Re: Preset text Dont work more!, posted by Alex H on Thu Mar 31 10:33:10 2005
|
> > Yes I have upgraded Elog to 2.5.8-2.
> > I submit my new elogd.cfg file maybe it will help you.
> > I have try the preset text under Firefox (the last), avant browser 10.0
|
|
Re: HTML-File as attachement, posted by Becher on Wed Apr 6 23:02:47 2005
|
I think this is reasonable. All the HTML-files which I want insert (created with the software
INCA) are not shown correctly. My testfiles made with OpenOffice are shown correctly. Maybe
you have the time to program an option for the attachement "Show inside/Show in new window or
|
|
Re: Conditional Attributes/Preset Text, posted by David Brody on Thu Apr 7 00:51:05 2005
|
> > I upgraded from ver 2.5.5-2 to 2.5.8-2 and found that none of my preset text
> > worked any longer. I struggled with it for several hours and then reverted
> > back to 2.5.5-2 and the preset text worked again. I have attached my
|
|
Re: rss feed title & conditional attributes, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Mon May 2 15:40:02 2005
|
> Ok, fixed. I do however not evaluate the conditional attribute, but just remove any
> empty attribute, I guess that makes more sense.
|
|
Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Steve Jones on Mon May 9 20:58:11 2005
|
> > I ask because I get a dependency that I did not have before with 2.5.3.
> > Compiling with my same 'ole gcc 2.95.2 I see that I now need mxml.h and
> > strlcpy.h. Trying to compile under gcc 3.4 results in all kinds of errors.
|
|
Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Steve Jones on Mon May 9 21:08:56 2005
|
> > > I ask because I get a dependency that I did not have before with 2.5.3.
> > > Compiling with my same 'ole gcc 2.95.2 I see that I now need mxml.h and
> > > strlcpy.h. Trying to compile under gcc 3.4 results in all kinds of errors.
|
|
Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon May 9 21:17:29 2005
|
> Ok, now I see the issue - the tar extract created the mxml directory in the root (not
> under the created directory elog-2.5.9). Is there a reason why these includes are not
> placed in the src dir like the regex.h/.c include?
|
|
Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Steve Jones on Mon May 9 23:30:11 2005
|
> [ritt@pc5082 /tmp]$ tar -xzvf elog-2.5.9-2.tar.gz
> elog-2.5.9/
> elog-2.5.9/doc/
|