| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
Text |
 |
|
68687
|
Fri Sep 15 15:16:42 2017 |
 | Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 3.1.2 | Re: Elog System Requirements | Hi Alan,
we run our ELOG server (38 GB
Logbook data in about 50 logbooks dating |
|
|
68695
|
Sat Oct 28 09:12:32 2017 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Linux | V3.1.1-0767eb0 | Re: Attribute option "+x" not searcheable | Hi Stefano,
you could try to html encode the "+" and
"-" sign in the option list
|
|
|
68697
|
Tue Oct 31 16:56:24 2017 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Linux | V3.1.1-0767eb0 | Re: Attribute option "+x" not searcheable | Hi Stefano,
I've tested it: it does not work.
Neither in edit nor in list view the HTML |
|
|
68700
|
Sat Nov 18 19:36:57 2017 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 3.1.2-bd7 | Re: hosts allow | Hi Susan,
according to the documentation
you need to add "Hosts deny = All" |
|
|
68707
|
Mon Nov 27 22:10:22 2017 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Windows | ELOG V3.1.3-fd7 | Re: Config: conditional coloring of items when 2 conditions are met (and|or) | I am not aware that it is forseen to define
logical operators in combination with the
Style command. How did you get the idea that |
|
|
68711
|
Fri Dec 8 19:47:04 2017 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 3.1.2-bd7 | Re: hosts allow | Hi Susan,
the documentation
states that you should start elogd with the
-v option from the command line and look |
|
|
68720
|
Tue Jan 16 10:13:00 2018 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 3.1.2 | Re: Is there a python3 api to generate logbook entries from python? | Have a look here: https://github.com/paulscherrerinstitute/py_elog
I haven't tried it myself,
but it should allow you to add, reply, edit, |
|
|
68730
|
Thu Feb 1 10:14:55 2018 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.9.2->3.1.3 | Re: v3.1.3 does not work with logbooks from v2.9.2? | Hi Yves,
just my two pence,
maybe they help you to figure out what's
going on:
versions 2.* had |
|