ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
66519
|
Mon Aug 24 21:47:14 2009 |
| Allen | bastss@rit.edu | Bug report | Linux | 2.7.7-2246 | Fix text prevents user from editing text during creation, instead of just edit | When we set Fix text = 1, according to the syntax, this should prevent users from modifying the text field during an edit, but it looks like it is blocking access at both time of edit and creation, meaning you can never add anything to it. Is that the intended functionality? |
66638
|
Thu Dec 3 20:25:50 2009 |
| Allen | bastss@rit.edu | Bug fix | Linux | 2.7.7 | elogd keeps crashing, any thoughts? | We are trying to track down an issue where elogd just stops, and I cannot seem to find a cause.
In the logs, I see:
Dec 3 14:01:23 nissrv18a kernel: [419738.139675] elogd[32003]: segfault at 4 ip 00007f183b19b560 sp 00007fff79f5e278 error 4
in libc-2.10.1.so[7f183b119000+166000]
Any thoughts? |
66831
|
Fri May 21 14:37:26 2010 |
| Allen | bastss@rit.edu | Question | Linux | 2.7.8 | Restricting logbook view | Is there anyway to restrict access so that a user can only see the log entries they post or only replies to their log entry? I know it is possible to restrict editing to only posts they submitted, but I have a need to not even allow them to see other posts except for what they submitted and I am wondering if this is possible currently, or if this is planned, or could be planned for a future version?
Thanks,
Allen |
67160
|
Wed Jan 11 22:19:49 2012 |
| Allen | bastss@rit.edu | Bug report | Windows | 2.9.0-2396 | Elog does not work after installing MS12-006/MS12-012 on Win 7 | After patching a windows 7 computer with MS12-006, can no longer connect to elog, get page cannot be displayed
See
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2643584 |
67161
|
Thu Jan 12 19:34:28 2012 |
| Allen | bastss@rit.edu | Bug report | Windows | 2.9.0-2396 | Re: Elog does not work after installing MS12-006/MS12-012 on Win 7 |
A little more information here
We are running elog on an Ubuntu server
Elog was working fine, then, on a windows 7 machine, MS12-006 was installed, rebooted, and could no longer connect to the elog web page.
Discovered that in Internet Explorer 8, by unchecking the use TLS 1.0 in options advanced tab, and making sure that SSL 3.0, TLS 1.1, TLS 1.2 were checked, that the page once again worked. I'm guessing the elog does not support SSL 3.0, otherwise, I assume I would have to uncheck that as well. Things do appear to still work on XP, thus far, only Windows 7 appears to break. While we have a work around, ideally we would like to see a bug fix so that (for legacy reasons), elog will still work with TLS 1.0 on Windows 7.
|
67162
|
Thu Jan 12 19:37:52 2012 |
| Allen | bastss@rit.edu | Bug report | Windows | 2.9.0-2396 | Re: Elog does not work after installing MS12-006/MS12-012 on Win 7 |
Allen wrote: |
A little more information here
We are running elog on an Ubuntu server
Elog was working fine, then, on a windows 7 machine, MS12-006 was installed, rebooted, and could no longer connect to the elog web page.
Discovered that in Internet Explorer 8, by unchecking the use TLS 1.0 in options advanced tab, and making sure that SSL 3.0, TLS 1.1, TLS 1.2 were checked, that the page once again worked. I'm guessing the elog does not support SSL 3.0, otherwise, I assume I would have to uncheck that as well. Things do appear to still work on XP, thus far, only Windows 7 appears to break. While we have a work around, ideally we would like to see a bug fix so that (for legacy reasons), elog will still work with TLS 1.0 on Windows 7.
|
Also, strangely, I am able to use the elog forum page https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum while TLS 1.0 is checked. I notice the version number is 2.9.0-2425, while we are using 2.9.0-2396, so wondering if this is fixed in this newer version. |
69726
|
Tue Jan 30 13:10:38 2024 |
| Alexey Khudyakov | khudyakov@sepulcarium.org | Bug report | Linux | ELOG V3.1.5 | Re: http status 200 returned for "file not found" | > "file not found" should return http code 404. elogd returns code 200 together
> with a page containing text "404 not found". This pollutes the browser cache
> with wrong content (in this case, we are trying to load a css file, and the browser
> is trying to use text "404 not found" as if it were a css. bad. file not found
> should return http code 404. K.O.
Yes. That's quite a problem when interacting with ELOG programmatically. Only way to
find whether response succeeded or failed with 404 is to parse response body
When file is not found send_file_direct calls show_html_header which in turn calls
show_http_header which sets HTTP code 200 unconditionally. It's reasonably easy to
patch around. |
2007
|
Thu Oct 19 11:45:18 2006 |
| Alexandre Lindote | alex@lipc.fis.uc.pt | Question | Linux | 2.6.2-1699 | How to pass attachment names to an Execute line? | Hi,
I'm trying to pass the name of an attachment in a "Execute new " line, but I can't seem to get the correct syntax...
I've tried:
Execute new = echo "New document with reference $Internal Ref with the name $attachements " >> /home/zeplin3/lixo.log
Execute new = echo "New document with reference $Internal Ref with the name $attachements1 " >> /home/zeplin3/lixo.log
Execute new = echo "New document with reference $Internal Ref with the name $1 " >> /home/zeplin3/lixo.log
but nothing seem to work. If I remove the $attachments bit the output is correct...
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Alex |
|