
> > added to the web page.
> 
> Uhhh, Mr. "monster of number of attachments" gave it's stroke!

:)  I wanted to post a message with ~200 attachments.

>Well, we never 
> had such large number of attachments so I forgot to put a waring in. The 
> limit comes from 
> 
> #define MAX_ATTACHMENTS  20
> 
> in elogd.c which you can easily increase (as long as you have RAM!) and 
> recompile.

Actually my report was NOT about this limitation. You have it - it is fine.
The problem is that I add some 'zombies' or dead files to my logbook.

BTW is there a tool to check the 'integrity' of a logbook? That all
attachments are in place,  there are no dead files, etc. I perfectly
understand that it is not _highly_ desired or needed, but with the two last
problems (auto-removing of attached files and silent adding a new ones with
20+ attachments) I have doubts that our logbook in a good state. And we just
started to use it. And I am still so excited about it!!
  297   Tue Apr 22 17:21:36 2003 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug report  Re: problem with 20+ attachments
> It seems that maximal number of attachments is about 20. When you try to add
> more, a new entry _is_ added to the logbook but the refernce to it is not
> added to the web page.

Uhhh, Mr. "monster of number of attachments" gave it's stroke! Well, we never 
had such large number of attachments so I forgot to put a waring in. The 
limit comes from 

#define MAX_ATTACHMENTS  20

in elogd.c which you can easily increase (as long as you have RAM!) and 
recompile.
  296   Tue Apr 22 17:20:19 2003 Reply Alexander ZVYAGINAlexander.Zviagine@cern.chBug report  Re: 'Reply' removes attachments from the original message
> > It seems when I use "reply" with an attachments, the original attachments of
> > the message are removed.
> > 
> > I use elog-2.3.5
> > 
> > Alexander.
> 
> Please see elog:280 . I will releae 2.3.6 with this bugfix somewhen during 
> this week.
> 
> - Stefan

Wow! Fast reply!!! Thanks a lot!
  295   Tue Apr 22 17:17:36 2003 Question Alexander ZVYAGINAlexander.Zviagine@cern.chBug report  problem with 20+ attachments
It seems that maximal number of attachments is about 20. When you try to add
more, a new entry _is_ added to the logbook but the refernce to it is not
added to the web page.
  294   Tue Apr 22 17:16:31 2003 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug report  Re: 'Reply' removes attachments from the original message
> It seems when I use "reply" with an attachments, the original attachments of
> the message are removed.
> 
> I use elog-2.3.5
> 
> Alexander.

Please see elog:280 . I will releae 2.3.6 with this bugfix somewhen during 
this week.

- Stefan
  293   Tue Apr 22 17:13:08 2003 Angy Alexander ZVYAGINAlexander.Zviagine@cern.chBug report  'Reply' removes attachments from the original message
It seems when I use "reply" with an attachments, the original attachments of
the message are removed.

I use elog-2.3.5

Alexander.
  292   Tue Apr 22 11:29:44 2003 Warning Thomas Saleinsalein@ckc.deBug report  Opera and IE behave different
I repeat ...
. Opera browser 7.03 simply crashes, when choosing the direct URL to our 
logbook, i.e. http://localhost:8080/logbook2. We have set a general 
password file and a different read password for each of our logbooks.
If we choose http://localhost:8080/logbook1 everything is fine. We get a 
window "Authentication required" and type in simply the read password, no 
user name.
If we choose http://localhost:8080/logbook2 the behaviour is different. We 
see the window "Authentication required" appear, then Opera crashes.
Change of the read passwords did not change this erroneous behaviour. This 
problem was not with version ELOG 2.3.4.

In Internet Explorer 6 all is okay.


 ... and add

The behaviour is different in those browsers even with the start page at 
http://localhost:8080/
Internet Explorer 6 demands a login. But as we have no password we cannot 
login.
Opera 7.03 demands no login and simply offers the list of logbooks to 
choose one.
ELOG V3.1.5-2eba886