ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
283
|
Mon Apr 14 16:28:57 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Info | | | Re: Question | > Is there a way to hide logbooks from all views.
>
> Basically i want to use the move function to move old entries to another
> logbook but only want administrators to be able to see the logbooks in the
> view, everyone will just see the primary ones.
>
> At the min im having to put Archive logbook, everyone is complaining at me
> that there is too many to choose from :)
>
> Any suggestions ?
What about grouping the archive logbooks into a logbook group? Like:
Group Pubilc = Logook1, Logbook2, ...
Group Archive = Archive1, Archive2, ...
So if a "normal" user is in the public group, it only sees Logoook1, ... and
a single tab "archive", which is then (I hope) not too much to choose from. |
282
|
Mon Apr 14 15:07:02 2003 |
| nickc1 | nick@nick.com | Info | | | Question | Is there a way to hide logbooks from all views.
Basically i want to use the move function to move old entries to another
logbook but only want administrators to be able to see the logbooks in the
view, everyone will just see the primary ones.
At the min im having to put Archive logbook, everyone is complaining at me
that there is too many to choose from :)
Any suggestions ? |
281
|
Mon Apr 14 11:05:17 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | | | Re: Disappearing attachments | > > I am using 2.3.4 and I am still having this problem. If someone posts a
> > message with an attachment, and I then reply to that message, the
attachment
> > gets 'deattached' from that message. However, the file is still in the
> > logbook directory, so it is possible to recover it, but it did cause a
> slight
> > panic the first time it happened :)
>
> Uups, that is indeed a problem. I found that it was unrelated to the first
> one, so it was there since quite some time now. I fixed it. It will come
out
> in 2.3.6 or can be obtained already now from CVS. It is trongly recommended
> to upgrade all installations to avoid this problem.
Just as a test, I reply to my previous message... looks like it works. |
280
|
Mon Apr 14 11:04:52 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | | | Re: Disappearing attachments | > I am using 2.3.4 and I am still having this problem. If someone posts a
> message with an attachment, and I then reply to that message, the attachment
> gets 'deattached' from that message. However, the file is still in the
> logbook directory, so it is possible to recover it, but it did cause a
slight
> panic the first time it happened :)
Uups, that is indeed a problem. I found that it was unrelated to the first
one, so it was there since quite some time now. I fixed it. It will come out
in 2.3.6 or can be obtained already now from CVS. It is trongly recommended
to upgrade all installations to avoid this problem. |
Attachment 1: elogd.cfg
|
[global]
logbook tabs = 0
port = 8080
[demo]
Theme = default
Comment = General linux tips & tricks
Attributes = Author, Type, Category, Subject
Options Type = Routine, Software Installation, Problem Fixed, Configuration, Other
Options Category = General, Hardware, Software, Network, Other
Required Attributes = Author, Type
Page Title = ELOG - $subject
Reverse sort = 1
Quick filter = Date, Type
|
279
|
Sun Apr 13 14:32:52 2003 |
| Justin Dieters | enderak@yahoo.com | Bug report | | | Re: Disappearing attachments | I am using 2.3.4 and I am still having this problem. If someone posts a
message with an attachment, and I then reply to that message, the attachment
gets 'deattached' from that message. However, the file is still in the
logbook directory, so it is possible to recover it, but it did cause a slight
panic the first time it happened :)
I see there is a 2.3.5 version now, but the changelog doesn't say anything
about this problem, so I have not tried it yet.
Is there a 'trick' to fix this problem?
EDIT: I noticed when I replyed to your message, your elog.cfg attachment is
no longer there. So it appears it's not fixed in 2.3.5 either..
> This is a known problem and has been fixed in version 2.3.4, which has been
> released today. To prove that it's working, I attached the current
> elogd.cfg from this forum. |
278
|
Wed Apr 9 16:06:31 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Info | | | Re: Bugs with 2.3.5 | > Error sending Email
> Please use your browser's back button to go back
This error is caused if elogd cannot contact your SMTP server for sending
email. Can you please check the "SMTP host" entry in the configuration file?
> Is there a way to convert all the hashes from one system to another, the
> problem ive got is my password files are quiet large and want upgrades of
> this nature to go seemlessly without people complaining about it.
Unfortunately not. The old system had a bug which deleted the last one or two
characters, if the password length was dividable by three. Since the
characters were deleted, there is no way to reconstruct the full password. I
apoligize for the inconveniences, I know that this can cause lot of trouble,
but therefore I implemented the "Forgot password?" functionality, so that
users can log in again. Alternatively, one can edit the password file, delete
all passwords, and ask the users to log in without password and change it
afterwards immediately. |
277
|
Wed Apr 9 15:50:38 2003 |
| nickc1 | nick@nick.com | Info | | | Re: Bugs with 2.3.5 | > > Forgot password option generates an error message
>
> Which error? Can you be more specific. I tried it myself with this forum
and
> it worked for me.
Error sending Email
Please use your browser's back button to go back
HTTP/1.1 200 Document follows Server: ELOG HTTP 2.3.5 Content-Type:
text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 Connection: Keep-Alive Keep-Alive: timeout=60,
max=10
User name "nickc" not registered
Please use your browser's back button to go back
Yet nickc is in the password file, it generates the same message for any
other users in there too.
>
> > Password file hashes are different causing migrated password files to
fail
> > but only for certain users, try password 516135 hashed in 2.3.4 and
compare
> > to version 2.3.5 they are different.
>
> Yes indeed. Please see elog:273 for more details
Is there a way to convert all the hashes from one system to another, the
problem ive got is my password files are quiet large and want upgrades of
this nature to go seemlessly without people complaining about it.
>
> > Summary page title = string doesnt work also it results in the default
ELOG
> > DB Name
>
> Thanks, has just been fixed, new version under CVS.
>
> - Stefan
Ta |
276
|
Wed Apr 9 13:58:59 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Info | | | Re: Bugs with 2.3.5 | > Forgot password option generates an error message
Which error? Can you be more specific. I tried it myself with this forum and
it worked for me.
> Password file hashes are different causing migrated password files to fail
> but only for certain users, try password 516135 hashed in 2.3.4 and compare
> to version 2.3.5 they are different.
Yes indeed. Please see elog:273 for more details
> Summary page title = string doesnt work also it results in the default ELOG
> DB Name
Thanks, has just been fixed, new version under CVS.
- Stefan |
|