Enforce new thumbnails, posted by Martin Rongen on Mon Jun 24 15:46:43 2013
|
Hi everyone
The past few days I have been editing elogd.c to link all image files to the PIXLR-API (http://pixlr.com/). I am now at a point where the edited
images are uploaded fine to the elog server, but in order for the thumbnails to refresh one needs to click edit and thus load the FCKeditor for the |
Filter and sorting, posted by UlfO on Wed May 29 08:38:04 2013
|
Hi,
We have a fire preventive team at our company doing periodic inspections of our |
Re: Filter and sorting, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jun 4 16:52:18 2013
|
UlfO wrote:
Hi, |
|
Re: Filter and sorting, posted by UlfO on Tue Jun 4 17:02:32 2013
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
|
Re: Filter and sorting, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jun 4 17:07:13 2013
|
UlfO wrote:
|
|
Re: Filter and sorting, posted by UlfO on Tue Jun 4 17:16:32 2013
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
|
Latest windows version vs 2.9.2.2455, posted by UlfO on Tue Jun 4 17:07:04 2013
|
What is the differences between E-log windows version 2.9.2-2455 like we run and E-log windows version 2.9.2.-2475 ?
I cant find a changelog for this. |
|
Re: Latest windows version vs 2.9.2.2455, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jun 4 17:09:44 2013
|
UlfO wrote:
|
|
Re: Latest windows version vs 2.9.2.2455, posted by UlfO on Tue Jun 4 17:14:25 2013
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
|
Sorting by numeric attribute (not entry ID)., posted by David Pilgram on Mon Jun 3 20:02:38 2013
|
By default, elog enties are sorted by their ID number. When viewing a logbook in Full or Summary, they are
shown in strict order of ID. In Threaded, entries are shown in strict order of ID for the latest entry of each
thread, and then previous entries (in reply to) back from the latest one.
|
|
Re: Sorting by numeric attribute (not entry ID)., posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jun 4 12:03:18 2013
|
> By default, elog enties are sorted by their ID number. When viewing a logbook in Full or Summary, they are
> shown in strict order of ID. In Threaded, entries are shown in strict order of ID for the latest entry of each
> thread, and then previous entries (in reply to) back from the latest one.
|
|
Re: Sorting by numeric attribute (not entry ID)., posted by David Pilgram on Tue Jun 4 15:00:23 2013
|
> > By default, elog enties are sorted by their ID number. When viewing a logbook in Full or Summary, they are
> > shown in strict order of ID. In Threaded, entries are shown in strict order of ID for the latest entry of each
> > thread, and then previous entries (in reply to) back from the latest one.
|
|
Daemonizing vs. shell execution, posted by Martin Rongen on Mon Jun 3 15:44:46 2013
|
Hi all
I have setup an logbook that executes a number of shell scripts to preset attributes and append standart information, which works great. Now I
am trying to daemonise the whole thing. I have tried the -D option as well as daemontools. In both cases the logbook itself is functional but the bash |
|
Re: Daemonizing vs. shell execution, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Jun 3 15:53:22 2013
|
Martin Rongen wrote:
Hi all |
|
Re: Daemonizing vs. shell execution, posted by Martin Rongen on Tue Jun 4 13:26:02 2013
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
|
"full" only changes color, posted by Kees Bol on Mon Aug 1 11:58:43 2005
|
Hi,
I have the strange problem that when changing to "full"-diplaymode the output looks the same as with "summary", only the color is different. The texts
don't appear.
|
|
Re: "full" only changes color, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Aug 2 08:56:21 2005
|
[quote="Kees Bol"]I have the strange problem that when changing to "full"-diplaymode the output looks the same as with "summary", only the color is different.
The texts don't appear.
Any idea what can cause this behaviour?[/quote]
|
|
Re: "full" only changes color, posted by Kees Bol on Tue Aug 2 10:25:32 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Kees Bol"]I have the strange problem that when changing to "full"-diplaymode the output looks the same as with "summary", only
the color is different. The texts don't appear.
Any idea what can cause this behaviour?[/quote]
|
Re: "full" only changes color, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Aug 4 22:35:57 2005 
|
[quote="Kees Bol"]I thougt when choosing the full-view the text would appear along with the other attributes.[/quote]
That's how it is supposed to be. I tried your config file, added three entries, and got the behaviour documented in the attached images. To me everything |
|
Re: "full" only changes color, posted by Kees Bol on Fri Aug 5 10:00:00 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Kees Bol"]I thougt when choosing the full-view the text would appear along with the other attributes.[/quote]
That's how it is supposed to be. I tried your config file, added three entries, and got the behaviour documented in the attached images. To me everything |
|
Re: "full" only changes color, posted by Kees Bol on Fri Aug 5 10:51:27 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Kees Bol"]I thougt when choosing the full-view the text would appear along with the other attributes.[/quote]
That's how it is supposed to be. I tried your config file, added three entries, and got the behaviour documented in the attached images. To me everything |
|
Re: "full" only changes color, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Aug 5 10:54:49 2005
|
[quote="Kees Bol"]Stefan, I installed V2.6.0-beta3 and there is a (unwanted) difference. The Text field now appears in the summary-view despite the config
specifies:
|
Re: "full" only changes color, posted by Kees Bol on Fri Aug 5 14:30:52 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Kees Bol"]Stefan, I installed V2.6.0-beta3 and there is a (unwanted) difference. The Text field now appears in the summary-view
despite the config specifies:
|
|
Re: "full" only changes color, posted by Martin Rongen on Mon Jun 3 15:49:33 2013
|
[quote="Kees Bol"]Hi,
I have the strange problem that when changing to "full"-diplaymode the output looks the same as with "summary", only the color is different. The texts
don't appear.
|
|
Application failed to initialize properly, posted by Norm on Sat May 18 17:41:51 2013
|
I attempted to install the newest version of elog on our site elog server from an old old version. Around 2008 I believe. I then received
an application failed to initialize properly 0xc0150002 after installing the newest version. I then tried installing the Feb 2013 version and received
the same message. Panicked, I rolled back our server to its state yesterday. I would like to update our elog software, anyone know why I am |
|
Re: Application failed to initialize properly, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Tue May 21 14:33:09 2013
|
Norm wrote:
I attempted to install the newest version of elog on our site elog server from an old old version. Around 2008 I believe. I then |
|
Re: Application failed to initialize properly, posted by Norm on Sat May 25 16:09:58 2013
|
Andreas Luedeke wrote:
|
|
Re: Application failed to initialize properly, posted by Norm on Sat Jun 1 20:20:03 2013
|
Andreas Luedeke wrote:
|
|
Re: Application failed to initialize properly, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Mon Jun 3 13:56:35 2013
|
Norm wrote:
|
|
hyperlink other elog posts, posted by Remington Tyler Thornton on Tue May 28 19:01:42 2013
|
I am on an experiment that used ELOG for all documentation and meeting notes. In our meeting notes we link to elog posts that had been discussed during
the meeting. We had done this by hyperlinking the URL to the entry. Recently we had to move our logbook to another machine and so none of our hyperlinks
work since the URLs have changed. I noticed that when one creates a new entry in the subject they can reference another post. Is there a way to link another |
|
Re: hyperlink other elog posts, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Wed May 29 14:57:23 2013
|
Remington Tyler Thornton wrote:
I am on an experiment that used ELOG for all documentation and meeting notes. In our meeting notes we |