Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 773 of 807  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subjectdown
  976   Tue Mar 8 17:31:55 2005 Question Benjamin Brownbrownbr@hotmail.comQuestionLinux2.5.7Compilation flag/file question
If I want to go to the latest CVS release, what files do I have to compile
along with the elogd.c file?  Also, do I need to use any special gcc flags
for the compilation?  Thanks.
  67602   Tue Nov 5 23:21:52 2013 Question A.G. Schubertalexis4@stanford.eduBug reportMac OSX2.9.2-2494Compilation failure on Mac OSX 10.9

When compiling elog on OSX 10.9 (Mavericks), I get the error below.

Elog will compile without error if I add -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0 to CFLAGS in Makefile, but I'm not sure whether this is a good idea.

 

$ make

cc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall  -I../mxml  -DHAVE_SSL -w -c -o crypt.o src/crypt.c

cc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall  -I../mxml  -DHAVE_SSL -o elog src/elog.c crypt.o -lssl

src/elog.c:125:8: error: expected parameter declarator

size_t strlcpy(char *dst, const char *src, size_t size)

       ^

/usr/include/secure/_string.h:105:44: note: expanded from macro 'strlcpy'

  __builtin___strlcpy_chk (dest, src, len, __darwin_obsz (dest))

                                           ^

/usr/include/secure/_common.h:39:62: note: expanded from macro '__darwin_obsz'

#define __darwin_obsz(object) __builtin_object_size (object, _USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL > 1 ? 1 : 0)

                                                             ^

/usr/include/secure/_common.h:30:32: note: expanded from macro '_USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL'

#    define _USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL 2

                               ^

src/elog.c:125:8: error: expected ')'

/usr/include/secure/_string.h:105:44: note: expanded from macro 'strlcpy'

  __builtin___strlcpy_chk (dest, src, len, __darwin_obsz (dest))

                                           ^

/usr/include/secure/_common.h:39:62: note: expanded from macro '__darwin_obsz'

#define __darwin_obsz(object) __builtin_object_size (object, _USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL > 1 ? 1 : 0)

                                                             ^

/usr/include/secure/_common.h:30:32: note: expanded from macro '_USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL'

#    define _USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL 2

                               ^

src/elog.c:125:8: note: to match this '('

/usr/include/secure/_string.h:105:44: note: expanded from macro 'strlcpy'

  __builtin___strlcpy_chk (dest, src, len, __darwin_obsz (dest))

                                           ^

/usr/include/secure/_common.h:39:53: note: expanded from macro '__darwin_obsz'

#define __darwin_obsz(object) __builtin_object_size (object, _USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL > 1 ? 1 : 0)

 

                                                    ^

  1397   Wed Aug 10 18:32:14 2005 Warning Oleg SolovyanovOleg.Solovyanov@ihep.ruBug reportLinux2.6.0-b4Comment tooltip shows comment from other logbook
I have several logbooks with Comment lines,
but the tooltip shows sometimes the correct comment,
sometimes the comment from other logbook...

I see the same behaviour also on this very page...

I use Mozilla 1.7.10.
Tried with Konqueror -> same problem.
  66504   Mon Aug 10 21:07:15 2009 Idea David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukCommentLinux2.7.7-2251Comment on: Alphabetize Quick Option filter
(For some reason I could not add this in Dennis's thread.)

I like this new feature, BUT

I happen to have two Options:   Options System, and Options Status.

System are a very few items, whereas Status has a long list, which, like Dennis's example, can be added to. 
Keeping the latter in alpha order is great, but it's a shame that the cost is that Options System are also
sorted alphabetically, whereas it has a natural order which it would be preferable to keep - for example (and
this is made up)

Options System: 3.1, NT, 2000, XP, Vista

where the natural order here is chronological.

Perhaps the configuration file option could be more specific, for example

Sort attribute Options Status = 1

which would then NOT sort Options System.  If both are needed to be sorted, both should be specified, or back to
the original syntax which defaults to sort *all* Options.
  67359   Sat Oct 27 18:15:37 2012 Question Philippe Rousselotrousselot@rousselot.orgInfoLinux | WindowslatestComment avoir elog en français II

Bonjour,

tout est dans le titre.

Merci

 

For those who speak strange languages, I asked how to get a french version of elog.

 

By the way, this is my second mail because I forgot to give an icon to the first mail, and when I hit Back to do so, my text was erased. Bug or normal obnoxious attitude of my browser ?

Thanks in advance

 

Philippe

 

  67358   Sat Oct 27 18:10:14 2012 Entry Philippe Rousselotrousselot@rousselot.orgQuestionLinux | WindowslatestComment avoir elog en français
  1720   Thu Feb 23 12:06:44 2006 Question Holger Mundhahsholger.mundhahs@vtg-rail.comQuestionWindows2.6.1-1653Comment <attr>/Tooltip <attr> not shown in detail view
I've defined a comment or a tooltip for an attribute.
But the text is only shown in NEW/EDIT/REPLY mode, not in detail view.
Is this a bug or how can I enable the text (especially Comment) in
this view?
  68147   Fri Oct 23 03:36:18 2015 Question Dawangraymund.dawang@gmail.comRequestWindowsLatestColumns numeric input are added/computed

Hi Stefan,

Good day. I'm thinking if this wishlist is already available in elog. The values in columns we're added or computed according to formula set in a single separate column.

 

Thanks,

 

Raymund

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6