Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 785 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
ID Date Icondown Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  583   Mon Jul 12 11:03:10 2004 Agree Ulrich Trüsselulrich.truessel@familienhund.chRequestAll2.5.3Re: Formatting parameters for attributes
Thank you Stefan!

1. Will help in the real hard cases!

2. Great! Specially editing adresses or some stutus overviews will be easier with a compleate
overview!

> > 1. Is there a possiblity to fix the position of the attribut fields if they are in
> > the same line? As. ex. if one attribute is empty or contain a very short value it may
> > be possible that the position of the following atrributes in the line are moving to
> > the left, if the value is very long, they move to the right side. This make it
> > sometime not easy to read the informations, specially if the user browses trough some
> > entries, the picture the eyes are scanning is changing.
> 
> Yes there is a possibility. In the format option, you can specify two CSS names, one for the
> attribute and one for it's value. The default ones are "attribname" and "attribvalue". Just
> make new ones by copying these two, renaming it to something like xxxname and xxxvalue where
> "xxxx" is the name of the attribute. You find that in the file themes/default/default.css.
> They contain a field called "width:" which can be changed:
> 
> .typename {
>   width:150px;             <-- must be changed
>   background-color:#CCCCFF;
>   border:1px solid #0000FF;
>   border-top:1px solid white;
>   border-left:1px solid white;
>   padding:3px;
> }
> 
> By having separate classes for all attributed, you can change their width separately,
> accomplishing hopefully what you need.
> 
> > 2. Did I understand you right, that tis will not work while editing? I would like to
> > put this to the wish list for a uppcoming version (not very importand, but VERY nice
> > to have), that it may be possible to use Format in the new and edit mode too, because
> > it is somtimes more comfortable to have some attributes grouped locically in one line
> > or to have a overview over all attributes on one screen without scrolling while editing.
> 
> I will put this on the wishlist.
> 
> Stefan
  610   Fri Jul 16 04:36:51 2004 Agree Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comQuestionAll2.5.3Re: Question on how "Format <attribute> = " works
> > Ok, I think I see now.  I was assuming it applied to the entry form as well.
> 
> Well, good idea. I implemented that. Have a look at this forum (just hit reply to this
> entry) and you'll see it. I'm not completely happy with it (at least on small 1024x768
> screens), but it's configurable anyhow. New version under CVS.

Now that creates an interesting display - especially with the icons and radio buttons. 
But it works!

Thanks.
  611   Fri Jul 16 04:37:47 2004 Agree Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comBug reportAll2.5.3Re: Possible Formatting bug: Summary view
> > A temporary fix for this is to set summary lines = 0
> 
> Right, that's the only way. I would call this "permanent fix" (;-)

I would too - and it actually produces the output that I wanted to see anyway.

Thanks!
  612   Fri Jul 16 06:20:40 2004 Agree Geo Geogorilla_geo@yahoo.com Windows2.53.Fixed Attribute Reply
Hi Stefan 
YOu have been a great help on the Elog problem solving .
I have another sort of bug , when i have a attribute type as date.
And i have fixed the attribute on reply , i actually get a string of 
number when i reply , and the date becomes not the orginal date in the 
first message.

So the way i work ard is that i did not place the date field in the fixed  
attribute reply which i will run the risk of pple modifying that entry .
Can this be fix?

Thanks 
  623   Wed Jul 28 16:13:04 2004 Agree Ulrich Trüsselulrich.truessel@familienhund.chBug reportWindows2.5.3 snapRe: List Dispaly produces wrong output in 2.5.3 built 23.7.04 (snapshot)
Thank you very much Stefan!!!

Also the horizontal alignement with "Format = 1" looks much better   as before
with standard css files! Really great work!

> > Using "List Display = <attributes>" produces an ususal output with the text
> > field content in the first row and a row title of the first 3 letters.
> 
> I fixed that problem. Please get the snapshot from July 28th 14:16.
  631   Wed Jul 28 22:07:31 2004 Agree Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comBug reportAll2.5.4?Re: getcfg problem in v1.410: Truncation of long config strings
> > Just compiled 1.410 and have run into an issue that *may* have been
> > introduced in 1.393.
> > 
> > Config file directives such as "Welcome title" could be very long strings. 
> > After compiling 1.410, our "Welcome title" is truncated and, while I haven't
> > counted the actual chars, I suspect that the truncation happens at 1024
> > characters.  The procedure 'getcfg' has a declared passed paramater "int
> > vsize". 
> 
> Actually before 1.393 you got a buffer overflow if any string in the
> configuration file was longer than 500 chars, so it's a miracle that your elogd
> did not crash on the long Welcome Title. I added the "vsize" parameter to avoid
> such crashes. To satisfy your need for a long Welcome title, I increased the
> string size for that particular case to 10000 chars. Hope this is enough.

Hmmm, it is a wonder.  Our welcome text was not significantly longer (about 20
chars longer) so perhaps . . . ?

Thanks, will recompile and report back.
  632   Wed Jul 28 22:08:16 2004 Agree Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comRequestAll2.5.3Re: WISHLIST: Type <attribute> = user
> Acknowledged. Added your vote to the wishlist.

Thanks!
  634   Wed Jul 28 22:32:39 2004 Agree Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comBug reportAll2.5.3Re: Date format problem in "Thread display = "
> > I get the following in my THREADED logbook view:
> > 
> > "Adding new services, planned for 1090519200. Last revised: Thu Jul 15
> > 18:03:52 2004"
> 
> That should be fixed by the current version. Please update.

Thanks!
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6