Query

(FYI, OS = FreeBSD, Elog Version as showing on logon box = V3.1.4-)

Is it possible to use both Style <attribute> and Cell Style <attribute> on the same row?
For example, have a Logbook containing several Attributes and display a subset of those attributes in Summary Mode. Two attributes are of interest for this query which are part of the attributes displayed in Summary Mode, attributes ‘Assign Line’ and ‘Service’ 

If the ‘Attribute Assign Line = Assign 1’ then shade all cells in that row #808080
but if the ‘Attribute Service = 1600’ always shade that cell #7A5776 

Config file includes
Style Assign Line Assign 1 = background-color:#808080
Cell Style Service 1600 = background-color:#7A5776

The result is the row gets shaded #808080 if ‘Assign Line = Assign Line 1’ but fails to shade the Service cell colour #7A5776 if it equals 1600 

Extract from HTML source for the ‘1600’ cell when both conditions are correct shows both background-color values are present and the cell is styled the first value listed (which is Style Assign Line Assign 1 = background-color:#808080 but I always want #7A5776 for cell Service when it is of value 1600)
.
<td class="list2" style="background-color:#808080" style="background-color:#7A5776"><a href="../Daily/1">1600</a></td>  

Thank you,

David

Return-Path: 
Received: from ligo.phys.lsu.edu ([unix socket])
	by ligo.phys.lsu.edu (Cyrus v2.1.13) with LMTP; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:27:03 -0600
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
Received: from ligo.phys.lsu.edu (ligo.phys.lsu.edu [130.39.181.231])
	by ligo.phys.lsu.edu (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 5E12A788D1; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:27:03 -0600 (CST)
To: ELOG@ligo.phys.lsu.edu, user@ligo.phys.lsu.edu
From: elog@ligo.phys.lsu.edu
Subject: New playground elog entry
X-Mailer: Elog, Version 2.3.9
X-Elog-URL: http://ligo.phys.lsu.edu:8080/playground/13
X-Elog-submit-type: web|elog
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 22:27:03 +52182819
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Message-Id: <20040128222703.5E12A788D1@ligo.phys.lsu.edu>

A new entry has been submitted on ligo.phys.lsu.edu

Logbook             : playground
Author              : Joseph Giaime
Type                : Other
Category            : Other
Subject             : yet another test

Logbook URL         : http://ligo.phys.lsu.edu:8080/playground/13

I have just installed elog 2.8.1 on my OpenBSD 4.8 server (I've added the necessary Makefile patch to "Contributions"). Everything seems to work fine, however, I ran into a very odd problems with the dates of the logbook entries: When I start a new entry, the current date/time is displayed correctly. When I submit the entry and look at it again, the date has changed to some value in 1996 . I've checked the actual logbook file and there, the entry has a Date line like this:

Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 23:53:28 -13049141
 

The "-13049141" looks very suspicious to me - but I have no idea whatsoever why this happens. I had elogd running with -v, but that did not give me any hints. Any ideas how to debug/resolve this would be much appreciated...

I have 4 services running on a Windows Server 2008 R2 machines, 4 separate logs, only one of them is doing this, but that could be because only one of them is trying to delete records once they are posted, I cannot say.

On that one log, everything runs fine until they try to delete a record, and they are doing it under the admin login, but the service hangs.  anyone trying to log in get the 404 error that the page is not available.  to clear it I have to open Manage/Services and then Task Manager.  First I kill the process for that log book, then I can restart the service and everything is back.. trying to stop the service and then start it, or just restart the service, this does no good, in fact, it will hang at stopping the service.. it is not responding at all.  this happened to the same log when I had this on the original Windows Server 2003, so it is not new.. they just don't delete things for a long time, then they seem to do it every week, more than once.. and usually at night or on the weekend. (are they just doing it to mess with me?  Maybe, but I do not think so since it would not get me in trouble if I were busy, out of town or just not home and could not get to it until the next business day and they know this..

Any ideas what could cause this?

My Configuration is as follows, with only the names changed to protect the guilty:

[global]
port = 8081
SSL = 1

css = solar.css
password file = PWFILE
self register = 0
login expiration = 0
restrict edit = 1

Allow Password change = 0
List Menu Commands = New, Find, Select, Config, Help
Menu Commands = List, New, Edit, Delete, Reply, Help
Enable Attachments = 0
show attachments = 0
display mode = summary

admin users = admin,ME
login users = user,ME,user2,user3
deny config = user,ME,user2,user3
deny delete = user,ME,user2,user3
deny edit = user,ME,user2,user3

Welcome Title = <p><font size=6 color=white> S---- T------ Furnace Logs</font><br><font size=3 color=white> These logs are C---------- Confidential: </font> <font size=3 color=55ff55> Green </font>
Attributes = Badge, Run, Recipe, Mod, Rebraze, W.O., Operation, Item, Qty
Options Mod = Boolean
Options Rebraze = Boolean

list display = date, Badge, Run, Recipe, Mod, Rebraze, W.O., Operation, Item, Qty

Options Recipe = AN001, AN002, AN003, AN004
Extendable Options = Recipe
Required Attributes = Badge, Recipe, W.O., Operation, Item, Qty
default encoding = 1
allowed encoding = 1
allow HTML = 0
suppress default = 3
suppress email on edit = 3
display email recipients = 0

[V8]
Theme = default
Comment = V8 Furnace Log Data Owner: B. Sands
Preset Run = V8-%Y-####
Locked Attributes = Run
Page Title = ELOG - $subject
Reverse sort = 1
Quick filter = Date

[V9]
Theme = default
Comment = V9 Furnace Log Data Owner: B. Sands
Preset Run = V9-%Y-####
Locked Attributes = Run
Page Title = ELOG - $subject
Reverse sort = 1
Quick filter = Date

[V10]
Theme = default
Comment = V10 Furnace Log Data Owner: B. Sands
Preset Run = V10-%Y-####
Locked Attributes = Run
Page Title = ELOG - $subject
Reverse sort = 1
Quick filter = Date

[V11]
Theme = default
Comment = V11 Furnace Log Data Owner: B. Sands
Preset Run = V11-%Y-####
Locked Attributes = Run
Page Title = ELOG - $subject
Reverse sort = 1
Quick filter = Date

[V12]
Theme = default
Comment = V12 Furnace Log Data Owner: B. Sands
Preset Run = V12-%Y-####
Locked Attributes = Run
Page Title = ELOG - $subject
Reverse sort = 1
Quick filter = Date

[V13]
Theme = default
Comment = V13 Furnace Log Data Owner: B. Sands
Preset Run = V13-%Y-####
Locked Attributes = Run
Page Title = ELOG - $subject
Reverse sort = 1
Quick filter = Date

[Freezer]
Theme = default
Comment = Freezer Furnace Log Data Owner: B. Sands
Preset Run = Fre-%Y-####
Preset recipe = None
Locked Attributes = Run
Page Title = ELOG - $subject
Reverse sort = 1
Quick filter = Date

[MyTest]
Theme = default
List Menu Commands = New, Find, Select, Config, CSV Import, Help

Comment = MyTest Log
Preset Run = MT-%Y-####
Locked Attributes = Run
Page Title = ELOG - $subject
Reverse sort = 1
Quick filter = Date

Hi all,

We've been happily using ELOG for years, but ran into an odd problem when replacing the old Solaris server that ran the ELOG with a newer box running Ubuntu. 

Basically, when I try to search the log, the URL seems to be malformed. I.e. the form produces the query string:

?mode=summvry&reverse=0&reverse=1&npp=35&m&y&Authorthor=ericq

Instead of a functional one like:

?mode=summary&reverse=1&npp=35&Author=ericq

We're running v2.8.1, since we like using the global write password mode; our log is viewable here: http://nodus.ligo.caltech.edu:8080 Any ideas what could've gone wrong? Installation was pretty straightforward, the code compiled happily on the ubuntu machine. 

Incidentally, I notice this logbook is running V3, using CKeditor. Any hints when these might be available for public use?

Thanks!