Defunct daemons, posted by David Pilgram on Sat Mar 29 12:14:11 2014
|
Hi Stefan and Andreas
Yesterday I reported I had some issues with the latest elog: but now I can reproduce one.
|
Re: Defunct daemons, posted by David Pilgram on Sat Mar 29 13:14:44 2014
|
Further work suggests that the type of pdf file might matter, as I have now seen the defunct daemon after
adding the first pdf file in an entry.
|
|
Re: Defunct daemons, posted by Konstantin Olchanski on Wed Nov 12 03:19:17 2014
|
Also see this in ALPHA at CERN. Eventually there are so many defunct elogd processes that the user runs out of "maxproc" quota and automatic submission
of elog messages starts to fail. (and the users complain, reboot all computers, etc).
|
|
Re: Defunct daemons, posted by Konstantin Olchanski on Wed Nov 12 03:48:29 2014
|
> Also see this in ALPHA at CERN.
> The elogd we use is this: https://bitbucket.org/ritt/elog/commits/44800a769b99599db7620779e2142b1161c694fc?at=master
|
|
Re: Defunct daemons, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Nov 24 13:24:27 2014
|
> Okey, found it. waitpid() in my_shell() is not protected against the periodic alarm signal. (UNIX signals are evil).
Acknowledged. Thanks for the fix. I added it to the development branch.
|
|
Elogbook on windows 8, posted by Ciaran White on Wed Nov 12 11:03:37 2014
|
i have been using elogbook V2.7.6 on my XP machine for a number of years. I ahve recently upgraded to windows 8 and the reply function on my entries
has changed. I can now see the previous entrys in HTML format rather than the reply box which used to appear and also my ability to upload attachments
and paste working linls is removed. Do i need to upgrade to the latest version and do i ned to back up my previous entries and how do i do this? |
|
Re: Elogbook on windows 8, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Nov 24 13:10:13 2014
|
Ciaran White wrote:
i have been using elogbook V2.7.6 on my XP machine for a number of years. I ahve recently upgraded to |
5.5.4 cannot decode AUTH parameter, posted by harish amin on Fri Nov 21 12:38:07 2014
|
Dear Team,
I am having a log book and would like to activate the email notification. I have made the changes as per the guidelines but I am getting the error
message while submitting the entry - Error |
|
Re: 5.5.4 cannot decode AUTH parameter, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Nov 21 16:09:37 2014
|
harish amin wrote:
Dear Team, |
|
Re: 5.5.4 cannot decode AUTH parameter, posted by harish amin on Fri Nov 21 17:00:09 2014
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
|
Re: 5.5.4 cannot decode AUTH parameter, posted by harish amin on Sat Nov 22 14:50:35 2014
|
harish amin wrote:
|
|
Re: 5.5.4 cannot decode AUTH parameter, posted by Yoshio Imai on Sat Nov 22 16:05:34 2014
|
[quote=harish amin]Dear Stefen,
Please help me & reply on my request. Is my global config correct?[/quote]
|
How to insert new entry between two entries., posted by Daniel Roldan on Mon Nov 3 15:28:41 2014
|
I would like to put between two entries a new entry.
My Users forgot to put a entry, and now they would like to put a new entry between olders entries.
For Example: |
|
Re: How to insert new entry between two entries., posted by David Pilgram on Mon Nov 3 17:14:44 2014
|
Daniel Roldan wrote:
I would like to put between two entries a new entry. |
|
Re: How to insert new entry between two entries., posted by Andreas Luedeke on Tue Nov 4 14:51:20 2014
|
Daniel Roldan wrote:
I would like to put between two entries a new entry. |
POODLE vulnerability, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Oct 24 12:51:00 2014 
|
IMPORTANT SECURITY ANNOUNCEMENT
Recently the POODLE vulnerability has been announced: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POODLE
ELOG is prone to this vulnerability if it runs directly the SSL protocol and can be accessed from the internet. If ELOG runs behind an Apache proxy,
and the Apache server has been correctly configured (disabled the SSLv23 protocols), ELOG is safe as well. |
|
Network Questions, posted by Hal Proctor on Wed Oct 22 19:52:58 2014
|
Our network team is doing some upgrades and would like the following questions answered if possible.
1: Is the application able to communicate with
a Domain controller running Windows Server 2012 R2?
And....
2: Is the application able to function in a Windows 2008 R2 domain and forest functional
level?
Thanks for your help,
Hal |
|
Re: Network Questions, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Oct 22 19:55:53 2014
|
Hal Proctor wrote:
Our network team is doing some upgrades and would like the following questions answered if possible. 1: Is the application |
|
Sort by date prior to 2002, posted by Chris Jennings on Tue Sep 16 17:59:27 2014
|
I have an attribute formatted as a date (but not labeled as date) and is sorted as second priority. The sort works fine until I enter a date older than
Jan 1st 2002. When I do this it is sorted as the latest. Is this a bug or simply not designed to use dates this old?
Thanks in advance, |
|
Re: Sort by date prior to 2002, posted by Chris Jennings on Tue Sep 16 18:05:41 2014
|
Chris Jennings wrote:
I have an attribute formatted as a date (but not labeled as date) and is sorted as second priority. The sort works |
Re: Sort by date prior to 2002, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Wed Sep 17 17:45:18 2014
|
Chris Jennings wrote:
|
|
Re: Sort by date prior to 2002, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Sep 22 14:39:10 2014
|
Andreas Luedeke wrote:
|
|
default font style, posted by Sara Vanini on Mon Sep 8 14:51:35 2014
|
Hi,
is it possibile to set a default font style: format, font, size, color, etc? how?
Thanks a lot |
|
Re: default font style, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Sep 9 10:12:37 2014
|
Sara Vanini wrote:
Hi, |
|
Re: default font style, posted by Sara Vanini on Tue Sep 9 15:42:53 2014
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
|
Re: default font style, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Sep 9 15:50:25 2014
|
Sara Vanini wrote:
|